• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

OJ Simpson Guilty on all 12 Charges

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Does anyone actually think anything will happen to him in prison? He's a in shape knife wielding double murderer ex-football player - he'll probably have his own gang of suck-ups. It'll probably be better than being out in public with everyone looking at him like he got away with murder.

That said, OJ needs to get Al Cowlings to break his ass out of jail in a Bronco. RUN JUICE, RUN!

Maybe hide at Kato's place.

 
Simpson said he felt melancholy and that he was "afraid that I won't get to go to my kids' college graduations after I managed to get them through college."

Galanter said it was not a happy day for anybody. "His only hope is the appellate process," he said.

I beg to differ. It was a happy day for every American with an IQ above 100 who realized he was a murdering piece of shit.
 
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Simpson said he felt melancholy and that he was "afraid that I won't get to go to my kids' college graduations after I managed to get them through college."

Galanter said it was not a happy day for anybody. "His only hope is the appellate process," he said.

I beg to differ. It was a happy day for every American with an IQ above 100 who realized he was a murdering piece of shit.

hear! hear!
 
Originally posted by: ed21x
15 years to life on a supposed armed robbery? this is a bit harsh when judging on this specific case alone. however, since we all know that OJ was guilty of the murder, this sort of balances it all out.

uh, it's not supposed when he's found guilty.
 
Honestly, I think this was just a "makeup conviction" similar to how NFL refs will call phantom penalties when they miss a big one. I don't know that there was enough believable evidence in this case to convict him of all charges, but I'm sure his past had a huge impact on the deliberations.
 
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Honestly, I think this was just a "makeup conviction" similar to how NFL refs will call phantom penalties when they miss a big one. I don't know that there was enough believable evidence in this case to convict him of all charges, but I'm sure his past had a huge impact on the deliberations.

Um, the whole thing was on video. He was guilty, there was no wiggle room for the defense.
 
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Honestly, I think this was just a "makeup conviction" similar to how NFL refs will call phantom penalties when they miss a big one. I don't know that there was enough believable evidence in this case to convict him of all charges, but I'm sure his past had a huge impact on the deliberations.

Um, the whole thing was on video. He was guilty, there was no wiggle room for the defense.

Dont you mean audio?
 
Originally posted by: tboo
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Honestly, I think this was just a "makeup conviction" similar to how NFL refs will call phantom penalties when they miss a big one. I don't know that there was enough believable evidence in this case to convict him of all charges, but I'm sure his past had a huge impact on the deliberations.

Um, the whole thing was on video. He was guilty, there was no wiggle room for the defense.

Dont you mean audio?
Yeah.

Regardless, Cochran couldn't have even gotten him out of this one.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: tboo
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Honestly, I think this was just a "makeup conviction" similar to how NFL refs will call phantom penalties when they miss a big one. I don't know that there was enough believable evidence in this case to convict him of all charges, but I'm sure his past had a huge impact on the deliberations.

Um, the whole thing was on video. He was guilty, there was no wiggle room for the defense.

Dont you mean audio?
Yeah.

Regardless, Cochran couldn't have even gotten him out of this one.

Cockran could of gotten him off, if the audio doesnt fit you must aquit, he would of said Furman or someone planted Simpsons voice at the scene.
 
Back
Top