Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: FoBoT
he was a great man
Antonin Scalia will be the next Chief justice
I say Clarence Thomas
Long dong silver?
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: FoBoT
he was a great man
Antonin Scalia will be the next Chief justice
I say Clarence Thomas
Originally posted by: Eli
Why should I care about this again?
Originally posted by: RMSistight
Originally posted by: Eli
Why should I care about this again?
More conservative judge appointments for an already divided Supreme Court.
Originally posted by: RMSistight
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: FoBoT
he was a great man
Antonin Scalia will be the next Chief justice
I say Clarence Thomas
A black man as Chief Justice? Not that I have a problem with it but don't you think the voters for Bush will have a problem with it? Aren't chief justices traditionally white like Presidents? If Clarence Thomas becomes Chief Justice, it will be one step closer to a black President. As long as they do their job well, I don't really care who is president or chief justice.
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Eli
Why should I care about this again?
they are responsible for interpreting the law and constitution.
You can thank them for the law of imminent domain....basically illegal seizure of your land has now been legalized.
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
listen... reinquist was a great man who served this country with honor and pride. whether ones agrees with hs opions or not.. does not detract from this fact.
we dont need political bu!!sh!t and cheap shots.
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
listen... reinquist was a great man who served this country with honor and pride. whether ones agrees with hs opions or not.. does not detract from this fact.
we dont need political bu!!sh!t and cheap shots.
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
listen... reinquist was a great man who served this country with honor and pride. whether ones agrees with hs opions or not.. does not detract from this fact.
we dont need political bu!!sh!t and cheap shots.
Originally posted by: RMSistight
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
listen... reinquist was a great man who served this country with honor and pride. whether ones agrees with hs opions or not.. does not detract from this fact.
we dont need political bu!!sh!t and cheap shots.
Agreed. But you have to realize that this is a HUGE opportunity for the Bush administration to nominate a chief justice to replace the great Reinquist.
Originally posted by: RMSistight
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
listen... reinquist was a great man who served this country with honor and pride. whether ones agrees with hs opions or not.. does not detract from this fact.
we dont need political bu!!sh!t and cheap shots.
Agreed. But you have to realize that this is a HUGE opportunity for the Bush administration to nominate a chief justice to replace the great Reinquist.
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: RMSistight
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
listen... reinquist was a great man who served this country with honor and pride. whether ones agrees with hs opions or not.. does not detract from this fact.
we dont need political bu!!sh!t and cheap shots.
Agreed. But you have to realize that this is a HUGE opportunity for the Bush administration to nominate a chief justice to replace the great Reinquist.
and HUGGEEEEE opportunity for the so-called leftists to bash Bush and the Bush administration
remember, the radical leftists are not liberals
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: RMSistight
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
listen... reinquist was a great man who served this country with honor and pride. whether ones agrees with hs opions or not.. does not detract from this fact.
we dont need political bu!!sh!t and cheap shots.
Agreed. But you have to realize that this is a HUGE opportunity for the Bush administration to nominate a chief justice to replace the great Reinquist.
and HUGGEEEEE opportunity for the so-called leftists to bash Bush and the Bush administration
remember, the radical leftists are not liberals
Nah, I will reserve this thread for remembering Rehnquist. Plenty of other opportunities to deal with other stuff. Why so defensive?
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: RMSistight
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
listen... reinquist was a great man who served this country with honor and pride. whether ones agrees with hs opions or not.. does not detract from this fact.
we dont need political bu!!sh!t and cheap shots.
Agreed. But you have to realize that this is a HUGE opportunity for the Bush administration to nominate a chief justice to replace the great Reinquist.
Again, SO WHAT???
Rehnquist was the most conservative judge on the court. A Bush replacement will be a wash. No gain for conseravtives, no loss for liberals.
The ignorance here is simply amazing.
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: RMSistight
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
listen... reinquist was a great man who served this country with honor and pride. whether ones agrees with hs opions or not.. does not detract from this fact.
we dont need political bu!!sh!t and cheap shots.
Agreed. But you have to realize that this is a HUGE opportunity for the Bush administration to nominate a chief justice to replace the great Reinquist.
Again, SO WHAT???
Rehnquist was the most conservative judge on the court. A Bush replacement will be a wash. No gain for conseravtives, no loss for liberals.
The ignorance here is simply amazing.
