Ok if you had a budget of 120$ for a processor and a motherboard. . .

episodic

Lifer
Feb 7, 2004
11,088
2
81
And you had to pick the one that did media encoding the fastest (#1 concern) - what would you pick?

I've heard that Intel chips are better at media encoding. . .

 

DrCool

Senior member
Aug 3, 2001
871
0
76
well, the problems begin at 'had a budget of $120..'

I know it's hard to have patience, and save.. but your not going to get any value out of a motherboard/cpu combo that only costs $120.. think DOUBLE that, and you'll have a good place to start.

now, you could get a Sempron 3100+ socket 754 for $120, and a matching motherboard for about $95.. but if you wanted to go intel, your looking at about double the cost, for that same performance.
 

icejunkie

Platinum Member
Oct 2, 2004
2,326
0
0
Originally posted by: episodic
And you had to pick the one that did media encoding the fastest (#1 concern) - what would you pick?

I've heard that Intel chips are better at media encoding. . .

I'd pick a bigger budget :p
 

The J

Senior member
Aug 30, 2004
755
0
76
On TomsHardware, there was a huge (106 CPUs, I think) processor comparison which was done with media encoding programs and games. Look up the media encoding benchmarks there and find a processor that isn't top of the line, but will still give you a result that you can live with.
 

BW86

Lifer
Jul 20, 2004
13,114
30
91
Originally posted by: episodic
Ok 200$ - but that'd be stretching - anything cheaper appreciated.
For $200, I would probably get a A64 2800 with a Chaintech VNF3.
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
NF7-s and 2400M + HSF and OC that shit. Should be about $200, and reach about 2.4-2.5 or more ghz. Still probably the best value around, although the sempron and A64 3000 are coming close. The problem with intel is the cheap intel stuff isn't that cheap. :(
 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
save money.
[
live with what you have for a while longer, even if it means other parts just sitting there. After a month you should have more cash.
 

Anonemous

Diamond Member
May 19, 2003
7,361
1
71
Originally posted by: DrCool
Originally posted by: Anonemous
how does that compare to a mobile 2500 oc'd with nf2 board?


oh, like nite and day!

see for yourself:
http://www.tomshardware.com/cp...221/cpu_charts-13.html

i only see up to 3200+ 2.2 ghz bartons what about 2.4-2.5 ghz? extrapolating from that graph it seems it would only lose to a 3200+ newcastle (2.2 ghz) by tens of points assuming you can oc that 2800+ a64 from 1.8ghz to 2.2ghz (which you can according to newegg reviews).
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
For video encoding, that shows the XPs competing rather well, much better than they do for gaming.

If episodic really only cares about video encoding, and is willing to spend $160-175, the top choices at stock speed are a Sempron 2800+ and the slightly faster Celeron D 2.8 GHz, both $109 retail with HSF. Add a $50-60 mobo and you're set.

Of course for $200, the socket 754 A64 2800+ plus chanintech nf3 mb offers a tiny speed improvement for encoding (2%) but a huge improvement in gaming performance, especially compared to the Celeron.