- Oct 10, 1999
- 31,397
- 12,872
- 136
Caprice.Originally posted by: JC
D'oh!
But I think the 4-door wagon was called the Parkwood, at least Stateside
So what about post-'60?
Caprice.Originally posted by: JC
D'oh!
But I think the 4-door wagon was called the Parkwood, at least Stateside
So what about post-'60?
Originally posted by: Iron Woode
Caprice.Originally posted by: JC
D'oh!
But I think the 4-door wagon was called the Parkwood, at least Stateside
So what about post-'60?
They came out, but weren't mandated until 1968.Originally posted by: Iron Woode
They came out earlier.Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Seat belts.Originally posted by: Iron Woode
One more question:
What federally mandated safety feature was required in 1968.
2 rumours were running rampant at the time.Originally posted by: JC
Alright, back to Mopars
The legendary (not the current wannabe) Hemi almost survived until 1972. What significant change would it have had, had it survived?
Originally posted by: JC
Let's switch back to Corvettes
What was the first year of the ZR-1 Corvette? And what made up the package?
Originally posted by: Iron Woode
2 rumours were running rampant at the time.Originally posted by: JC
Alright, back to Mopars
The legendary (not the current wannabe) Hemi almost survived until 1972. What significant change would it have had, had it survived?
1) the hemi would have to have lower compression and a single carb.
2) the hemi would have to have a smaller displacement.
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Originally posted by: JC
Let's switch back to Corvettes
What was the first year of the ZR-1 Corvette? And what made up the package?
1970, it had a 370HP 350 small block called the LT1.
Impala, Biscayne, Bel Air?Originally posted by: JC
D'oh!
But I think the 4-door wagon was called the Parkwood, at least Stateside
So what about post-'60?
Cool.Originally posted by: JC
Originally posted by: Iron Woode
2 rumours were running rampant at the time.Originally posted by: JC
Alright, back to Mopars
The legendary (not the current wannabe) Hemi almost survived until 1972. What significant change would it have had, had it survived?
1) the hemi would have to have lower compression and a single carb.
2) the hemi would have to have a smaller displacement.
It would have had a ball-stud valvetrain, as opposed to the shaft setup![]()
Originally posted by: JC
Here's one: what was the last year you could push-start a Torqueflight-automatic car?
Not that stupid Pontiac 2+2 0-60 in 3 secs crap, I hope.Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Here you go: Until the 90's, and the Viper, I think, what muscle car held Car and Driver's (and pretty much any other mag's) all-time fastest 0-60 time?
Nope, but you have the right manufacturer.Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Pontiac Firebird, Ram Air IV (or was it V?). 0-60 in 4.0 or 4.1
'Fraid so. 1965 Pontiac Catalina 421 SD. 3.9 seconds. Fastest C&D ever tested for years. Just think what it would do on today's rubber.Originally posted by: Iron Woode
Not that stupid Pontiac 2+2 0-60 in 3 secs crap, I hope.Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Here you go: Until the 90's, and the Viper, I think, what muscle car held Car and Driver's (and pretty much any other mag's) all-time fastest 0-60 time?
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Pilsnerpete: mainly the torque converter, you need to get upto a speed of around 30MPH before you have enough speed to overpower the slippage.
No. The engine has to be running for the torque converter to do anything. Rolling a car downhill just spins the output shaft. It isn't connected to the rest of the trans unless you have some hydraulic pressure.Originally posted by: Pilsnerpete
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Pilsnerpete: mainly the torque converter, you need to get upto a speed of around 30MPH before you have enough speed to overpower the slippage.
You have to be the 6 million dollar man to get one going then? Okay...so if you're parked on a steep hill--steep enough to go that fast--it would bump start?
You do realize that no magazine takes that road test seriously? It has been discredited more than 20 years ago.Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
'Fraid so. 1965 Pontiac Catalina 421 SD. 3.9 seconds. Fastest C&D ever tested for years. Just think what it would do on today's rubber.Originally posted by: Iron Woode
Not that stupid Pontiac 2+2 0-60 in 3 secs crap, I hope.Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Here you go: Until the 90's, and the Viper, I think, what muscle car held Car and Driver's (and pretty much any other mag's) all-time fastest 0-60 time?
About five years ago the battery in my Civic hadOriginally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Pilsnerpete: mainly the torque converter, you need to get upto a speed of around 30MPH before you have enough speed to overpower the slippage.
haha. that gets a 5/10.Originally posted by: Cyberian
About five years ago the battery in my Civic hadOriginally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Pilsnerpete: mainly the torque converter, you need to get upto a speed of around 30MPH before you have enough speed to overpower the slippage.
died because I left the lights on overnight . I was in a
hurry to get to work on time so I ran into the house to get
my wife to give me a hand to start the car.
I told her to get into our second car, a prehistoric oversized
gas guzzler, and use it to push my car fast enough to start it.
I pointed out to her that because my car had an automatic transmission,
it needed to be pushed at least 30 MPH for it
to start. She said fine, hopped into her car and drove off.
I sat there fuming wondering what can she be doing. A minute
passed by and when I saw her in the rearview mirror coming at
me at about 40 MPH, I realized (Knowing she?s a blonde) that I should
have been A LOT clearer with my directions.
