• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Ohio judge denies recount request

MidasKnight

Diamond Member
CNN


Relating to this thread:

Text


Updated.


TOLEDO, Ohio (AP) -- A federal judge denied a request by third-party presidential candidates who wanted to force a recount of Ohio ballots even before the official count was finished.

Judge James G. Carr in Toledo ruled Tuesday that the candidates have a right under Ohio law to a recount, but said it can wait. The judge wrote that he saw no reason to interfere with the final stages of Ohio's electoral process. Officials have said the results will be certified by December 6.
 
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Makes sense to me, get an "official" count before starting a recount.
Ah ok, makes sense.

Far less underhanded than I expected when I first read the thread title
 
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Makes sense to me, get an "official" count before starting a recount.
Ah ok, makes sense.

Far less underhanded than I expected when I first read the thread title

Hmm, biased thread titles again? 😀

And this time it's CNN's fault. Who thinks up these headlines?
 
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Makes sense to me, get an "official" count before starting a recount.
Ah ok, makes sense.

Far less underhanded than I expected when I first read the thread title

Hmm, biased thread titles again? 😀

And this time it's CNN's fault. Who thinks up these headlines?
Who knows...but the link made me click (and see ads) so...
 
Back
Top