ok. this is why packages have stupid warning lables on them

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
link

/sniped from blog of some lady

One of my five year old?s favorite chores around the house is cleaning scuff marks off the walls, doors, and baseboards with either an Easy Eraser pad, or the real deal, a Mr. Clean Magic Eraser. I purchased a package of Magic Erasers ages ago when they first came out. I remember reading the box, wondering what the ?Magic? component was that cleaned crayon off my walls with ease. No ingredients were listed and absolutely no warnings were on the box, other than ?Do not ingest.?

My package of the Scotchbrite Easy Erasers didn?t have a warning either and since my child knew not to eat the sponges and keep them out of reach of his little brother and sister, it was a chore I happily let him do.

If I had known that both brands (and others like them) contain a harmful alkaline or ?base? chemical (opposite of acid on the pH scale) that can burn your skin, I never would have let my little boy handle them. As you can see from the picture, when the Scotchbrite Easy Eraser was rubbed against his face and chin, he received severe chemical burns. (Update: the products are abrasive and his wounds today look more like skinned knees than burns. But the Poison Control center confirms that the alkaline nature of the products does indeed cause a chemical burn in addition to scraping the skin.)

At first, I thought he was being dramatic. I picked him up, put him on the counter top and washed his face with soap and water. He was screaming in pain. I put some lotion on his face - more agony. I had used a Magic Eraser to remove magic marker from my own knuckles a while back and I couldn?t understand why he was suddenly in pain. Then, almost immediately, the large, shiny, blistering red marks started to spread across his cheeks and chin.

I quickly searched Google.com for ?Magic Eraser Burn? and turned up several results. I was shocked. These completely innocent looking white foam sponges can burn you?





sheesh. she uses it once on herself and her small child copies her and rubs his face with it. he gets burns. she gets pissy because box does not say it can do that.

well duh! just because it says magic eraser does not mean it is really magic! it has to have something that causes stuff to be "erased"

stupid fvcking women.
 

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,938
6
81
If you are using them with bare hards, then it would be useful to know they can cause issues. Most things say "avoid contact with skin" when they may cause issues, and I see no reason for these not to have a similar label.
e.g. Irritating to eyes and skin
Avoid contact with eyes and skin.

Rubbing them on your face is a stupid idea no matter what though.
 

giantpinkbunnyhead

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2005
3,251
1
0
What a moron. She reminds me of the dipsh!t that sued Mazda after getting into a wreck because their owners manual did NOT say that wearing seat belts would not prevent accidents.

 

Trikat

Diamond Member
May 22, 2003
3,384
0
86
Face skin more sensitive to hand skin...
*Common sense*

Doesn't seem like she was a smart one, but she does have a major point about the box labels. It should've said keep away from skin or maybe keep away from children.
Still if she let her kid take those pads she is really freaking dumb. Just look at the box labels, they are meant for even cleaning tough "stains"...!
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Yeah... it's a cleaning product... would she give her kid a bottle of 409 to play with? :roll:

The only cleaning product that is good for you is Windex ;)

At least she isn't suing.
 

xanis

Lifer
Sep 11, 2005
17,571
8
0
What a moron, just because it's a "magic" eraser, doesn't mean it erases marks with magic, there has to be some kind of chemical that removed the marls. Also, notice how when the chemical burns started to spread across her kid's skin, she searched on Google for a solution rather than take him to the hospital. Some people don't deserve to be parents.
 

MrChad

Lifer
Aug 22, 2001
13,507
3
81
Originally posted by: giantpinkbunnyhead
What a moron. She reminds me of the dipsh!t that sued Mazda after getting into a wreck because their owners manual did NOT say that wearing seat belts would not prevent accidents.

:roll:

Note: I have absolutely no intention of suing the company whatsoever. My son is going to be fine. I would simply like the companies to post appropriate warnings on their products.
 

eelw

Lifer
Dec 4, 1999
10,380
5,525
136
It's sad that almost all products have to have an insane amount of warning labels for the stupid.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: blue1friday2
Originally posted by: waggy
link

stupid fvcking women.

yeah because men never do anything stupid...

yawn.

that it? really that it?

****** what a flame! my god im burning!@ noo nooo!

must be armature night.
 

Midlander

Platinum Member
Dec 21, 2002
2,456
1
0
The skin on a person's face is much more delicate than the skin on one's hands. It's also more delicate than one's legs. That's why Nair for your face is different from Nair for legs.

Faces burn easily. Poor kid.
 

blue1friday2

Senior member
Mar 22, 2006
387
0
0
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: blue1friday2
Originally posted by: waggy
link

stupid fvcking women.

yeah because men never do anything stupid...

yawn.

that it? really that it?

****** what a flame! my god im burning!@ noo nooo!

must be armature night.


yeah that's it. I don't have the desire for some long argument. I was just making a simple comment. Crap now I am explaining myself... oh well I might as well post it now.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Originally posted by: Xanis
What a moron, just because it's a "magic" eraser, doesn't mean it erases marks with magic, there has to be some kind of chemical that removed the marls. Also, notice how when the chemical burns started to spread across her kid's skin, she searched on Google for a solution rather than take him to the hospital. Some people don't deserve to be parents.

