Originally posted by: joecool
ok, i'm going to go out on a limb here and get flamed, but i have to ask ... now that GAT is available on the IS7, why is anyone buying the IC7 anymore?! i purchased my IC7 a week before the whole PAT/GAT thing happened, had been leaning towards the IS7 for the LAN and better AGP/PCI layout (open slot below AGP so you don't waste a PCI slot to give the vid card some breathing room), but went with the IC7 for PAT and performance. anyway, after GAT became available i decided to get an IS7 & do my own head-to-head comparison. results:
overclocking hits the same wall on both boards. my P4C just can't seem to do better than 247 FSB, even cranking cpu/mem ratio down to 3:2. sure wish i had one of those 300FSB parts!
at max speed, both boards use same mem timings: 2-3-3-7
depending on the benchmark, IC7 beats IS7 by 0-4%. this is truly in the noise level and may be due to the inherant random differences between benchmark runs. this is also only on benchmarks which are highly synthetic anyway. in real-world use i have experienced no observable diff. in performance at all!
so, to me the comparison boils down to this:
IC7 - slightly faster in some benchies (bragging rights), black pcb, black round floppy & ide cable (why only one?!), slick packaging.
IS7 - 30% cheaper, on-board LAN, better layout (no need to waste a PCI slot for vid cooling, better placement of 12V power connector).
seems like an obvious choice to me! i'll be sending my IC7 in for a refund this week!
caveat - in oc'ing i seem to be cpu-limited. for those lucky folks with more robust parts (which is completely a crap shoot), perhaps the IC7 will allow a higher level of overclocking. i don't know that this is true but i have seen some folks make this claim.
let the flame war begin ....