Regarding the P4 vs XP Heat issue:
I think we've reached a point where both processors run fairly warm. However, I feel the most important factor when it comes to heat/wattage is no longer pure wattage, but wattage/area of contact surface.
For example, the p4 1.7ghz maxes at 84W. Its surface area is roughly 217 sq mm. (not including IHS). This roughly makes it ~.38W/sq mm.
An XP 1.53ghz maxes at 66W. Its surface area is roughly 128 sq mm. This roughly makes ~.51W/sq mm.
So in terms of cooling, it is quite a bit harder to cool an XP chip. Add in that an XP chip has the new, improved PCB exhibits much less heat loss, AMD chips will still remain harder to cool. NOt hard, but harder than p4s. (note: XP1.4ghz and T-bird 1.4ghz both push roughly the same amount of heat through the heatsink. This would indicate that the T-bird loses quite a bit of heat through the PCB and other secondary heat pathways).
Mike
P.S. Erasmus-X, Comparing XP temps is kinda hard. THe new PCB really throws off socket-thermistors.