OJ Simpson - "If I did it" leaked...

0

Golden Member
Jul 22, 2003
1,270
0
0
January 15, 2007 -- The controversial shelved book "If I Did It" - the so-called make-believe account by O.J. Simpson of how he would have killed his ex-wife Nicole and her friend Ron Goldman - describes her as the "enemy" who came at him like a "banshee" the night her throat was slit, according to excerpts leaked to Newsweek magazine.

The book, which provoked a public outcry and was never published, includes in the key chapter "The Night in Question" a play-by-play account of what could have happened the night of June 12, 1994.

Much of his "fictional" account coincides with the bloody evidence presented at the sensational trial.

Using what Newsweek describes as the "crude, expletive-laced . . . classic language of a wife abuser," Simpson suggests Nicole Brown Simpson all but drove him to kill her.

He describes her as the "enemy . . . taunting him with her sexual dalliances . . . and carrying on inappropriately in front of their two children," Newsweek says.

On the "night in question," Simpson says he had left his daughter Sydney's dance recital "in a foul mood . . . stewing over the behavior of his ex-wife," the report says.

"He races to Nicole's Bundy Drive condo before boarding a plane to Chicago.

"He parks in the dark alley behind her condo and dons the knit wool cap and gloves he keeps handy to ward off the chill on the golf course," according to the magazine's account of the book.

"He also has a knife in the Bronco . . . for protection against L.A. 'crazies.' He intends to scare her.

"He enters through a broken gate and encounters Goldman."

Simpson accuses Goldman of planning a sexual encounter with Nicole, which Goldman denies. Nicole tells Simpson to leave Ron alone. Goldman's fate is sealed when Kato, Nicole's Akita, emerges and gives [Goldman] a friendly tail wag, according to Newsweek.

" 'You've been here before,' the killer screams at Goldman.

Simpson says when he regains control of himself, "he realizes he is drenched in blood and holding a bloody knife," Newsweek says.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/01152007/ne...rder_nationalnews_cynthia_r__fagen.htm

 

kedlav

Senior member
Aug 2, 2006
632
0
0
zomg, book details seem to match publicly available details. If you didn't realize OJ did it before the book came out, you're mentally deficient already, this book/story won't change much upstairs...
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
thanks to the internets.. and a certain rotten site i've seen their dead bodies and sh*t already..think thats enough. grisly
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
i'm confused. if this book is about how he would do it, why is pretty much exactly like it happened?

 

silverpig

Lifer
Jul 29, 2001
27,703
12
81
Originally posted by: pontifex
i'm confused. if this book is about how he would do it, why is pretty much exactly like it happened?

Well he's still looking for the real killer you know.
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: pontifex
i'm confused. if this book is about how he would do it, why is pretty much exactly like it happened?
umm... now i'm confused.

:confused:
read what you posted again.

maybe i'm not understanding the the concept of the book.

the book is supposed to be about how he would have killed her, right?
what he wrote is pretty much how it went down, right?
i'm thinking he was supposed to write how he would have killed her, like put an explosive device in her car or poisoned her.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,584
984
126
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: pontifex
i'm confused. if this book is about how he would do it, why is pretty much exactly like it happened?
umm... now i'm confused.

:confused:
read what you posted again.

maybe i'm not understanding the the concept of the book.

the book is supposed to be about how he would have killed her, right?
what he wrote is pretty much how it went down, right?
i'm thinking he was supposed to write how he would have killed her, like put an explosive device in her car or poisoned her.

No, it's his way of giving the rest of us the finger. Since he did actually kill her and Goldman.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,390
19,708
146
O.J. says a chapter in his book 'If I Did It' is not a confessional.

Newsweek Publishes Piece of O.J.'s Book
By LINDA DEUTSCH
AP
LOS ANGELES (Jan. 14) - O.J. Simpson says a chapter from his unpublished book that hypothesizes how he would have killed his ex-wife and her friend was created mostly from a ghostwriter's research and is not a confession.

"I'm saying it's a fictional creation," Simpson said Sunday in a telephone interview. "It has so many (factual) holes in it that anybody who knew anything about it would know that I didn't write it."

His comments came as Newsweek published a story for its current issue paraphrasing the chapter, called "The Night in Question," which the magazine said it had obtained from an anonymous source.

Simpson was acquitted of the 1994 murders of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and Ron Goldman after a yearlong trial. A civil jury later held him liable for the killings. On Sunday, Simpson again denied killing the couple.

Simpson declined to provide a copy of the chapter to The Associated Press.

