OJ Did It

[waggy]

Originally posted by: crystal

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: steppinthrax
OK so what your saying is that you care and get angry about OJ getting off but you don't care about a german who shoved several Jews into furnaces (with no justification for such a murder(s)).

wow.

I see nothing wrong with his response to her "why am i supposed to give a f*ck?".

The court ruled him not guilty. That mean he is not guilty in the eyes to laws. You sure as hell don't want to change the system where you are guilty until proven innonce.

care to point out where anyone said they want to change it to guilty until proven innocent (though it seems that way with rape and child molestation).


his response was idiotic. he is just trying to stire up emotions by bringing up the Nazis. it just does not work.


not to mention the way he got there was a major stretch.

 

[waggy]

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: steppinthrax

And how many times throughout the history of the US justice system has this been done. Just look at Hilton and the fact that she got out of jail early (went back shortly after). Whenever you are rich/famous you will find the laws of justice apply to you very differently. People with money who can hire multiple attorneys can delay and reduce penalties for the very illegal acts they commit.

paris is actually getting a more harsh sentence than about 90% of people convicted of driving with a suspended license.

but don't let facts get in the way of your politics.

I agree. she shouldnt have got 45 days. i can see a few but thats insane.

BUT once she got in the sheriff letting her out was nuts also. neither should have happened.

 

[SoulAssassin]

Originally posted by: steppinthrax

Originally posted by: CrackRabbit

Originally posted by: steppinthrax

OK so what your saying is that you care and get angry about OJ getting off but you don't care about a german who shoved several Jews into furnaces (with no justification for such a murder(s)).

Ever here of this little thing called the Nuremburg Trials?

Read up on it sometime before talking out of your ass.

So your saying they caught everybody responsible during the nuremburg trails. No, in the past they have found others who passed though the cracks.

Please GTFO of my thread.

 

[crystal]

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: crystal

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: steppinthrax
OK so what your saying is that you care and get angry about OJ getting off but you don't care about a german who shoved several Jews into furnaces (with no justification for such a murder(s)).

wow.

I see nothing wrong with his response to her "why am i supposed to give a f*ck?".

The court ruled him not guilty. That mean he is not guilty in the eyes to laws. You sure as hell don't want to change the system where you are guilty until proven innonce.

care to point out where anyone said they want to change it to guilty until proven innocent (though it seems that way with rape and child molestation).


his response was idiotic. he is just trying to stire up emotions by bringing up the Nazis. it just does not work.


not to mention the way he got there was a major stretch.

That was his point. Make long stretch to point out why people still go apesh*t everytime OJ name was mention.

 

[waggy]

Originally posted by: crystal

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: crystal

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: steppinthrax
OK so what your saying is that you care and get angry about OJ getting off but you don't care about a german who shoved several Jews into furnaces (with no justification for such a murder(s)).

wow.

I see nothing wrong with his response to her "why am i supposed to give a f*ck?".

The court ruled him not guilty. That mean he is not guilty in the eyes to laws. You sure as hell don't want to change the system where you are guilty until proven innonce.

care to point out where anyone said they want to change it to guilty until proven innocent (though it seems that way with rape and child molestation).


his response was idiotic. he is just trying to stire up emotions by bringing up the Nazis. it just does not work.


not to mention the way he got there was a major stretch.

That was his point. Make long stretch to point out why people still go apesh*t everytime OJ name was mention.

pft.
people go apepoop because he got away with it. he was on trail and found not guilty. teh few nazi people that got away were not on trail. did they catch them all? no. wel all know that.

to compare the two is idiotic

 

[JulesMaximus]

Originally posted by: steppinthrax
If OJ was white and did this and of course got off would it of made you feel a little better. This situation was going on around the same time as the JonBenét Ramsey incident and you could easily draw race conclusions based on how the parents of this missing girl were being treated v.s. O.J. Both had money, both were well known, but OJ was black. I don't believe OJ is innocent but he worked the jutice system (attorneys) in his favor. So many people in this world works the jutice system and gets away with it. People around the world hated it because you have a black dude who got away will killing a white woman.

You are so wrong about that it's not even funny. This has nothing to do with a black man killing a white woman, not for me anyway. It has everything to do with a guy who was acquitted of murder when there was so much compelling evidence that he did it. He had motive, there was physical evidence linking him to the scene of the crime and he had no solid alibi...come on, how could anyone not think that he did it? You'd have to be a complete idiot not to see it.

BTW-I watched the Scott Peterson trial (white guy killed his white wife) with great interest too because they had less evidence in that case but they still managed to convict him of murdering his wife and unborn baby boy.

 

[waggy]

Originally posted by: JulesMaximus

Originally posted by: steppinthrax
If OJ was white and did this and of course got off would it of made you feel a little better. This situation was going on around the same time as the JonBenét Ramsey incident and you could easily draw race conclusions based on how the parents of this missing girl were being treated v.s. O.J. Both had money, both were well known, but OJ was black. I don't believe OJ is innocent but he worked the jutice system (attorneys) in his favor. So many people in this world works the jutice system and gets away with it. People around the world hated it because you have a black dude who got away will killing a white woman.

