Originally posted by: Lager
Did anyone notice how Webber started to step up in Game 6 after Sac had the game in the bag? HAHAHAHA. He won't shoot during crunch time, yet he shoots when he knows he can screw up and not get heat for it.
Originally posted by: Lager
Anybody else miss Bill Walton?
Walton > Rivers > Michaels
"Throw it down big man, throw it DOWN!"
Originally posted by: hdeck
Originally posted by: Lager
Anybody else miss Bill Walton?
Walton > Rivers > Michaels
"Throw it down big man, throw it DOWN!"
you did not just say that...bill walton is horrible...
Originally posted by: hdeck
Originally posted by: Lager
Anybody else miss Bill Walton?
Walton > Rivers > Michaels
"Throw it down big man, throw it DOWN!"
you did not just say that...bill walton is horrible...
Originally posted by: BamBam215
Originally posted by: hdeck
Originally posted by: Lager
Anybody else miss Bill Walton?
Walton > Rivers > Michaels
"Throw it down big man, throw it DOWN!"
you did not just say that...bill walton is horrible...
bill walton is better than doc rivers. that guy is truly horrible. i feel like he dumbs down the game so much that i feel insulted listening to him.
Originally posted by: hdeck
Originally posted by: BamBam215
Originally posted by: hdeck
Originally posted by: Lager
Anybody else miss Bill Walton?
Walton > Rivers > Michaels
"Throw it down big man, throw it DOWN!"
you did not just say that...bill walton is horrible...
bill walton is better than doc rivers. that guy is truly horrible. i feel like he dumbs down the game so much that i feel insulted listening to him.
i put the tv on mute when bill walton is on. he's as bad a commentator on basketball as madden is on football. it just hurts listening to him.
Originally posted by: hdeck
Originally posted by: BamBam215
Originally posted by: hdeck
Originally posted by: Lager
Anybody else miss Bill Walton?
Walton > Rivers > Michaels
"Throw it down big man, throw it DOWN!"
you did not just say that...bill walton is horrible...
bill walton is better than doc rivers. that guy is truly horrible. i feel like he dumbs down the game so much that i feel insulted listening to him.
i put the tv on mute when bill walton is on. he's as bad a commentator on basketball as madden is on football. it just hurts listening to him.
Neither Hudson nor Wally have been a factor this year. That's irrelevent. And unless I missed something (which I could have) Wally is back.
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Neither Hudson nor Wally have been a factor this year. That's irrelevent. And unless I missed something (which I could have) Wally is back.
Yeah, sorry, Wally is back. But no, Hudson is a huge factor. Consider:
1) Cassell is injured and has to play longer minutes with Hudson out. Obviously not good.
2) Hudson is a Bobby Jackson type of spark off the bench and an incredible spot up and screen/roll shooter. Takes lots of pressure off KG, in other words. Why do you think they won 50 games with Hudson as a 2nd option last year? No, it wasn't just cause of KG.
3) Darrick freaking Martin is the Twolves' backup PG. He does absolutely nothing for the Twolves, so little that KG has had to be a PG when Cassell fouled out in Game 3. Think that would have happened with Hudson? No, not a chance in hell.
Originally posted by: SuepaFly
Originally posted by: Lager
Originally posted by: dafatha00
So sure the Wolves are gonna beat the Kings eh?
Packed Target Center + pissed off KG + pissed off Sam Cassell + Wally's shooting touch = W
Go Kings.
Originally posted by: CubicZirconia
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Neither Hudson nor Wally have been a factor this year. That's irrelevent. And unless I missed something (which I could have) Wally is back.
Yeah, sorry, Wally is back. But no, Hudson is a huge factor. Consider:
1) Cassell is injured and has to play longer minutes with Hudson out. Obviously not good.
2) Hudson is a Bobby Jackson type of spark off the bench and an incredible spot up and screen/roll shooter. Takes lots of pressure off KG, in other words. Why do you think they won 50 games with Hudson as a 2nd option last year? No, it wasn't just cause of KG.
