*OFFICIAL* Nominations for PWNAGE-of-the-year threads

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Fausto

Elite Member
Nov 29, 2000
26,521
2
0
Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: Fausto
Originally posted by: murphy55d
Originally posted by: acidvoodoo
what about threads with that "imtim" troll [or was it intim]

anyway he posted something like how he would never drink or have sex, and if a girl touched his ass he'd sue em. guy got flamed :p

not sure what thread it was though

You're thinking of imtim83... and while he was a tool, he never really got owned. he was just a tool who made some odd comments.
I think he falls into the category of "Auto-Ownage". Most of the stuff he posted was just so pathetic that making fun of him was almost redundant.

This made me laugh pretty hard. I don't think his testes have dropped yet.:p

I'm not conviced that he HAS testicles.
He may have chopped them off because they were making him want to touch himself in his naughty place. I really wouldn't put that past him.

The thread where he was bragging about having a 22" waist was a good one as well.

 

GoodToGo

Diamond Member
Jul 16, 2000
3,516
1
0
OBTW, does anybody remember that thread in which a sick dude was smelling his sister's panties and someone actually called his home up? It wasnt in this forums but it was ownage defined :D
 

Encryptic

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
8,885
0
0
Originally posted by: GoodToGo
OBTW, does anybody remember that thread in which a sick dude was smelling his sister's panties and someone actually called his home up? It wasnt in this forums but it was ownage defined :D

That was a post on Something Awful's forums, as I recall.
 

Wuffsunie

Platinum Member
May 4, 2002
2,808
0
0
Hmmm... let's see here

Defiantly not pwned by his own dog. I personally define ownage as being smacked down hard by ones peers here for doing utterly stupid sh!t. This was just bad luck and he doesn't come off as a complete tool at all during the thread, unlike the rest here.

Not the Lord Raiden Thread. He's just incredibly dumb, no hard core ownage going on. Certainly lots of shooting himself in the foot, though. Only minor flame feeding.

The ethicalangel thread is primarily flame bait. Nicely fed flame bait, too, but only at the beginning. Love the lawyer background, you really couldn't tell from anything else. Having the past dug up sucks. The english ees also net so good either. For me, making fun of ppl who can't communicate on the net is like making fun of retarded people IRL. All in all, too short.

CT2TXtech got pwned is a nice one :) Lying about RL in VR and getting caught (especially making contradictory threads so close together) always sucks large. Especially on the scale that happened here. The net never forgets ;) Well, all that and his english = teh suxor. Man never learned not to feed the flames either. Kind of admitted to being a lying dirt bag, but no retractions or apologies.

The Aimster thread has a high ownage value. Much feeding of the flames, I like that, though only at the beginning and towards the end in a "salvage" situation. The fact that the story changes with each post and includes utterly massive contradictions just make him look all the more a tool. The things from the past are great, especially the pizza stories. Alas, he doesn't try and defend the situation enough just deny it was him, thus not feeding the ownage as much as others.

So far Finding Nemo, WHSLacrossekid Thread is defiantly a good contender!! Nothing like owning yourself multiple times over while pissing off a good portion of the ATOT pop by coming off as a money grubbing little weenie. Enough flame feeding to remind me of Pompeii. Plus, unlike CT2TX, WHS never had the grapes to admit he was a lying sack of sh!t.

What takes the cake, though, is defiantly the brick thread. That one looked like a stable floor after a heard of cows was fed diuretics. The fact that he constantly tried to save face made it all the better. Yeah, this one gets the award for me thus far.

-- Jack

The audiophile population of ATOT will be here en masse to pimpslap the Stupid out of you. Please hold.
-- moonshinemadness, ATOT
 

atom

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 1999
4,722
1
0
What ever happened to that dude that wanted elf ears? LOL that was hilarious.
 

bsmithy

Senior member
Oct 24, 2003
458
0
0
anyone got a link to SnapIT's performance?

"I'LL RIP YOUR ARMS FROM YOUR SOCKETS!!!!!!!!!11111111111"
 

I am undecided at the moment.

I agree with Redly1: I think Dennilfloss owned AT, not that Dennilfloss got owned. LOL!

However, here's another "ownage": Grasshopper27.
It could have been more interesting though.
 

