NHLPA: Some GMs may work without cap
Associated Press
11/30/2004
The NHL is labelling Thursday's dinner meeting in New York with the league's general managers as an informal get-together with no particular agenda, but Ted Saskin hopes much more will come out of it.
The senior director of the NHL Players' Association believes some GMs could live without a salary cap and work with other types of salary-drag systems.
"The discussions I've had with a few general managers over the last couple of months make it very clear that they don't have much information about our proposals or what the league's proposals have been to date," Saskin said Tuesday from his Toronto office.
"Hopefully the NHL will use their meeting as an opportunity to not only bring their general managers up to date, but also get some input on what type of salary restraints could be considered other than just a salary cap."
Bill Daly, the NHL's executive vice-president and chief legal officer, says it's a stretch to suggest GMs have been left totally in the dark.
"I don't think that's fair," Daly said from New York. "We try to be in contact with club representatives on a frequent basis, that's both at the governors' level, the team president level and at the general manager level.
"But we also understand that there's a lot of silence out there in terms of what's been going on. People want to hear it from the league and we thought this would be a good opportunity."
While Daly stayed behind in New York, commissioner Gary Bettman was in Edmonton on Tuesday, reiterating the league's disdain towards a luxury tax.
It's believed the union will make another offer to the league before the season is officially cancelled, but when exactly isn't clear.
Asked whether the league would at least sit down and talk again with the union if presented with a luxury-tax proposal that had more teeth to it, Daly said that would be a possibility.
"If they give us a meaningful proposal, absolutely I would think that it would be incumbent on us to consider it and to see if it warrants a meaningful counter-proposal," Daly said.
"I mean, they know what the issues are league-wide and the issues facing our clubs. I would hope, at some point in this process, that they would craft a proposal that would deal with those issues."
The union has made two proposals over the last two years, the last being Sept. 9, based on a luxury tax, revenue sharing, changes to the entry-level system and a five per cent rollback in salaries.
The league wants "cost certainty," a system that would link player costs to overall league revenues, limiting the players to no more than 53 per cent of revenues. The union calls that a salary cap, a total non-starter.
As far as Thursday night's dinner meeting, to be held at an Italian restaurant in Manhattan, Daly said not to read too much into it.
"We're going to certainly provide them with an update with where we are in the negotiation process and answer any questions that they may have," Daly said. "The purpose of the meeting really isn't anything specific other than the fact that the group hasn't gotten together in a while."
Not all 30 GMs will be present, because attendance isn't mandatory but most will be on hand.
The NHLPA had a similar update with 62 player agents two weeks ago in Chicago but Daly says it's not exactly the same.
"I think it would be different in the sense that we don't have any formal agenda, we're not going in there to talk about specific things," Daly said. "There will be talk about how the new rules are working in the AHL, get the general managers' view on that, and obviously we'll be giving them an update on collective bargaining and answering their questions, but there really isn't no particular reason for this meeting other than just wanting to get the guys together from time to time."
Asked what a GM would be told if he asked whether the league was formulating a new proposal, Daly said: "What I would say is that we're playing this on a daily basis. We're certainly not planning, at this point, to make a proposal, and we understand that the Players' Association may or may not be preparing a proposal.
"Obviously if they make a proposal and it's a meaningful proposal we'll respond in a meaningful way. If they don't make us a proposal, we'll assess the situation as it goes on and do what we think is right and what we think will lead to a resolution in the bargaining process."
Time continues to work against both sides. Many believe the season will be cancelled if there's no deal by early to mid-January.
"As each day goes by, the level of urgency increases in terms of having enough time to negotiate a deal and get the players back on the ice to play hockey this season," Daly said. "Certainly as we've arrived at the last day of November, the urgency is at a higher level than it's been at any point in the past."
Cheers,
Aquaman