Just turned it on...I like Bernie but he sounds like a broken record. He isn't wrong, but he "answers" every question with the same spiel.
This purity test is some serious bullshit.
Yeah and it was always bullshit. Obama had a lot of corporate donors but didn't let it corrupt him. We've been over it many times. All the people that sent in money in 2008 sent the money to Romney in 2012 because they didn't get anything from Obama. It's sad that Democrats have to take money from rich people to compete but they all want to repeal CU and/or go straight public funding. This is a stupid fight.Indeed but it is an issue that’s frequently brought up on this very forum.
Just turned it on...I like Bernie but he sounds like a broken record. He isn't wrong, but he "answers" every question with the same spiel.
Just fuck off. You're more of a broken record than Bernie.FREE STUFF FREE STUFF.
"Sir, how will we pay for it?"
"THE RICH WILL PAY FOR IT! "
"But Sir, according to our thorough calculations, even if you taxed the rich at 100% you still wouldn't have enough"
".... So... We will tax the rich MORE!"
Just fuck off. You're more of a broken record than Bernie.
That is not what was said.....misdirect much??FREE STUFF FREE STUFF.
"Sir, how will we pay for it?"
"THE RICH WILL PAY FOR IT! "
"But Sir, according to our thorough calculations, even if you taxed the rich at 100% you still wouldn't have enough"
".... So... We will tax the rich MORE!"
when you increase youre IQ level then maybe you will be able to follow and understand the debate...Christ - this is a fucking joke. Debates are such a crock of shit.
"Who would you forgive or give a gift to on this panel"....
Wow. Just wow. Can we increase the minimum IQ level for panelists to ask questions?
when you increase youre IQ level then maybe you will be able to follow and understand the debate...
It is an ironic statement coming from you...hahahaaaaa oh the irony!!Quoted for irony.
FREE STUFF FREE STUFF.
"Sir, how will we pay for it?"
"THE RICH WILL PAY FOR IT! "
"But Sir, according to our thorough calculations, even if you taxed the rich at 100% you still wouldn't have enough"
".... So... We will tax the rich MORE!"
Your argument doesn't work. It's as retarded as your only 1% claim deductions argument!