Originally posted by: jjsole
I signed up and hope to start doing things this month or next. Its never to late to win, right? 😛 If I'm slow getting started please don't delete me. 🙂
Originally posted by: Lothar
Looks like the purchasing of penny stocks has claimed a victim.
Originally posted by: Azurik
Originally posted by: Lothar
Looks like the purchasing of penny stocks has claimed a victim.
Who is it? I don't see anyone with more than a 30% loss.
It's a moot point anyway, I'm going to win this game with a 300% gain for the year.
Sorry to break all your hearts :brokenheart:
😉
Originally posted by: bonkers325
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: bonkers325
i triumphantly claim last place
Never invest all your money in one particular stock (Unless it's Berkshire of course). 😉
i should've put a stop in place. the morning that particular stock took a huge jump, i was in a meeting and didn't find out i was dead last until it was too late 😛
Originally posted by: Azurik
Originally posted by: Lothar
Looks like the purchasing of penny stocks has claimed a victim.
Who is it? I don't see anyone with more than a 30% loss.
It's a moot point anyway, I'm going to win this game with a 300% gain for the year.
Sorry to break all your hearts :brokenheart:
😉
Originally posted by: hypn0tik
I can't break the $100k barrier for the life of me. Bah. Guess I need to play around more.
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: bonkers325
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: bonkers325
i triumphantly claim last place
Never invest all your money in one particular stock (Unless it's Berkshire of course). 😉
i should've put a stop in place. the morning that particular stock took a huge jump, i was in a meeting and didn't find out i was dead last until it was too late 😛
What in the world?
How the hell did you catch up?
OMG...Hax!!!
Originally posted by: Lothar
As long as I do better than the S&P 500, I don't care so much about rankings.
So far since I started Jan 17th(my 1st purchase)
ATOT VSE portfolio: +10.42%
S&P 500: +0.43%
Originally posted by: Special K
Originally posted by: Lothar
As long as I do better than the S&P 500, I don't care so much about rankings.
So far since I started Jan 17th(my 1st purchase)
ATOT VSE portfolio: +10.42%
S&P 500: +0.43%
Doesn't risk matter here though? I've seen emerging markets funds brag about how well they did relative to the S&P500, when in fact the EM fund had a much higher beta. Wouldn't risk-adjusted returns be a better measure?
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: Special K
Originally posted by: Lothar
As long as I do better than the S&P 500, I don't care so much about rankings.
So far since I started Jan 17th(my 1st purchase)
ATOT VSE portfolio: +10.42%
S&P 500: +0.43%
Doesn't risk matter here though? I've seen emerging markets funds brag about how well they did relative to the S&P500, when in fact the EM fund had a much higher beta. Wouldn't risk-adjusted returns be a better measure?
Every stock my portfolio has a lower beta than the S&P500 index, therefore my portfolio overall carries a lot less risk.
My portfolio was only down -1.02% today.
Compare that with the -2.20% and -2.30% drop in the S&P500 and Nasdaq.
There's no EM funds there.
All money made so far has been on longs.
I could go the easy route and short Citi, Capital One, Washington Mutual, Ambac/MBIA, but I don't believe in short selling stocks that much.
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: Special K
Originally posted by: Lothar
As long as I do better than the S&P 500, I don't care so much about rankings.
So far since I started Jan 17th(my 1st purchase)
ATOT VSE portfolio: +10.42%
S&P 500: +0.43%
Doesn't risk matter here though? I've seen emerging markets funds brag about how well they did relative to the S&P500, when in fact the EM fund had a much higher beta. Wouldn't risk-adjusted returns be a better measure?
Every stock my portfolio has a lower beta than the S&P500 index, therefore my portfolio overall carries a lot less risk.
My portfolio was only down -1.02% today.
Compare that with the -2.20% and -2.30% drop in the S&P500 and Nasdaq.
There's no EM funds there.
All money made so far has been on longs.
I could go the easy route and short Citi, Capital One, Washington Mutual, Ambac/MBIA, but I don't believe in short selling stocks that much.
Originally posted by: Special K
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: Special K
Originally posted by: Lothar
As long as I do better than the S&P 500, I don't care so much about rankings.
So far since I started Jan 17th(my 1st purchase)
ATOT VSE portfolio: +10.42%
S&P 500: +0.43%
Doesn't risk matter here though? I've seen emerging markets funds brag about how well they did relative to the S&P500, when in fact the EM fund had a much higher beta. Wouldn't risk-adjusted returns be a better measure?
Every stock my portfolio has a lower beta than the S&P500 index, therefore my portfolio overall carries a lot less risk.
My portfolio was only down -1.02% today.
Compare that with the -2.20% and -2.30% drop in the S&P500 and Nasdaq.
There's no EM funds there.
All money made so far has been on longs.
I could go the easy route and short Citi, Capital One, Washington Mutual, Ambac/MBIA, but I don't believe in short selling stocks that much.
If it's that easy to beat the S&P500 on a risk-adjusted basis, then why invest in mutual funds at all? Heck, if you can do that, why not be a fund manager, since 80% of them cannot beat their benchmark index in the long term after expenses are subtracted?
My question is somewhat rhetorical, but as a novice investor who stumbled onto the diehards forum, I often question their strategy of buying and holding low expense index funds when everywhere I look, someone claims to be making a fortune through trading.