"I don't have it," he said. "I shredded everything I had about it, and I thought I shredded it from my memory."

Newsweek's account of the chapter describes Simpson as becoming angry with his ex-wife at his daughter's dance recital. He later went to her condominium to scare her, entering with a knife through a back gate with a broken latch, the account states.

Simpson encountered Goldman and accused him of planning a sexual encounter with Nicole. He became enraged when Nicole's Akita dog appeared to recognize Goldman as a familiar visitor, the account states.

Nicole rushed at Simpson and fell, hitting her head on the ground, according to the account. Goldman then took a karate stance, further angering Simpson, who dared Goldman to fight before pulling back.

"Then something went horribly wrong, and I know what happened, but I can't tell you exactly how," Newsweek quoted Simpson as writing.

The account contains no descriptions of the actual killings but says Simpson was drenched in blood and holding a bloody knife when he regained control of himself. Both victims were dead.

The ghostwriter of "If I Did It" knew nothing about the case when he came into the project and had to do a lot of research, Simpson said. The writer was not a witness at the criminal trial, as has been reported, Simpson said.

Simpson said he saw a number of factual flaws while proofreading the chapter but did not correct them because he thought that would prove that he did not write it, he said.

Author Laurence Schiller, whose book "American Tragedy" contains a detailed account of the crime and its aftermath, said he was contacted last November by someone who read the chapter to him.

"There's not a fact in there that wasn't previously printed or was in the trial discovery papers," Schiller said.

Schiller agreed with Simpson that there are technical flaws in the chapter, including the claim that Simpson entered Nicole's home through a broken back gate. Both Schiller and Simpson said the front gate had the broken latch.

The book was to be published on Nov. 30 by News Corp.-owned HarperCollins. News Corp. head Rupert Murdoch called off the project 10 days before, apologizing for any pain that it had caused the families of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson.

When the proposal for a book was brought to him, he implored the publishers not to include the "created half-chapter" about the killings, he said.

However, "they said it was the hook that would sell the book," Simpson said.

He said he elicited a promise that there would be no descriptions of anyone being killed, something he feared would upset his children.

"Was it tacky?" he said. "Yes, it was tacky. But it was brought to me. I didn't have an agent out there saying, here's a book from O.J."

He said he agreed to the book because he needed the money for his family.

"I knew going in it would be what it would be," he said. "It was worth it. I made a decision that it would benefit my family and my life. I don't have any regrets."
 

SarcasticDwarf

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2001
9,574
2
76
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: pontifex
i'm confused. if this book is about how he would do it, why is pretty much exactly like it happened?
umm... now i'm confused.

:confused:
read what you posted again.

maybe i'm not understanding the the concept of the book.

the book is supposed to be about how he would have killed her, right?
what he wrote is pretty much how it went down, right?
i'm thinking he was supposed to write how he would have killed her, like put an explosive device in her car or poisoned her.

You think wrong and have a poor understanding of the nuances of the English language.
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
Originally posted by: SarcasticDwarf
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: pontifex
i'm confused. if this book is about how he would do it, why is pretty much exactly like it happened?
umm... now i'm confused.

:confused:
read what you posted again.

maybe i'm not understanding the the concept of the book.

the book is supposed to be about how he would have killed her, right?
what he wrote is pretty much how it went down, right?
i'm thinking he was supposed to write how he would have killed her, like put an explosive device in her car or poisoned her.

You think wrong and have a poor understanding of the nuances of the English language.

so explain it to me since i'm a big dumb noob...
 

Randum

Platinum Member
Jan 28, 2004
2,473
0
76
its just his guilty concious, he needs to say how he did it to make himself feel better, and make some money cause hes broke
 

MrChad

Lifer
Aug 22, 2001
13,507
3
81
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: SarcasticDwarf
Originally posted by: pontifex
maybe i'm not understanding the the concept of the book.

the book is supposed to be about how he would have killed her, right?
what he wrote is pretty much how it went down, right?
i'm thinking he was supposed to write how he would have killed her, like put an explosive device in her car or poisoned her.

You think wrong and have a poor understanding of the nuances of the English language.

so explain it to me since i'm a big dumb noob...

The book was originally marketed as a "hypothetical" story that describes how O.J. would have done it had he killed her. However, the details of the book are pretty much a full blown confession to the murders and follow the actual events fairly closely.

Since O.J. was already acquitted on both murder charges, he can't be tried again. This may be his cowardly way of admitting his guilt. The book was written obviously in very poor taste.