You are so wrong about that it's not even funny. This has nothing to do with a black man killing a white woman, not for me anyway. It has everything to do with a guy who was acquitted of murder when there was so much compelling evidence that he did it. He had motive, there was physical evidence linking him to the scene of the crime and he had no solid alibi...come on, how could anyone not think that he did it? You'd have to be a complete idiot not to see it.

BTW-I watched the Scott Peterson trial (white guy killed his white wife) with great interest too because they had less evidence in that case but they still managed to convict him of murdering his wife and unborn baby boy.

not only did they have less evidance they had all that crap with the jury.

heh but thats a diffrent thread.

 

[JulesMaximus]

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: JulesMaximus

Originally posted by: steppinthrax
If OJ was white and did this and of course got off would it of made you feel a little better. This situation was going on around the same time as the JonBenét Ramsey incident and you could easily draw race conclusions based on how the parents of this missing girl were being treated v.s. O.J. Both had money, both were well known, but OJ was black. I don't believe OJ is innocent but he worked the jutice system (attorneys) in his favor. So many people in this world works the jutice system and gets away with it. People around the world hated it because you have a black dude who got away will killing a white woman.

You are so wrong about that it's not even funny. This has nothing to do with a black man killing a white woman, not for me anyway. It has everything to do with a guy who was acquitted of murder when there was so much compelling evidence that he did it. He had motive, there was physical evidence linking him to the scene of the crime and he had no solid alibi...come on, how could anyone not think that he did it? You'd have to be a complete idiot not to see it.

BTW-I watched the Scott Peterson trial (white guy killed his white wife) with great interest too because they had less evidence in that case but they still managed to convict him of murdering his wife and unborn baby boy.

not only did they have less evidance they had all that crap with the jury.

heh but thats a diffrent thread.

It's more pertinent to this topic than nazis though. :laugh: God, I can't even believe he brought up nazis...where the fsck did that come from?

 

[steppinthrax]

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: steppinthrax

And how many times throughout the history of the US justice system has this been done. Just look at Hilton and the fact that she got out of jail early (went back shortly after). Whenever you are rich/famous you will find the laws of justice apply to you very differently. People with money who can hire multiple attorneys can delay and reduce penalties for the very illegal acts they commit.

paris is actually getting a more harsh sentence than about 90% of people convicted of driving with a suspended license.

but don't let facts get in the way of your politics.

I agree. she shouldnt have got 45 days. i can see a few but thats insane.

BUT once she got in the sheriff letting her out was nuts also. neither should have happened.

The reason why she got more then she should is because she had no regard for the judge while she was in for violation of parole. She was accepting cell phone calls while in front of the judge. She was disrespectful in front of the judge and everyone knows what happens when you disrespect the judge.

 

[SoulAssassin]

Originally posted by: steppinthrax

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: steppinthrax

And how many times throughout the history of the US justice system has this been done. Just look at Hilton and the fact that she got out of jail early (went back shortly after). Whenever you are rich/famous you will find the laws of justice apply to you very differently. People with money who can hire multiple attorneys can delay and reduce penalties for the very illegal acts they commit.

paris is actually getting a more harsh sentence than about 90% of people convicted of driving with a suspended license.

but don't let facts get in the way of your politics.

I agree. she shouldnt have got 45 days. i can see a few but thats insane.

BUT once she got in the sheriff letting her out was nuts also. neither should have happened.

The reason why she got more then she should is because she had no regard for the judge while she was in for violation of parole. She was accepting cell phone calls while in front of the judge. She was disrespectful in front of the judge and everyone knows what happens when you disrespect the judge.

Didn't I tell you to GTFO?

 

[waggy]

Originally posted by: SoulAssassin

Originally posted by: steppinthrax

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: steppinthrax

And how many times throughout the history of the US justice system has this been done. Just look at Hilton and the fact that she got out of jail early (went back shortly after). Whenever you are rich/famous you will find the laws of justice apply to you very differently. People with money who can hire multiple attorneys can delay and reduce penalties for the very illegal acts they commit.

paris is actually getting a more harsh sentence than about 90% of people convicted of driving with a suspended license.

but don't let facts get in the way of your politics.

I agree. she shouldnt have got 45 days. i can see a few but thats insane.

BUT once she got in the sheriff letting her out was nuts also. neither should have happened.

The reason why she got more then she should is because she had no regard for the judge while she was in for violation of parole. She was accepting cell phone calls while in front of the judge. She was disrespectful in front of the judge and everyone knows what happens when you disrespect the judge.

Didn't I tell you to GTFO?

you can tell him 1000000000 times and it still wouldnt matter.

 

[fLum0x]

Originally posted by: ElFenix
who is this charlie person?

that horse. Search "charlie the horse" on youtube and you will see him.

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: crystal

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: steppinthrax
OK so what your saying is that you care and get angry about OJ getting off but you don't care about a german who shoved several Jews into furnaces (with no justification for such a murder(s)).

wow.

I see nothing wrong with his response to her "why am i supposed to give a f*ck?".

The court ruled him not guilty. That mean he is not guilty in the eyes to laws. You sure as hell don't want to change the system where you are guilty until proven innonce.

Tell that to the Duke Lacrosse Players who got railroaded.