bonkers325
Lifer
- Mar 9, 2000
- 13,076
- 1
- 0
Not going to get into it again. Most arguments against the theory are all predicated on arguing that competing is impossible without AH. It isn't. Which means that those arguments are useless.
Bottom line, and one that I have yet to see a conclusive argument defeating is that Diablo 3 is balanced based on the use of Auction house, and thus increasing the availability of (generally) more powerful and appropriate items. Therefore the inclusion of the AH altered the game play. Pure and simple.
Inclusion of the auction house leads to use of same. Blizzard takes a cut of the gold (and hence removes it from play) in AH transactions. Less money in game means more incentive to do RMHA. (Just because incentive, doesn't mean you HAVE to do it!). More people doing RMHA, the more money Blizzard makes. And they apparently are greasing the slope that direction.
players will be naturally inclined to follow the path of least resistance to gearing up. the auction houses are there, therefore people will use them. the fact that blizzard charges a fee indicates that blizzard knows this and wants to offer a 'safe' method of trade/sale while taking fee for each sale. without the GAH/RMAH, you would have tons of scamming and whatnot, blizzard just acts as middle-man for all trading.