Originally posted by: bromer
Thats just sweet.. Now we just need Matrox to do the same 🙂
Originally posted by: bromer
Well. . you can use their card, but not as good as you can in Linux as Matrox have made drivers to linux 🙂
I doubt there is a difference with the XFree86 drivers. They're all mga, right? The good thing about official drivers, is it takes more advantage of your hardware...Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: bromer
Well. . you can use their card, but not as good as you can in Linux as Matrox have made drivers to linux 🙂
I have never had problems with a Maxtrox card in FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Linux, or BeOS. What is the difference between mga and the Matrox provided drivers?
Originally posted by: TheOmegaCode
I doubt there is a difference with the XFree86 drivers. They're all mga, right? The good thing about official drivers, is it takes more advantage of your hardware...Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: bromer
Well. . you can use their card, but not as good as you can in Linux as Matrox have made drivers to linux 🙂
I have never had problems with a Maxtrox card in FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Linux, or BeOS. What is the difference between mga and the Matrox provided drivers?
The included display drivers are based on the Matrox driver source
included with XFree86. Modifications made by Matrox include the
addition of escape calls to support Matrox PowerDesk, and the
inclusion of the Matrox HAL library, which can be optionally
installed to enable Matrox specific features.