Ever heard of first aid? I can sometimes take an hour or more before treatment is given in an emergency room. Perhaps you can read the rest of the article - then she called the doctor... then she called the emergency room. ER said to call poison control. Poison control said to put him in a tub for 20 minutes and continuously rinse the burns off.

Hopefully, before you become a parent, you can understand the concept of first aid. Had she taken her son to the ER, as you suggested was the best move, he would have suffered even more.
 

marvdmartian

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2002
5,444
27
91
What a nimrod she is. I guess she missed the big letters on the package that says, "KEEP OUT OF THE REACH OF CHILDREN"!! I just checked a package. It's in lettering 2-3 times bigger than anything surrounding it. Guess they should have put a talking chip on the package, like the greeting cards have, telling her not to let her kid touch it, eh?
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
sheesh, you don't give a kid a cleaning product.

She gonna compalin where she mixes ammonia and bleach and dies because there wasn't a label telling you not to?
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: spidey07
sheesh, you don't give a kid a cleaning product.

She gonna compalin where she mixes ammonia and bleach and dies because there wasn't a label telling you not to?

thats what gets me. she si blameing the makers of the product and NOT herself.

not to mention read the comments on the blog. i really can't beleive how many people are backing her and telling her to sue.
 

KarenMarie

Elite Member
Sep 20, 2003
14,372
6
81
just one thing here...

i notice that your last sentence says "stupid fvcking womEn."

i will take that as a typo and that what you MEANT to post was "stupid fvcking womAn."

Correct?
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
just one thing here...

i notice that your last sentence says "stupid fvcking womEn."

i will take that as a typo and that what you MEANT to post was "stupid fvcking womAn."

Correct?

yeap. was wondering when it would come up. i expected blue1friday2 to say somehting since he/she fist got on me on the post.


i noticed it like 10 minutes after the OP heh.
 

KarenMarie

Elite Member
Sep 20, 2003
14,372
6
81
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
just one thing here...

i notice that your last sentence says "stupid fvcking womEn."

i will take that as a typo and that what you MEANT to post was "stupid fvcking womAn."

Correct?

yeap. was wondering when it would come up. i expected blue1friday2 to say somehting since he/she fist got on me on the post.


i noticed it like 10 minutes after the OP heh.

Well, rest assured that there are some of us women who give our kids crayons, books and other child intended toys to play with and do our best to supervise that they use them as intended, not something stupid.

:)
 

Adam8281

Platinum Member
May 28, 2003
2,181
0
76
You guys are harshing. The Magic Eraser looks and feels like a smooth foam block. It has no odor, isn't wet with any chemical, and the packaging does not mention any chemical ingredients (like a bottle of cleaner would, for example). While it's maybe not the mark of genius, neither is it ludicrous that someone would rub it on their skin without thinking anything of it, just like you might rub a dish sponge on your skin to get off some food, or pen, etc. If a sponge contains caustic chemicals it ought to plainly say so; it's as simple as that. And no, I'm not a person who thinks obvious warning labels should be slapped on anything and everything. But from my use of the Magic Sponge, it seems like this is a legitimate case when a product should carry a warning label simply because it is NOT immediately obvious that there is any danger associated with it.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
just one thing here...

i notice that your last sentence says "stupid fvcking womEn."

i will take that as a typo and that what you MEANT to post was "stupid fvcking womAn."

Correct?

yeap. was wondering when it would come up. i expected blue1friday2 to say somehting since he/she fist got on me on the post.


i noticed it like 10 minutes after the OP heh.

Well, rest assured that there are some of us women who give our kids crayons, books and other child intended toys to play with and do our best to supervise that they use them as intended, not something stupid.

:)


oh i know.

it just blows my mind how stupid and clueless she is. She would rather blame the company then take responsibility for her neglect.
 

GeekDrew

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2000
9,099
19
81
Originally posted by: Adam8281
You guys are harshing. The Magic Eraser looks and feels like a smooth foam block. It has no odor, isn't wet with any chemical, and the packaging does not mention any chemical ingredients (like a bottle of cleaner would, for example). While it's maybe not the mark of genius, neither is it ludicrous that someone would rub it on their skin without thinking anything of it, just like you might rub a dish sponge on your skin to get off some food, or pen, etc. If a sponge contains caustic chemicals it ought to plainly say so; it's as simple as that. And no, I'm not a person who thinks obvious warning labels should be slapped on anything and everything. But from my use of the Magic Sponge, it seems like this is a legitimate case when a product should carry a warning label simply because it is NOT immediately obvious that there is any danger associated with it.

Indeed. Something that is dangerous but that is not immediately obvious -- such as this -- should have warning labels.

The range I just bought has hundreds of warnings in the manual... my favorite is "let burners cool before touching". *That* is a warning that's overkill.