He's partly right. Rehnquist was going to have to stepdown soon as well due to health reasons. If he did this during a Republican administration, the repubs could get a younger guy to replace him for the next 20-25 years. Thomas is 12 years younger that's why I think Bush will tap him as the next Supreme Court Chief Justice. He's only 57 while Scalia is almost 70.
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: RMSistight
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
listen... reinquist was a great man who served this country with honor and pride. whether ones agrees with hs opions or not.. does not detract from this fact.
we dont need political bu!!sh!t and cheap shots.
Agreed. But you have to realize that this is a HUGE opportunity for the Bush administration to nominate a chief justice to replace the great Reinquist.
Again, SO WHAT???
Rehnquist was the most conservative judge on the court. A Bush replacement will be a wash. No gain for conseravtives, no loss for liberals.
The ignorance here is simply amazing.
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: RMSistight
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
listen... reinquist was a great man who served this country with honor and pride. whether ones agrees with hs opions or not.. does not detract from this fact.
we dont need political bu!!sh!t and cheap shots.
Agreed. But you have to realize that this is a HUGE opportunity for the Bush administration to nominate a chief justice to replace the great Reinquist.
Again, SO WHAT???
Rehnquist was the most conservative judge on the court. A Bush replacement will be a wash. No gain for conseravtives, no loss for liberals.
The ignorance here is simply amazing.
He's partly right. Rehnquist was going to have to stepdown soon as well due to health reasons. If he did this during a Republican administration, the repubs could get a younger guy to replace him for the next 20-25 years. Thomas is 12 years younger that's why I think Bush will tap him as the next Supreme Court Chief Justice. He's only 57 while Scalia is almost 70.
It doeswn't matter who the Chief Justice is. Chief Justice has no more pull than any other justice.
The true issue is a new appointment. And in this case, it's a wash.
Originally posted by: RMSistight
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: RMSistight
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
listen... reinquist was a great man who served this country with honor and pride. whether ones agrees with hs opions or not.. does not detract from this fact.
we dont need political bu!!sh!t and cheap shots.
Agreed. But you have to realize that this is a HUGE opportunity for the Bush administration to nominate a chief justice to replace the great Reinquist.
Again, SO WHAT???
Rehnquist was the most conservative judge on the court. A Bush replacement will be a wash. No gain for conseravtives, no loss for liberals.
The ignorance here is simply amazing.
I didn't say there was going to be a lost for conservatives. A Supreme Court Chief Justice nomination happens only once in a long time. It's going to be a greater headache to get a Chief Justice confirmed....let alone an associate justice like John Roberts.
Originally posted by: RKS
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: RMSistight
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
listen... reinquist was a great man who served this country with honor and pride. whether ones agrees with hs opions or not.. does not detract from this fact.
we dont need political bu!!sh!t and cheap shots.
Agreed. But you have to realize that this is a HUGE opportunity for the Bush administration to nominate a chief justice to replace the great Reinquist.
Again, SO WHAT???
Rehnquist was the most conservative judge on the court. A Bush replacement will be a wash. No gain for conseravtives, no loss for liberals.
The ignorance here is simply amazing.
He's partly right. Rehnquist was going to have to stepdown soon as well due to health reasons. If he did this during a Republican administration, the repubs could get a younger guy to replace him for the next 20-25 years. Thomas is 12 years younger that's why I think Bush will tap him as the next Supreme Court Chief Justice. He's only 57 while Scalia is almost 70.
It doeswn't matter who the Chief Justice is. Chief Justice has no more pull than any other justice.
The true issue is a new appointment. And in this case, it's a wash.
The CJ does make a slight difference. The CJ decides who writes the opinion. Sometimes the dicta in these opinions is used by advocates in lower courts.
RIP Rehnquist.![]()
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
listen... reinquist was a great man who served this country with honor and pride. whether ones agrees with hs opions or not.. does not detract from this fact.
we dont need political bu!!sh!t and cheap shots.
the opinions are more valuable than the vote.Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: RKS
The CJ does make a slight difference. The CJ decides who writes the opinion. Sometimes the dicta in these opinions is used by advocates in lower courts.
RIP Rehnquist.![]()
Again, no big deal. The vote is already decided, and the CJ has no influence over the vote. The big deal here is the new appointee, and in this case, it's a wash.