3) Darrick freaking Martin is the Twolves' backup PG. He does absolutely nothing for the Twolves, so little that KG has had to be a PG when Cassell fouled out in Game 3. Think that would have happened with Hudson? No, not a chance in hell.
Hudson has only played 29 games this year, and the Wolves still managed to take the #1 seed. Yes, he's a great player and he'd be nice to have, but he has not been a factor this year. And Wally has only played 28. Thus, your points 2 and 3, while true, are basically irrelevent.
Yes, Darrick Martin sucks, but he's sucked all year and the wolves have gotten by. We'll see what happens with Cassell. The point is that just because the wolves don't have Hudson or Wally at full strength doesn't mean they can't beat the Lakers. A) they beat the lakers 3 times this year (and yes I know the playoffs are different and the lakers are playing well now, but who's to say the wolves won't start playing really well too and B) If the great and wonderful Kings are the only team with a legitimate chance to beat the lakers, they should have blown the twolves out of the house. And that, of course, hasn't happened.
And one last interesting fact, the Kings and the Wolves were the only teams to win their respective series with the Lakers this year.
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Originally posted by: CubicZirconia
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Neither Hudson nor Wally have been a factor this year. That's irrelevent. And unless I missed something (which I could have) Wally is back.
Yeah, sorry, Wally is back. But no, Hudson is a huge factor. Consider:
1) Cassell is injured and has to play longer minutes with Hudson out. Obviously not good.
2) Hudson is a Bobby Jackson type of spark off the bench and an incredible spot up and screen/roll shooter. Takes lots of pressure off KG, in other words. Why do you think they won 50 games with Hudson as a 2nd option last year? No, it wasn't just cause of KG.
3) Darrick freaking Martin is the Twolves' backup PG. He does absolutely nothing for the Twolves, so little that KG has had to be a PG when Cassell fouled out in Game 3. Think that would have happened with Hudson? No, not a chance in hell.
Hudson has only played 29 games this year, and the Wolves still managed to take the #1 seed. Yes, he's a great player and he'd be nice to have, but he has not been a factor this year. And Wally has only played 28. Thus, your points 2 and 3, while true, are basically irrelevent.
Yes, Darrick Martin sucks, but he's sucked all year and the wolves have gotten by. We'll see what happens with Cassell. The point is that just because the wolves don't have Hudson or Wally at full strength doesn't mean they can't beat the Lakers. A) they beat the lakers 3 times this year (and yes I know the playoffs are different and the lakers are playing well now, but who's to say the wolves won't start playing really well too and B) If the great and wonderful Kings are the only team with a legitimate chance to beat the lakers, they should have blown the twolves out of the house. And that, of course, hasn't happened.
And one last interesting fact, the Kings and the Wolves were the only teams to win their respective series with the Lakers this year.
The fact that the Twolves finished with the 1st seed is irrelevant (especially when the top 4 seeds were separated by like 2 games). Hudson and Wally provide deadly outside shooters when teams collapse on KG. The Twolves got by in the regular season without them for most of it, but regular season play isn't really even close to playoff intensity the majority of the time, so that is also irrelevant, as is Minny's 3-1 record against the Lakers with players such as Shaq, Karl and Kobe missing games against Minny during the regular season. All are healthy and playing right now.
Additionally, I mention Hudson as a huge missing piece because the Lakers defense this postseason has been predicated on collapsing the middle and forcing jump shooters to beat you. Hudson would literally take apart the Lakers unless they play stellar rotation D for the full 48 every game, which is highly highly unlikely given the inconsistent nature of this Lakers squad. True, Phil Jackson may tweak the defensive approach against good jump shooting teams like Minny and the Kings, but I'm sure the same basic collapse the middle approach will hold true.
We'll see how much jump shooting kills Minny or the Kings against the Lakers.
Originally posted by: CubicZirconia
Just for the record, CA has too many teams. The last thing the NBA needs is two teams from California vying for the NBA I mean western conference championship.
Originally posted by: Reliant
Originally posted by: CubicZirconia
Just for the record, CA has too many teams. The last thing the NBA needs is two teams from California vying for the NBA I mean western conference championship.
And yet Kings vs Lakers get the best ratings of any NBA games and is the series everyone wants to see.