Official Clinton suspicious deaths thread

[Perknose]

Originally posted by: Corbett
Why did you call my brain "anti-clinton fevered"?

Maybe because you posted in all seriousness:

I believe the drunk driving situation would be considered an "accident". Not murder.

This thread is about conspiracies of how the clintons have people killed.

They are 2 totally different situations.

And you did so in a thread the OP openly admitted was a PARODY thread, which marks you as both "anti-Clinton fevered" and a bit of a parody yourself.

 

[Corbett]

Originally posted by: Perknose

Originally posted by: Corbett
Why did you call my brain "anti-clinton fevered"?

Maybe because you posted in all seriousness:

I believe the drunk driving situation would be considered an "accident". Not murder.

This thread is about conspiracies of how the clintons have people killed.

They are 2 totally different situations.

And you did so in a thread the OP openly admitted was a PARODY thread, which marks you as both "anti-Clinton fevered" and a bit of a parody yourself.

This thread may have began as a sort of parody, but obviousl some here have taken it seriously. Again, your bias has lead you down the wrong path. I never once laid claim to any conspiracies in this thread. Nor did I promote them.

 

[techs]

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: UberNeuman

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: techs
I think its tragic that Laura Bush could kill someone while drunk driving and get away scott free.
I think THAT'S far more important than some loonie right wing nut tin foil hat conspiracy that Clinton killed some one.
After all, we know Laura Bush is a murderer. No one disputes it.

Sarcasm? If not, I dispute it.

I believe the drunk driving situation would be considered an "accident". Not murder.

This thread is about conspiracies of how the clintons have people killed.

They are 2 totally different situations.

Nice edit. Laura still killed her ex-boyfriend with her car...

Thats not murder. Nice spin though.

Encarta Dictionary:

the crime of killing another person deliberately and not in self-defense or with any other extenuating circumstance recognized by law

And since the police report was SUSPICIOUSLY written so the speed Laura Bush was going (ACCORDING TO SNOPES) was somehow written ILLEGIBLY.
So I believe Laura Bush was DRUNK and deliberately killed a boy she had a crush on for spurning her.

There is ACTUAL EVIDENCE FOR THIS (READ SNOPES).
SO LAURA BUSH ="S MURDERER.

 

[Corbett]

Originally posted by: techs

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: UberNeuman

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: techs
I think its tragic that Laura Bush could kill someone while drunk driving and get away scott free.
I think THAT'S far more important than some loonie right wing nut tin foil hat conspiracy that Clinton killed some one.
After all, we know Laura Bush is a murderer. No one disputes it.

Sarcasm? If not, I dispute it.

I believe the drunk driving situation would be considered an "accident". Not murder.

This thread is about conspiracies of how the clintons have people killed.

They are 2 totally different situations.

Nice edit. Laura still killed her ex-boyfriend with her car...

Thats not murder. Nice spin though.

Encarta Dictionary:

the crime of killing another person deliberately and not in self-defense or with any other extenuating circumstance recognized by law

And since the police report was SUSPICIOUSLY written so the speed Laura Bush was going (ACCORDING TO SNOPES) was somehow written ILLEGIBLY.
So I believe Laura Bush was DRUNK and deliberately killed a boy she had a crush on for spurning her.

There is ACTUAL EVIDENCE FOR THIS (READ SNOPES).
SO LAURA BUSH ="S MURDERER.

What you believe doesnt matter. Its what you can prove. But it just goes to show people like yourself will believe anything they read on the internet, if it fits into their mold of hate for anything they dont agree with (Bush)

 

[Perknose]

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: Perknose

Originally posted by: Corbett
Why did you call my brain "anti-clinton fevered"?

Maybe because you posted in all seriousness:

I believe the drunk driving situation would be considered an "accident". Not murder.

This thread is about conspiracies of how the clintons have people killed.

They are 2 totally different situations.

And you did so in a thread the OP openly admitted was a PARODY thread, which marks you as both "anti-Clinton fevered" and a bit of a parody yourself.

This thread may have began as a sort of parody, but obviousl some here have taken it seriously. Again, your bias has lead you down the wrong path. I never once laid claim to any conspiracies in this thread. Nor did I promote them.

You taking this seriously shows YOUR bias, and is LAME beyond belief.

 

[techs]

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: techs

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: UberNeuman

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: techs
I think its tragic that Laura Bush could kill someone while drunk driving and get away scott free.
I think THAT'S far more important than some loonie right wing nut tin foil hat conspiracy that Clinton killed some one.
After all, we know Laura Bush is a murderer. No one disputes it.

Sarcasm? If not, I dispute it.

I believe the drunk driving situation would be considered an "accident". Not murder.

This thread is about conspiracies of how the clintons have people killed.

They are 2 totally different situations.

Nice edit. Laura still killed her ex-boyfriend with her car...

Thats not murder. Nice spin though.

Encarta Dictionary:

the crime of killing another person deliberately and not in self-defense or with any other extenuating circumstance recognized by law

And since the police report was SUSPICIOUSLY written so the speed Laura Bush was going (ACCORDING TO SNOPES) was somehow written ILLEGIBLY.
So I believe Laura Bush was DRUNK and deliberately killed a boy she had a crush on for spurning her.

There is ACTUAL EVIDENCE FOR THIS (READ SNOPES).
SO LAURA BUSH ="S MURDERER.

What you believe doesnt matter. Its what you can prove. But it just goes to show people like yourself will believe anything they read on the internet, if it fits into their mold of hate for anything they dont agree with (Bush)

Hey, did you actually read this thread? Its about someone making a topic based on no information (except some people died, and the thread maker hates the Clintons) and claims there is evidence the Clintons killed them.

What I have done is shown ACTUAL EVIDENCE, AND INDISPUTABLE FACT THAT LAURA BUSH KILLED SOMEONE. I havea far better evidence that Laura Bush is a murderer than the Clintons are, hence the sarcasm of saying Laura Bush is a murderer.

 

[Corbett]

Originally posted by: Perknose

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: Perknose

Originally posted by: Corbett
Why did you call my brain "anti-clinton fevered"?

Maybe because you posted in all seriousness:

I believe the drunk driving situation would be considered an "accident". Not murder.

This thread is about conspiracies of how the clintons have people killed.

They are 2 totally different situations.

And you did so in a thread the OP openly admitted was a PARODY thread, which marks you as both "anti-Clinton fevered" and a bit of a parody yourself.

This thread may have began as a sort of parody, but obviousl some here have taken it seriously. Again, your bias has lead you down the wrong path. I never once laid claim to any conspiracies in this thread. Nor did I promote them.

You taking this seriously shows YOUR bias, and is LAME beyond belief.

Who said I take this seriously?

 

[UberNeuman]

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: Perknose

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: Perknose

Originally posted by: Corbett
Why did you call my brain "anti-clinton fevered"?

Maybe because you posted in all seriousness:

I believe the drunk driving situation would be considered an "accident". Not murder.

This thread is about conspiracies of how the clintons have people killed.

They are 2 totally different situations.

And you did so in a thread the OP openly admitted was a PARODY thread, which marks you as both "anti-Clinton fevered" and a bit of a parody yourself.

This thread may have began as a sort of parody, but obviousl some here have taken it seriously. Again, your bias has lead you down the wrong path. I never once laid claim to any conspiracies in this thread. Nor did I promote them.

You taking this seriously shows YOUR bias, and is LAME beyond belief.

Who said I take this seriously?

You must as you called me out in this thread: this thread here, yep.......