Not really, he's on record as saying running/option QB's are not a long-term viable option in today's NFL, I happen to agree..
That's likely because RG3 fans were unbearably annoying last year.so do I...but as much as I like ICF's commentary in these threads, he has a particular hard-on for RG3. it never ends.
so do I...but as much as I like ICF's commentary in these threads, he has a particular hard-on for RG3. it never ends.
That's likely because RG3 fans were unbearably annoying last year.
Pff, you gonna toot your own horn after each game that proves you right, and stay silent after each one that doesn't?
No, I believe this is the first time I've mentioned RG3 this year. Anyway, QBs have good games and have bad games. My contention has always been the following:
1. RG3 would initially have more success than Luck. Luck, however, would have the better career.
2. RG3 is a running QB and will be injury prone.
Aside from RG3, I've said the Shanahan is an idiot and got chastised for that. Anyone want to apologize now?![]()
No, I believe this is the first time I've mentioned RG3 this year. Anyway, QBs have good games and have bad games. My contention has always been the following:
1. RG3 would initially have more success than Luck. Luck, however, would have the better career.
2. RG3 is a running QB and will be injury prone.
Aside from RG3, I've said the Shanahan is an idiot and got chastised for that. Anyone want to apologize now?![]()
Wasn't talking about RG3![]()
Luck hasn't played spectacularly from a statistical perspective outside of the first game. What he does do, however, is come through when the game is on the line.
He's deceptively fast/mobile too. He's no Vick when it comes to scrambling for yards, but when he rolls out of the pocket with some momentum he can pick up 10 yards in a hurry. He had a couple plays yesterday that sustained drives with his legs.
Yeah, I don't think SanFran even knew he had the ball on the bootleg when he scored. Great looking play.
Funny thing is that that bootleg left QB keeper was a trademark Alex Smith play.
![]()
If anything, I'd prefer a player like Luck over RG3..., any day.
Careful now, if the Redskins beat the Raiders, you'll be branded a heretic for your blasphemy against RG0-3 (great one, Phoenix!).
OK, what about Kaepernick? I was one of the few people around here that hated, and still hate his taking over for Smith, essentially putting him in the same QB role of RG3.
Is he not now more exposed as a bit of a fraud?
As for RG3--I'm far more pissed at Shanahan than anything. Plus, he clearly same back too early--or needed some reps in pre season. Either way, his career is being poorly managed by the people that are responsible for taking care of him.
OK, what about Kaepernick? I was one of the few people around here that hated, and still hate his taking over for Smith, essentially putting him in the same QB role of RG3.
IndyColtsFan said:It isn't that I think Kaepernick is that good; on the contrary, I just don't think Smith is the answer for the Niners. I've not really given an opinion one way or another on Kaepernick vs. Smith, but I do think the anti-Kaepernick crowd screaming for heads when he has had one bad game is silly. Smith has had good QB ratings the last couple of years, but he can't stretch the field and is entirely too predictable and limited IMO. That is why Harbaugh benched him.
On another note, I won't speak for AMDZen regarding Kaepernick but I will give my own opinion. I think Kaepernick is too gimmicky and will be another in the long line of flashy running/hybrid QBs that NFL defenses adapt to and consistently stuff unless he becomes a pocket passer. And if you do want to point out some real hypocrisy, you RG3 fans can't call Cunningham and Vick "running QBs" and say RG3 isn't one when RG3's rushing attempts are right in the neighborhood of the career highs for Cunningham and Vick.