OK JC, Another Automotive Trivia Question!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Iron Woode

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 10, 1999
31,397
12,872
136
Originally posted by: JC
D'oh!

But I think the 4-door wagon was called the Parkwood, at least Stateside ;)

So what about post-'60?
Caprice.
 

JC

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2000
5,855
73
91
Alright, back to Mopars :)


The legendary (not the current wannabe) Hemi almost survived until 1972. What significant change would it have had, had it survived?
 

JC

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2000
5,855
73
91
Originally posted by: Iron Woode
Originally posted by: JC
D'oh!

But I think the 4-door wagon was called the Parkwood, at least Stateside ;)

So what about post-'60?
Caprice.

Ah. But that wasn't until 1966!

 

Iron Woode

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 10, 1999
31,397
12,872
136
Originally posted by: JC
Alright, back to Mopars :)


The legendary (not the current wannabe) Hemi almost survived until 1972. What significant change would it have had, had it survived?
2 rumours were running rampant at the time.

1) the hemi would have to have lower compression and a single carb.

2) the hemi would have to have a smaller displacement.
 

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81
Originally posted by: JC
Let's switch back to Corvettes :p

What was the first year of the ZR-1 Corvette? And what made up the package?

1970, it had a 370HP 350 small block called the LT1.
 

JC

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2000
5,855
73
91
Originally posted by: Iron Woode
Originally posted by: JC
Alright, back to Mopars :)


The legendary (not the current wannabe) Hemi almost survived until 1972. What significant change would it have had, had it survived?
2 rumours were running rampant at the time.

1) the hemi would have to have lower compression and a single carb.

2) the hemi would have to have a smaller displacement.



It would have had a ball-stud valvetrain, as opposed to the shaft setup :)
 

JC

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2000
5,855
73
91
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Originally posted by: JC
Let's switch back to Corvettes :p

What was the first year of the ZR-1 Corvette? And what made up the package?

1970, it had a 370HP 350 small block called the LT1.


Kudos to you :)


This is too fun....but I'm out for the night. Check back tomorrow :D

 

Iron Woode

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 10, 1999
31,397
12,872
136
Originally posted by: JC
Originally posted by: Iron Woode
Originally posted by: JC
Alright, back to Mopars :)


The legendary (not the current wannabe) Hemi almost survived until 1972. What significant change would it have had, had it survived?
2 rumours were running rampant at the time.

1) the hemi would have to have lower compression and a single carb.

2) the hemi would have to have a smaller displacement.



It would have had a ball-stud valvetrain, as opposed to the shaft setup :)
Cool.

I just saw a picture of my dream car. 1966 Buick Widcat GS.

http://www.buicks.net/show_and_shine/66wildcatgs/
 

Pacfanweb

Lifer
Jan 2, 2000
13,158
59
91
Here you go: Until the 90's, and the Viper, I think, what muscle car held Car and Driver's (and pretty much any other mag's) all-time fastest 0-60 time?
 

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81
Pilsnerpete: mainly the torque converter, you need to get upto a speed of around 30MPH before you have enough speed to overpower the slippage.
 

Iron Woode

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 10, 1999
31,397
12,872
136
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Here you go: Until the 90's, and the Viper, I think, what muscle car held Car and Driver's (and pretty much any other mag's) all-time fastest 0-60 time?
Not that stupid Pontiac 2+2 0-60 in 3 secs crap, I hope.
 

Pacfanweb

Lifer
Jan 2, 2000
13,158
59
91
Originally posted by: Iron Woode
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Here you go: Until the 90's, and the Viper, I think, what muscle car held Car and Driver's (and pretty much any other mag's) all-time fastest 0-60 time?
Not that stupid Pontiac 2+2 0-60 in 3 secs crap, I hope.
'Fraid so. 1965 Pontiac Catalina 421 SD. 3.9 seconds. Fastest C&D ever tested for years. Just think what it would do on today's rubber.
 

Pilsnerpete

Platinum Member
Apr 4, 2002
2,060
0
0
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Pilsnerpete: mainly the torque converter, you need to get upto a speed of around 30MPH before you have enough speed to overpower the slippage.

