Official GTX 590 Review Thread (23 reviews at this time)

Page 20 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ocre

Golden Member
Dec 26, 2008
1,594
7
81
Because I'm interested in new hardware and wasn't aware this thread was only open to people actually buying a 590. o_O

you said it was irrelevant? now your interest is with it. did you mean irrelevant meaning something other than the word defies? am i missing something? irrelevant only in a purchasing context? maybe.....

sorry confused
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,545
11,688
136
you said it was irrelevant? now your interest is with it. did you mean irrelevant meaning something other than the word defies? am i missing something? irrelevant only in a purchasing context? maybe.....

sorry confused

I'd say its irrelevant given the other cards available.

Are you suggesting only people who have positive comments about the 590 are allowed to post?
 

ocre

Golden Member
Dec 26, 2008
1,594
7
81
Ok. Then i will list the advantages of gtx590, compared to 6990, because you asked for our opinion:

-Massive 11% performance advantage (in 1024x768)
-Tangible performance advantage in 3-4 years old games (as oposed to new and future)
-Quieter (as the difference between loud and very loud)
-Most of them dont blow up!

those are all good points. The pros dont have to be necessarily over the 6990, i am not trying to do that. Pros in general, the 6990 isnt the focus, its about the 590. this is the thread for the 590. So i am not asking for pros over the 6990. Just positives in general
 

ocre

Golden Member
Dec 26, 2008
1,594
7
81
I'd say its irrelevant given the other cards available.

Are you suggesting only people who have positive comments about the 590 are allowed to post?

uhmmm????? did some one say i said that? i claimed no such thing, but i am more interested in where you got that from. go back a few pages if must, i said many things but nothing to this nature.

did u really think i suggested that? for real? when?
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,545
11,688
136
uhmmm????? did some one say i said that? i claimed no such thing, but i am more interested in where you got that from. go back a few pages if must, i said many things but nothing to this nature.

did u really think i suggested that? for real? when?



you would get the 6990, thats cool. hey, i dont get it??? if the 590 is irrelevant to you why are you still in this thread posting???

Just thought i would ask!!


I didnt need to go back far.

Edit: Also if your not happy with my posting PM me rather than doing it in the thread thanks.
 
Last edited:

ocre

Golden Member
Dec 26, 2008
1,594
7
81
I didnt need to go back far.

Edit: Also if your not happy with my posting PM me rather than doing it in the thread thanks.



But it doesnt even make since??? i am sorry if u mistook my statements. My point was the 590 couldnt be irrelevant to you cause you where here posting in a thread about it. I didnt mean you couldnt post, nothing like that. Its not irrelevant or then you wouldnt even be here reading on it. anyway it was sorta a joke, poke fun, you know?

I am having a hard time communicating yo you, i am not meaning any ill. I can tell we arent on the same page at all. my bad, we arent gettn each others post i think. Sorry
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,545
11,688
136
But it doesnt even make since??? i am sorry if u mistook my statements. My point was the 590 couldnt be irrelevant to you cause you where here posting in a thread about it. I didnt mean you couldnt post, nothing like that. Its not irrelevant or then you wouldnt even be here reading on it. anyway it was sorta a joke, poke fun, you know?

I am having a hard time communicating yo you, i am not meaning any ill. I can tell we arent on the same page at all. my bad, we arent gettn each others post i think. Sorry


Welshbloke said:
Edit: Also if your not happy with my posting PM me rather than doing it in the thread thanks.

My posts and your opinion of them are way off topic for this thread.
 

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,147
1,330
126
I just thought of a positive thing to say about 590!!!

With a little voltage mod its the biggest bang for the buck you can get your hands on!

2v9qiie.jpg
 

happy medium

Lifer
Jun 8, 2003
14,387
480
126
Every one always wants the biggest bang for their buck...

And that 590 is the biggest bang for the buck is true on so many levels. We have already established that GPUs on 590 are superior to those on 6990, now if we could only find a way to feed em...

