• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

*** Official Gigabyte 8KNXP/Ultra (875P) Thread ***

i just got my 8IK1100 today (its the "lite" version of the 8KNXP)...so far so good...
only problem that i have is the memory dividers...with a 400mhz FSB P4, i only have 2 options...one is 3:4 ratio and the other is auto. i cant seem to find the ratio so i can run my ram synchronus with the FSB (ie. 1:1 ratio)...
if anyone has any ideas im all ears...
btw...ive already updated the BIOS to the F5 bios...still only have those 2 options
 
Originally posted by: pr497
i just got my 8IK1100 today (its the "lite" version of the 8KNXP)...so far so good...
only problem that i have is the memory dividers...with a 400mhz FSB P4, i only have 2 options...one is 3:4 ratio and the other is auto. i cant seem to find the ratio so i can run my ram synchronus with the FSB (ie. 1:1 ratio)...
if anyone has any ideas im all ears...
btw...ive already updated the BIOS to the F5 bios...still only have those 2 options
Click to expand...

If you mean you want to run your RAM at 400MHz(PC3200), you can't. It's a chipset limitation.
 
TenEgg said:
well, what ratio do you get when it's auto?
Click to expand...
according to the BIOS...the divider is set to 3:4 when i choose auto...the BIOS tells you what your memory speed will be when you select a divider (in other words, the BIOS does the math for you)...so no matter what FSB im at, its gonna have a 3:4 ratio applied to it.
according to the manual, im supposed to have 3 options with a 400FSB P4:
1:1, 3:4 and auto.
i only have the 1st and last option in my case. ive already emailed gigabyte tech support about this so hopefully ill get a reply back from them soon...

jaeger66 said:
If you mean you want to run your RAM at 400MHz(PC3200), you can't. It's a chipset limitation.
Click to expand...
i think you understood the question incorrectly...the P4 bus is quad pumped...which means you multiply 4 by the FSB. when i said synchronus, i meant the value of the FSB before it is quad pumped. so...100FSB (which is actaully 400mhz quad pumped) with 1:1 ratio is ddr200 (cuz for the memory...its 100mhz x 2 since its ddr).
btw...this chipset does support ddr400 operation so you were actually wrong and right at the same time.
 
😱 I'm a little embarrassed about asking this, but I think I know the answer. I'm currently running a P2-400 machine. I have decided to upgrade to a new computer. I decided on the Gigabyte 8inxp motherboard. I got it and it was DOA. :frown: So I sent it back for a refund

So I was looking and realized the next chipset, the 875p, came out. So I figured since gigabyte was bring out this board in the next few weeks, that I would wait until it was on the market.

I was reading the message on the web site about how this new chip isn't much faster than the 845 chipset. So I'm looking at getting at least the 8knxp board for now and for future growth. I figure it will last me a very long time.

So I guess what I'm asking is since I'm making such a big upgrade, that I should just go with the 875p for long term growth.

Thanks for any replys.
 
Yep, however, the price is 250 for the 8knxp and 399 for the 8knxp-ultra.

So I'm going to wait a few days and perhaps weeks to see if it will come down.

See ya
 
Originally posted by: harddrive747
... the price is 250 for the 8knxp and 399 for the 8knxp-ultra...

So I'm going to wait a few days and perhaps weeks to see if it will come down...
Click to expand...

rolleye.gif
... 400 dollars for a mobo... i thought 245 was alot



Badash7... yes u can... i have never had my dps in... no reason really

 
the gigabyte site claims that it is 320 mbs of data transfer,but they say nothing about 64 bit controlling.
i hope it is not a 64 bit scsi controller soldered on a 32 bit pci controller.
if someone purchases this monster , i would love to see some atto results
this mobp is my next purchase if it is 64 bit
 
Originally posted by: Bobbyeyes
the gigabyte site claims that it is 320 mbs of data transfer,but they say nothing about 64 bit controlling.
i hope it is not a 64 bit scsi controller soldered on a 32 bit pci controller.
if someone purchases this monster , i would love to see some atto results
this mobp is my next purchase if it is 64 bit
Click to expand...

What's the difference? It's not like you're going to get much more than 75MB/s out of your drive anyway.
 
Originally posted by: Bobbyeyes
um... server boards have 64 bit pci slots to take full advantage of hard drives like mine:
Click to expand...

You're missing the point. The fastest hard drive on the planet, the Seagate Cheetah 15K.3, tops out at 76 MB/s. So unless you have 3 of them in RAID 5, you don't need a 64 bit bus or even an Ultra320 controller.
 
oh!...now i see.!!
a 32 bit bus, and a 64bit bus w/ a 320 controller will give the same data transfer(someone should tell TYAN and all the other server mobo manufacturures)

you know what.....
given the choice of a 32 bit/64 bit bus-w/ a 320 controller...
i think ill take the 64 bit bus.-especially w/ hyper threading!!
 
Originally posted by: Bobbyeyes
oh!...now i see.!!
a 32 bit bus, and a 64bit bus w/ a 320 controller will give the same data transfer(someone should tell TYAN and all the other server mobo manufacturures)

you know what.....
given the choice of a 32 bit/64 bit bus-w/ a 320 controller...
i think ill take the 64 bit bus.-especially w/ hyper threading!!
Click to expand...

You obviously don't get it. It doesn't MATTER how much data the controller can transfer because the drive will NEVER be able to reach those speeds. Put the Cheetah on an Adaptec 19160 and it won't be ANY slower than on a 64 bit/320 card. If you can't grasp this, you probably shouldn't use SCSI at all. And this isn't a server board.
 
Originally posted by: GetInMyFatBelly
But that $400 includes Ultra SCSI 320. How much would a motherboard + a Ultra SCSI 320 card cost you?
Click to expand...

w0w :Q... didnt know they were that pricey... $177 is the lowest pricewatch had for a Ultra SCSI 320 card...

alrighty then! research helps...
 
jaeger66...
that odd... it says that it is a server board on the web site.....
i better hurry up and sell all my scsi systems and hard drives!
thanks!
 
Originally posted by: Bobbyeyes
jaeger66...
that odd... it says that it is a server board on the web site.....
i better hurry up and sell all my scsi systems and hard drives!
thanks!
Click to expand...

That's probably a good idea, since you really don't have the faintest idea what you're talking about.
 
i REALLY dont have the faintest..
i even thought this thread was about the potentially fantastic
GIGABYTE GA-8KNXP board.

when i buy this board i will give a detailed (thugs format) thread.. including ide vs scsi performance, and overclocking and memory performance results.
so jaeger66...
i might just have to hold on to my scsi drives just a little longer!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top