You have to be the 6 million dollar man to get one going then? Okay...so if you're parked on a steep hill--steep enough to go that fast--it would bump start?

Hey Ironwood! What is I (B) TL anyway? I've wondered this for a awhile.:beer:
 

Pacfanweb

Lifer
Jan 2, 2000
13,158
59
91
Originally posted by: Pilsnerpete
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Pilsnerpete: mainly the torque converter, you need to get upto a speed of around 30MPH before you have enough speed to overpower the slippage.

You have to be the 6 million dollar man to get one going then? Okay...so if you're parked on a steep hill--steep enough to go that fast--it would bump start?
No. The engine has to be running for the torque converter to do anything. Rolling a car downhill just spins the output shaft. It isn't connected to the rest of the trans unless you have some hydraulic pressure.

 

Iron Woode

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 10, 1999
31,397
12,872
136
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: Iron Woode
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Here you go: Until the 90's, and the Viper, I think, what muscle car held Car and Driver's (and pretty much any other mag's) all-time fastest 0-60 time?
Not that stupid Pontiac 2+2 0-60 in 3 secs crap, I hope.
'Fraid so. 1965 Pontiac Catalina 421 SD. 3.9 seconds. Fastest C&D ever tested for years. Just think what it would do on today's rubber.
You do realize that no magazine takes that road test seriously? It has been discredited more than 20 years ago.

Also there was no 1965 421 SD. They stopped making the 421 Super Duty in 1963.
 

Pacfanweb

Lifer
Jan 2, 2000
13,158
59
91
Edit: after thinking about it, and doing some surfing, I may be right about the 1965 number. See link below.
I'd love to see a link to someone knowledgeable that discredits that road test, too. I read about it in the 70's and have never seen anything to dispute it.
The car had the 421SD, "swiss cheese" frame, and aluminum front end. If it got traction, there's no reason it couldn't run 3.9. People don't have a problem believing the Cobra was about that fast, no reason a factory race car that likely had more power to make up for a bit more weight couldn't be just as quick.

Go to 1965.
I'll do some more surfing.....I've thought it was 1965 all these years.....the old memory could be failing me....maybe it's time for some DDR.
 

Cyberian

Diamond Member
Jun 17, 2000
9,999
1
0
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Pilsnerpete: mainly the torque converter, you need to get upto a speed of around 30MPH before you have enough speed to overpower the slippage.
About five years ago the battery in my Civic had
died because I left the lights on overnight . I was in a
hurry to get to work on time so I ran into the house to get
my wife to give me a hand to start the car.
I told her to get into our second car, a prehistoric oversized
gas guzzler, and use it to push my car fast enough to start it.
I pointed out to her that because my car had an automatic transmission,
it needed to be pushed at least 30 MPH for it
to start. She said fine, hopped into her car and drove off.
I sat there fuming wondering what can she be doing. A minute
passed by and when I saw her in the rearview mirror coming at
me at about 40 MPH, I realized (Knowing she?s a blonde) that I should
have been A LOT clearer with my directions.


 

Iron Woode

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 10, 1999
31,397
12,872
136
Originally posted by: Cyberian
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Pilsnerpete: mainly the torque converter, you need to get upto a speed of around 30MPH before you have enough speed to overpower the slippage.
About five years ago the battery in my Civic had
died because I left the lights on overnight . I was in a
hurry to get to work on time so I ran into the house to get
my wife to give me a hand to start the car.
I told her to get into our second car, a prehistoric oversized
gas guzzler, and use it to push my car fast enough to start it.
I pointed out to her that because my car had an automatic transmission,
it needed to be pushed at least 30 MPH for it
to start. She said fine, hopped into her car and drove off.
I sat there fuming wondering what can she be doing. A minute
passed by and when I saw her in the rearview mirror coming at
me at about 40 MPH, I realized (Knowing she?s a blonde) that I should
have been A LOT clearer with my directions.
haha. that gets a 5/10.