I am disappoint.Pretty crappy in x-fire with 2 6990's too.
Those AMD slides lie!
![]()
![]()
I am disappoint.Pretty crappy in x-fire with 2 6990's too.
Those AMD slides lie!
![]()
![]()
Pretty crappy in x-fire with 2 6990's too.
Those AMD slides lie!![]()
Unless Drivers can change things, looks to me like AMD should have just decided to skip this Generation of Dual GPU cards.
but with the 6990 getting closer to the limits that doesn't leave much headroom for the 590. The performance difference is going to come down to driver support on a per game basis. Bank on it!
And lose out in all the money?why?
![]()
Groove has a thread about it.
Pretty much this, this time no one can even bring up the power consumption or noiseIt will come down to who has the best cooler and sli/x-fire drivers.
Actually looking at Far Cry it looks like there is a bottleneck somewhere... Crysis is disappoint me though
Something has to be all those numbers come and stop at the same spot.They used a intel 990 cpu @ 4 ghz! bottleneck? naaa.
I read that review, it totally sucked,thats why I didn't add it to the OP.:thumbsdown:
I don't think they'll sell many, not that they would even if it was Fastest, but Sales are likely to be further suppressed given these results.
Pretty much this, this time no one can even bring up the power consumption or noise.
Your job is to post reviews not decide which are good or bad
Not when the review is so bad that 6970 crossfire is losing to a underclocked 6990 in some noname site. Thats misinformation and wrong.:thumbsdown:
No I disagree. The gtx590 can use all the power it wants. The ANand review had the 6990 using 500 watts.
It will come down to who has the best cooler and sli/x-fire drivers.
As far as I can tell, the only limit seems to be how well you can cool your card, nVidia definitely has a tougher mountain to climb in that respect but I don't think it's impossible.The 6990 already looks like the most power hungry dual GPU card released. Nvidia is going to have to turn around and make the 590 the most power hungry card released to best the 6990's performance. That is my main point.
Also my other point still stands. Since the 6990 uses more power than previous dual-GPU cards, there is less headroom available. They simply can't just use all the power they want. There is a limit in there somewhere. These niche cards are becoming even more niche.
Im sorry, you werent there to test it and dont know what happened or what the results were, it is a review just post it up. There is nothing saying that it wasnt falsified or anything BUT you dont know that and cant pass judgment on it.
There is a limit in there somewhere.
As far as I can tell, the only limit seems to be how well you can cool your card, nVidia definitely has a tougher mountain to climb in that respect but I don't think it's impossible.
I think it may end up a wash this round though.
No there is not, not according to the pci-e spec people. Its in the Anand review.
I'm sure the gtx590 will draw over 500 watts when overclocked.
I guess we will wait and see.
Definitely but these cards are ulta-highend cards so nVidia can go with a variety of different exotic coolers to attain it's goal, the first one that comes to my mind is a triple slot cooler.Cooling is important. But there is a limit - a physical/electrical limit. Since the 6990 is using more of that limit than any previous card, there is less headroom available. That is fact. It can be debated just how much headroom there actually is, but the fact there is less is not refutable.
These cards' performance is simply going to be limited on just how the manufacturer's limit the power consumption. Power and performance are directly related here, and Nvidia does have its work cut out since per-GPU GF110 seem to use more power than Cayman.
Yes, there is. Now if you stop quoting a single sentence out of my post you would understand the point I was making. That sentence works in context with everything else I said. So I advise you read it.
