Originally posted by: Grasshopper27
*wimper*Originally posted by: Imdmn04
for those who drives suvs, haha, sucks to be you
/me drives Suburban
: ) Hopper
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Hector13
The fact that (in my opinion, obviously), they more truly reflect the real price of gas.
what would those other costs be, in your opinion?
Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech
Northern VA is actually $1.73 - $1.74 at Exxon, Shell and Mobil stations. When I head for Pr. Wm. county, Sheetz and others are still $1.57 - but that was before the other stations raised their prices by $.05 a gallon. So, I'm sure the $1.57 figure broke $1.60 before the day was over.Originally posted by: pg19
Originally posted by: Azraele
Ouch.
$1.57 last I checked in VA. Might have gone up.
wow...what was it two months ago?
Sure, we're paying less than the Californians are paying. However, it's all relative. When gas jumps by $.50 a gallon, that's the price of the increase across the board. We were used to paying $1.15 a gallong just like someone from California was used to paying $1.60 a gallon. The price jump has been equally damaging no matter where you live.
Originally posted by: Grasshopper27
Of course I'm not, I was just being funny... I do have big feet however, I wear size 12!
I drive a Suburban and I don't even have kids yet. Thumper drives a Honda Accord, but that should be corrected soon enough, I'm going to get her a Dodge Durango. Decent price, mid-size SUV with enough armor to keep her safe!
Got to protect my favorite wabbit!
: ) Hopper
The Durango is not my first choice for reliability, but it has a lot more armor than the Accord does.Originally posted by: conjur
Ooof...passing up a very reliable car for something that will need a new transmission at 100k miles not to mention problems with power windows, power steering, head gaskets, etc. Chrysler's reliability is sh!t. That's why I'm on my last domestic make.
You haven't been to Texas recently, have you? More SUVs and full size pickups are sold here than cars. It is simple self-defense, you have to own a big truck here to survive an accident.And the Durango being safer? Misconception. That SUV will take longer to stop, won't corner as well, and won't perform emergency lane change maneuvers as quickly and safely as that Honda Accord. As for accidents, that Accord will hold its own against most anything out there (save a Freightliner or an Amtrak...but then nothing out there will).
Originally posted by: Bleep
It is always funny when the swiss or others talk about gas prices, heck you can drive clear across their country with 10 gallons.
Bleep
Originally posted by: Bleep
It is always funny when the swiss or others talk about gas prices, heck you can drive clear across their country with 10 gallons.
Bleep
Originally posted by: Hector13
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Hector13
The fact that (in my opinion, obviously), they more truly reflect the real price of gas.
what would those other costs be, in your opinion?
uhm... lets see, pollution? how about the costs of war in the middle east? Or what about the cost of keeping our "Strategic Petroleum Reserve"? We might as well add the government's cost for regulations and enforcement.
Of course, going beyond just gas, there are other social costs for driving in general (ie, increased congestion, maintenance of highways, etc.)
Originally posted by: Grasshopper27
That Accord will be ripped to peices if a Suburban crashes into it. That Durango will hold up much better due to the larger mass of the vehicle.
That is one of the reasons I drive a Suburban. Part of the price I pay in purchase price and fuel is simply my way of paying for armor protection. 6,000lbs of it...
Considering that I'm not even going to bother getting the ding on my bumper fixed, and that the Sentra that hit me needs almost $5,000 in repairs to fix, I think the money is well spent.
I want Thumper to get a Tahoe, but she says they are too big for her. Grr...
: ) Hopper
