Originally posted by: lobbyone
I'm confused now, but I believe you should be getting back your $400 not $300 when and if you return the guitar. Seller sounds like a 14 year old.
His voice sounded more like someone in his 20's
Originally posted by: lobbyone
I'm confused now, but I believe you should be getting back your $400 not $300 when and if you return the guitar. Seller sounds like a 14 year old.
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
meh, tell him the intial agreement was that he woudl send you the insurance check for the repairs. You have the mesasages saved. Otherwise, just file a chargeback and keep the guitar
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: TuxDave
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Basically, my question is this: (Read the quoted message first)
Isnt it only fair that I get to keep the guitar + get $300.00 in cash (to either pocket or to use for repairs) than for the seller to get my $400.00 (that I sent) and the $300.00 (that UPS sent?)
So...
1) You keep the broken guitar + $300 for repairs and he keeps the $400 from you
2) You get nothing and lose nothing. He gets back a broken guitar and $300 for repairs.
Either or the two options above are fine and "fair".
3) You get the broken guitar + $100 for repairs and he keeps $400 from you and $200 for repairs.
The last option doesn't make sense.
You read it wrong
1) I keep the broken guitar + $100.00 and he keeps $400.00 (from me) and $200.00 (from UPS)
The REPAIR COST = >>$350.00<< (Although I may be able to get it down a little and pocket it)
Originally posted by: TravisT
Maybe I am reading it wrong...
He is saying by the looks of it to me, "Look, give me the guitar back, you get your money back, no harm done."
If you want to keep the guitar, you could say... "No, i want to keep the guitar but have it repaired here. Could you please mail me the $300 in insurance to get the guitar fixed?"
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: TuxDave
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Basically, my question is this: (Read the quoted message first)
Isnt it only fair that I get to keep the guitar + get $300.00 in cash (to either pocket or to use for repairs) than for the seller to get my $400.00 (that I sent) and the $300.00 (that UPS sent?)
So...
1) You keep the broken guitar + $300 for repairs and he keeps the $400 from you
2) You get nothing and lose nothing. He gets back a broken guitar and $300 for repairs.
Either or the two options above are fine and "fair".
3) You get the broken guitar + $100 for repairs and he keeps $400 from you and $200 for repairs.
The last option doesn't make sense.
You read it wrong
1) I keep the broken guitar + $100.00 and he keeps $400.00 (from me) and $200.00 (from UPS)
The REPAIR COST = >>$350.00<< (Although I may be able to get it down a little and pocket it)
So it costs 88% of the replacement value of the guitar to get it repaired? :roll:
Originally posted by: codeyf
Seller is a fvcktard. You should either get:
A: Full refund of $400 for the guitar; you return it to him.
or
B: You get the $ equivalet to the actual repair cost for the guitar.
If it is neither of those, CHARGEBACK all the way.
Originally posted by: czech09
Originally posted by: codeyf
Seller is a fvcktard. You should either get:
A: Full refund of $400 for the guitar; you return it to him.
or
B: You get the $ equivalet to the actual repair cost for the guitar.
If it is neither of those, CHARGEBACK all the way.
I'd say if the buyer paid for insurance, he's entitled to the full $300 regardless of how much the repair actually costs.
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: TuxDave
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Basically, my question is this: (Read the quoted message first)
Isnt it only fair that I get to keep the guitar + get $300.00 in cash (to either pocket or to use for repairs) than for the seller to get my $400.00 (that I sent) and the $300.00 (that UPS sent?)
So...
1) You keep the broken guitar + $300 for repairs and he keeps the $400 from you
2) You get nothing and lose nothing. He gets back a broken guitar and $300 for repairs.
Either or the two options above are fine and "fair".
3) You get the broken guitar + $100 for repairs and he keeps $400 from you and $200 for repairs.
The last option doesn't make sense.
You read it wrong
1) I keep the broken guitar + $100.00 and he keeps $400.00 (from me) and $200.00 (from UPS)
The REPAIR COST = >>$350.00<< (Although I may be able to get it down a little and pocket it)
So it costs 88% of the replacement value of the guitar to get it repaired? :roll:
If I keep the guitar to get it fixed, I only get $100.00 which is $250.00 short
Originally posted by: codeyf
Seller is a fvcktard. You should either get:
A: Full refund of $400 for the guitar; you return it to him.
or
B: You get the $ equivalet to the actual repair cost for the guitar.
If it is neither of those, CHARGEBACK all the way.
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: TuxDave
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Basically, my question is this: (Read the quoted message first)
Isnt it only fair that I get to keep the guitar + get $300.00 in cash (to either pocket or to use for repairs) than for the seller to get my $400.00 (that I sent) and the $300.00 (that UPS sent?)
So...
1) You keep the broken guitar + $300 for repairs and he keeps the $400 from you
2) You get nothing and lose nothing. He gets back a broken guitar and $300 for repairs.
Either or the two options above are fine and "fair".
3) You get the broken guitar + $100 for repairs and he keeps $400 from you and $200 for repairs.
The last option doesn't make sense.
You read it wrong
1) I keep the broken guitar + $100.00 and he keeps $400.00 (from me) and $200.00 (from UPS)
The REPAIR COST = >>$350.00<< (Although I may be able to get it down a little and pocket it)
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
One of two things should happen:
#1: You return the guitar to the seller, he refunds you the $400
#2: You keep the guitar, the seller sends you the $300 in insurance money
$300+broken guitar=$400, just work out who is on what side of that equasion.
Originally posted by: BoomerD
IIRC, a chargeback against Paypal won't do you anygood, unless the douchebag has the $$$ available in his account...right? Did you pay with a credit card? If so, I'd go through the credit card company to do the chargeback, and file with Paypal as well, just to cover your ass...
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: BoomerD
IIRC, a chargeback against Paypal won't do you anygood, unless the douchebag has the $$$ available in his account...right? Did you pay with a credit card? If so, I'd go through the credit card company to do the chargeback, and file with Paypal as well, just to cover your ass...
yes I did use a credit card, so I guess ill chargeback through that then? (Unless it can take more than just the cash in the paypal accnt)