This is a poll for Tea Party and Libertarian people.
Do you support ending the Smithsonian?
If the public wants a big museum, let them pay for one from a private company.
Saying 'yes' means that there will be no more funding for the Smithsonian.
All buildings and all belongings will be sold at auction within one year.
That means 'national treasures'; it means things like tens of millions of mammal bodies, hundreds of millions of invertebrates, and so on.
Where there's any market for them, they'll be sold for money for one purpose, to pay off our debt in part; if not, destroyed.
I don't care for 'but it's not that much money of our budget' answers. Everyone says that about 'their' programs they like.
This one clearly fits the Tea Party/Libertarian ideology of 'the government shouldn't do that, the private sector can.'
If the public doesn't want it enough to pay the private sector for it, get rid of it.
There's no room in the Tea Party/Libertarian ideology for 'we as a community want this service, but want it paid for by holding guns to people's heads extracting their money'.
Now, I'm not voting, this is a poll for those groups. If I did, I'd vote not to end the Smithsonian, but I get to, I support democracy being able to pay for it.
This is an educational thread for Tea Party and Libertarian members to hopefully get them to understand that sometimes, this democracy approach works better.
That the price is too high for getting rid of the things they say they want to under their ideology. Little hope, but it at least makes a point and gives them some info.
Do you support ending the Smithsonian?
If the public wants a big museum, let them pay for one from a private company.
Saying 'yes' means that there will be no more funding for the Smithsonian.
All buildings and all belongings will be sold at auction within one year.
That means 'national treasures'; it means things like tens of millions of mammal bodies, hundreds of millions of invertebrates, and so on.
Where there's any market for them, they'll be sold for money for one purpose, to pay off our debt in part; if not, destroyed.
I don't care for 'but it's not that much money of our budget' answers. Everyone says that about 'their' programs they like.
This one clearly fits the Tea Party/Libertarian ideology of 'the government shouldn't do that, the private sector can.'
If the public doesn't want it enough to pay the private sector for it, get rid of it.
There's no room in the Tea Party/Libertarian ideology for 'we as a community want this service, but want it paid for by holding guns to people's heads extracting their money'.
Now, I'm not voting, this is a poll for those groups. If I did, I'd vote not to end the Smithsonian, but I get to, I support democracy being able to pay for it.
This is an educational thread for Tea Party and Libertarian members to hopefully get them to understand that sometimes, this democracy approach works better.
That the price is too high for getting rid of the things they say they want to under their ideology. Little hope, but it at least makes a point and gives them some info.