By the way Amazon has 590 with 23MHz OC on sale for $850
http://www.amazon.com/EVGA-GeForce-C...ata/B004TRLIII

Just buy direct from EVGA, they have plenty of models and they have the Classified factory overclocked model for 729$

http://www.evga.com/products/prodlist.asp
 
Last edited:

ocre

Golden Member
Dec 26, 2008
1,594
7
81
Every one always wants the biggest bang for their buck...

And that 590 is the biggest bang for the buck is true on so many levels. We have already established that GPUs on 590 are superior to those on 6990, now if we could only find a way to feed em...

By the way Amazon has 590 with 23MHz OC on sale for $850
http://www.amazon.com/EVGA-GeForce-C...ata/B004TRLIII

we just talked about them blowing up like just a few post ago.

why do you think nvidias gpus on the 590 are superior to those on the 6990? i dont see how they could be.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,545
11,688
136
we just talked about them blowing up like just a few post ago.

why do you think nvidias gpus on the 590 are superior to those on the 6990? i dont see how they could be.


Because the GTX580 is better than the HD6970.
 

pcm81

Senior member
Mar 11, 2011
598
16
81
we just talked about them blowing up like just a few post ago.

why do you think nvidias gpus on the 590 are superior to those on the 6990? i dont see how they could be.

The reason why GF110 is superior to the 6970 (6990 and 590 are just dual GPU versions) because GF110 wins at lower resolutions. Which means Gf110 does each operation faster than the GPU on 6970. However at larger Datasets 580 looses due to fixed loop overhead.

re-read my post on page 17 of this thread:
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2152626&page=17

near the bottom from 11:16 pm.
 

ocre

Golden Member
Dec 26, 2008
1,594
7
81
Because the GTX580 is better than the HD6970.

naw, thats not a good way to think. The 590 GPUs arent the same as 580s. They are underclocked and perform more like the 6970 than the 580. they are pretty even i think.
 
Last edited:

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,545
11,688
136
naw, thats not a good way to think. The 590 GPUs arent the same as 580s. They are underclocked and perform more like the 6970 than the 580. they are pretty even i think.

The GPUs on the 590 are identical (AFAIK) to the ones on the 580, differing clock speeds doesn't make them different GPU's.
 

pcm81

Senior member
Mar 11, 2011
598
16
81
naw, thats not a good way to think. The 590 GPUs arent the same as 580s. They are underclocked and perform more like the 6970 than the 580. they are pretty even i think.

They are the same GPUs. The fact that they are under clocked means they are crippled... If you buy an intel I7 980X and clock it at 1GHz, lower the voltages and run it without a fan, do you still have 980X?
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,545
11,688
136
They are the same GPUs. The fact that they are under clocked means they are crippled... If you buy an intel I7 980X and clock it at 1GHz, lower the voltages and run it without a fan, do you still have 980X?

[obligatorycarallegory]

If you put a limiter on a Porche 911 does it become a VW Beetle?

[/obligatorycarallegory]
 

ocre

Golden Member
Dec 26, 2008
1,594
7
81
The GPUs on the 590 are identical (AFAIK) to the ones on the 580, differing clock speeds doesn't make them different GPU's.

okay but you missed the point where we were talking about performance and the gpus on the 590 arent like the 580 in the fact that they are not clocked the same and this causes them to perform more like the 6970 than the 580. Thie 590 and the 580 are different GPUs. They arent the same. They uses less power and are at lower clocks. result: they perform not like the 580
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,545
11,688
136
okay but you missed the point where we were talking about performance and the gpus on the 590 arent like the 580 in the fact that they are not clocked the same and this causes them to perform more like the 6970 than the 580. Thie 590 and the 580 are different GPUs. They arent the same. They uses less power and are at lower clocks. result: they perform not like the 580


:confused:o_O They are still the same GPUs.

Does the GPU on my 6950 change into a different one when its at 2d clocks?