Lucky

Lifer
Nov 26, 2000
13,126
1
0
Originally posted by: luvly
"was that the one where he posted something about his wife...and then in a different thread 5 minutes later said that it was his gf. then when he was called out on it he just said it was his serious gf that he called his wife"

I wouldn't call that thread, by CT2TXtech, owned because I have seen another AT member, Lucky, refer to his long-time gf as his wife (long before CT2TXtech did). My first reaction was "What!" However, other members asked him what was up with that. His response was that he's been with her long enough, so he may as well call her his wife . . . and he did that in real life.

I haven't read some of the threads mentioned so far. I would be curious is any would get the "ownage" stamp of approval in my view.


I certainly don't remember that but i did date her for nearly 5 years. long enough to be me wife. thank god i'm not with her anymore. :Q Freaky thing is I'm now dating a girl with the same name, their pets have the same name, their best friends have the same name, and they are both pre-K teachers. :Q
 

CT2TXtech

Banned
Apr 28, 2003
1,671
0
0
CT2TXtech got pwned is a nice one Lying about RL in VR and getting caught (especially making contradictory threads so close together) always sucks large. Especially on the scale that happened here. The net never forgets Well, all that and his english = teh suxor. Man never learned not to feed the flames either. Kind of admitted to being a lying dirt bag, but no retractions or apologies.

kind of admitted. I did, I did admit to that. As far as my english. I always typed in broken english in forums, chatting, informal emails, whatever else. I guess many of you nerds always type in correct english all the time. Good for yall, Opps, good for you
 

Wuffsunie

Platinum Member
May 4, 2002
2,808
0
0
Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: NFS4
New nomination:http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=38&threadid=1202922
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not large enough and he hasn't demonstrated the utter stupidity that some other nominees here have. No baiting, no feeding the flames. Shouldn't be a nominee. The kid with the disgusting hygiene is a better nominee than that guy.


Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: CT2TXtech
kind of admitted. I did, I did admit to that. As far as my english. I always typed in broken english in forums, chatting, informal emails, whatever else. I guess many of you nerds always type in correct english all the time. Good for yall, Opps, good for you
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You admit to your mistake, good man. Hope for your sake it doesn't happen again.

As for your english and the fact that you always used broken online being a sign to me of low intelligence, well, that's all a factor of communication. Clear communication is a byproduct of good grammar and sentence structure. I also read a great deal and can scan quickly through properly written stuff as I'm so familiar with the structure of proper english. If I have to slow down, stop, or even go back to try and puzzle out just WTF you're saying, I'm not going to be too happy with you or consider you that bright. I could give you a whole lecture on the meaning of the phrase "The medium is the message" but considering that what you write and HOW you write it is literally all we have to judge you with here, you should make an effort to come off as best you can.

-- Jack

Edit: Um.... fvck, okay you got me with a misspelling. Fixed.

If you put a billion monkeys in front of a billion typewriters typing at random, they would reproduce the entire collected works of Usenet in about...five minutes
-- Annon
 

CT2TXtech

Banned
Apr 28, 2003
1,671
0
0
Originally posted by: Wuffsunie
Not large enough and he hasn't demonstrated the utter stupidity that some other nominees here have. No baiting, no feeding the flames. Shouldn't be a nominee. The kid with the disgusting hygiene is a better nominee than that guy.

Originally posted by: CT2TXtech
kind of admitted. I did, I did admit to that. As far as my english. I always typed in broken english in forums, chatting, informal emails, whatever else. I guess many of you nerds always type in correct english all the time. Good for yall, Opps, good for you
You admit to your mistake, good man. Hope for your sake it doesn't happen again.

As for your english and the fact that you always used broken online being a sign to me of low intelligence, well, that's all a factor of communication. Clear communication is a byproduct of good gramer and sentence structure. I also read a great deal and can scan quickly through properly written stuff as I'm so familiar with the structure of proper english. If I have to slow down, stop, or even go back to try and puzzle out just WTF you're saying, I'm not going to be too happy with you or consider you that bright. I could give you a whole lecture on the meaning of the phrase "The medium is the message" but considering that what you write and HOW you write it is literally all we have to judge you with here, you should make an effort to come off as best you can.

-- Jack

If you put a billion monkeys in front of a billion typewriters typing at random, they would reproduce the entire collected works of Usenet in about...five minutes
-- Annon


"Clear communication is a byproduct of good gramer and sentence structure"

Does this also include spelling?:p:beer::D

 

Mookow

Lifer
Apr 24, 2001
10,162
0
0
Originally posted by: CT2TXtech

"Clear communication is a byproduct of good gramer and sentence structure"

Does this also include spelling?:p:beer::D

Oh, he spelled the words all right... just not correctly. So, yes, it includes spelling.

;)