It was 4-2. Sedin's disallowed goal would have made it 4-3. The following goal would have made it 4-4 early in the 3rd.
I know you can't say that you can just add on another goal and say that the 4-4 goal would have happened, but you also can't say that the missed goal wouldn't have mattered because they lost by 2 using the same logic.
I didn't watch the game first hand so I'll admit I'm just mouth-breathing here : but the feeling I got from comments about the game was it could have turned the game around, but probably wouldn't have.
Yes it sucked it was disallowed and in retrospect it shouldn't have been per the NHL's comments/rulebook. But there were other things that were more costly in that game. Having gone 0/3 on the PK was probably far more costly and there's no fault on the war room for that.
Not to say the botch called was irrelevant/doesn't matter -you definitely got screwed on that one. But I wouldn't say a disallowed goal in a game you weren't doing particularly well in to begin with isn't quite on par with having one (if not your best) dman somehow score on your goalie from the goal line on a backhanded wraparound attempt in overtime in a game where you took 50 shots.
Of course Dominato3r could be referring to some other fluke goal, he hasn't said.
I don't want the canucks to win it all (I'd obviously like the sharks to do that), but I hope they are around for a bit so we can see more of these guys :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkXvwG8xKJI&feature=related
Yea I posted it earlier, but I still chuckle at what they do to Jack Johnson and Justin Williams (QQ).