UncleWai
Diamond Member
- Oct 23, 2001
- 5,701
- 68
- 91
Originally posted by: Ilmater
OK, but let me make two points - again, taking in consideration that I'm biased:Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
#2 Fvck Matt Hasselbeck. He was asked by Suzy what it was like to play with the likes of Holt, Smith, and Moss, and what's his answer? "Well, it was great to play with those guys, especially Steve and Santana. They're just incredible players," or something to that effect. Screw him. Holt is the best receiver of the three, and he's leaps and bounds above Moss who has decent hands and speed and that's it. His routes are only average, and he will never win a jump ball in his life.
Lol while i respect your bias, i would definitely say that it is vice versa.
#1 Holt is still the better receiver. He's been doing it for longer, and has a SB ring (and another appearance) to prove it.
#2 To single them out like they're a step above Holt is ridiculous. Even if I grant that they're good (and I'll give Smith all kinds of props for being an amazing receiver, but all Moss really does is run faster than everyone else), singling them out above Torry Holt is ridiculous.
Are you just bitter? Hasselbeck played against Moss and Smith in the playoff, so that's why he was complimenting their game. If the Rams get into the playoff instead of the Redskins, Hasselbeck would leave out Moss as well probably.
