"last time you were here, you were advocating the notion of putting a cap on the amount of quantitative easing that was out there. i still think it's a good way to wind down the program. what we've learned is this ability for us to fine tune our purchases is very difficult to do. as desirables that may be in a conceptual sense,
the difficulty in september was we couldn't even move the flow pace at all. i think it's just very difficult. so i think we need to go back to where we were in the earlier rounds of qe where we set a total amount and then we executed that amount, we bought that purchase and then we stopped. and then we can reevaluate -- maybe we can get congress to vote on whether we raise the ceiling total and get them involved. we'll let the fed start using participation rate. get a monetary cliff going. we don't need anymore of this stuff."
(saw lots of articles over at Zerohedge about Stock vs. Flow (quantitative easing), and others about whether Fed was in a quagmire trying to exit QE. Comments on tv about this mornings jobs report seem to indicate a goldilocks type report (not too hot, not too cold, just right), and Jeff Cox apparently said some trader told him he thought market was now giving permission for Fed to taper sometime early near year (market finally accepting the taper is not tightening argument?)
(when taper talk started in summer, Art Cashin was mentioning that rate of QE was greater than nominal $85 billion / month, because of reinvestment of dividends and maturing principal. And Ben Bernanke, IIRC, explicitly stated in press conference after Septemter meeting, that Fed was continuing to reinvest dividends and maturing principal. Didn't pay much attention to Fed's decision at October meeting (no press conference), so we don't know what current status of reinvestment of dividends and maturing principal is.)
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101252720