Originally posted by: error162
Ok, Just a question, And if you wanna be a funny smarta$$ about it then whats to stop you, Afterall it is a forum!! Even though there are hundreds of conspiracy theories out there, If not thousands!! And I am not talking about UFO Conspiracies!!!! Lets just for the sake of it take the best 50 conspiracies and the ones that are brought up the most and circulate the internet the most. Out of all these conspiracy theories would you think that they are all untrue and everyones a whackjob?? Or is it possible just maybe that at least 1 or more out of all of the circulating theories could be true, Or is every single one of them lies?? We know the government cant keep secrets that long and eventually there would be a leak on any one of these theories eventually, But bye that time it would be too late and the ball has allready started to roll, So seriously I just would like to hear some straight forward answers, responses, input, whatever regarding conspiracy theories regarding your government against its own citizens, Afterall you and I know they only tell you what you want to hear and most of the time its lies shooting out there pieholes. So if at all possible please wiegh in on this. Ps: This is not a Democrat or Republican related question, Its just an overall Government vs the American Populace question . Pss: Excuse my spelling and grammer. Thanxs . Steve.
Here's my basic view:
The biggest group of conspiracies are proven relatively quickly, and viewed as such.
After that, another large group are the situation which most LEND themselves to being conspiracy theories, but are not - the things where there is a clear motive, a clear suspect, a big unanswered question, mysteries, things that are well-suited for pointing a finger and suggesting alternatives.
After that are the real conspiracies that take a long time to uncover. These are relatively rare. Some were suspected to varying degrees before being proven, and some were not.
And then there are the conspiracies that are never proven or suspected - a group I suspect is larger than most expect.
That last group is simply when a group conspires to do wrong and to hide it - and succeeds.
The number of such schemes that are eventually uncovered suggests there should be a whole lot of others that succeed.
It's funny, wnen people look at the long list of CIA activities that have been exposed, they rarely pay attention to the implication that if the CIA isn't so horribly incompetent that everything it does covertly gets exposed, there are many more similar activities people still wrongly think were brought about by innocent means.
I'm not talking about grand schemes here a la Illumanit or secret Bond villains - though there are enough such things already in place, such as the Carlyle Group and many others - but rather specific acts, such as price fixing or insider trading or other actions that are one-time conspiracies.
Coincidentally enough, this morning I was thinking about a scenario which could be typical, and considered whether it would be of interest here. Say you are a US Senator, and one of your constitutents gets into a situation against the government with popular support on his side in your state - say a vet who accuses the military of mistreating him on his medical situation (which is the story that led me to the topic). Say you think the Pentagon has a reasonable defense, but that politically, you will just look like you are protecting the government if you say so, at political cost with your constituents. I can easily imagine in those scenarios that there are 'wink wink, nudge nudge' agreements behind closed doors where the Senator privately expresses his support for the military, while publically demanding they answer the charges, to look like he's fighitng for the soldier, and the military plays along, humbly supplying their case to the Senator, maybe even pretending to act annoyed by his 'excessive zeal', while the Senator reluctantly concludes that the military's defense is just a little too strong to allow for any conclusion wrong was done.
Not much of a conspiracy, but probably the sort of thing that happens a lot - just as when Obama, backing off his pledge to demand no immunity for telecom execs, was suspected of working out a deal with Senate leadership to let him look like he was opppsing immunity, while he reluctantly gave in to a 'compromise' when his efforts lost the vote.