- Mar 10, 2006
- 11,715
- 2,012
- 126
Think I'll wait for the Dec 21st dip to buy ...
Gonna wait a year?
Think I'll wait for the Dec 21st dip to buy ...
Think I'll wait for the Dec 21st dip to buy ...
Think I'll wait for the Dec 21st dip to buy ...
WOW. I totally effed up and misplayed this one. Major rally and I checked out completely last week. More specifically, my single holding (SU) is up 5% since Friday and I sold 2% below Friday's close. Just "lost" two weeks worth of pay. Shit.
On a totally unrelated note, my work PC is running a full system virus scan on a morning... I have no work to do, huh?
Regarding Ford, what are the "other current assets" of $70 billion?
If those are actual short term assets, I think Ford is indeed grossly undervalued.
How on Earth are they reducing that long term debt? They are reducing it which is a good thing. The thing is, it is nearing reasonable levels.
$40B market cap with over $10B in FCF?
Interesting.
How abut options? The Jan 2014s 10 strikes are only $2.50!
Is there a Euro summit Jan 21, Greece bond thing, US debt ceiling problem, or something else?
I sold MAS in the high $9s last week. Today it broke $11. Super pissed. Hoping to buy it back for under $9.
Today I sold off my WFC holding. Hoping to buy back on a dip. Would suck if it never dips again though.
nah, just a bit of fun about the world ending on Dec 21st this year.
Is there a Euro summit Jan 21, Greece bond thing, US debt ceiling problem, or something else?
When I looked at Ford in the fall, I believe the auto operation was essentially debt-free or about to be. (Hope I'm not mistaken.) Their LT debt is in their finance arm, and I'm sure their pension is still underfunded. Unfortunately they have tiny market share in China and European operations are a drag. If F dips back to the fall lows, I'll probably open a position.Regarding Ford, what are the "other current assets" of $70 billion?
If those are actual short term assets, I think Ford is indeed grossly undervalued.
How on Earth are they reducing that long term debt? They are reducing it which is a good thing. The thing is, it is nearing reasonable levels.
$40B market cap with over $10B in FCF?
Interesting.
How abut options? The Jan 2014s 10 strikes are only $2.50!
I'd be upset to see WFC run up. I think it is a $50 stock trading at under $30. USG has the same price/value disparity. Atleast I still own USG....
Considering they hit $420 last time during a market sell-off, your doctor most likely lost that bet.I have a $10 bet on the top before earnings, I'm saying $440, my doctor is saying $430.
You're thinking they won't beat?
Are any of those sites that pick stocks for you any good?
I remember looking at some typical sites which do that like the motley fool and never really seeing any big gains from their picks over a year. Are there better sites then these, perhaps subscription based?
WFC is bucking the trend with the few big banks (i.e. JPM, BAC, C, et al) and trading within a pretty tight range. From my observations, volatility for WFC is half that of the other 3 (i.e. if the other 3 drop 20%, WFC drops only 10%).
Still, it's a bank, and the Euro thing is hitting financials across the board. There's no way WFC will break out to >$30 when the others can't even make it back to their post-September highs.
How often does Apple beat the street? The last company that I remember doing that was Enron.
really? Because Apple's business is opaque and they fake all their profits?How often does Apple beat the street? The last company that I remember doing that was Enron.
Wasn't much of a debate, you made your valid points and they subsequently missed WS estimates. I'm certainly not insane like some bloggers to think growth won't taper off. Note when I say bloggers are frothing at the mouth, that's not at all complimentary.Didn't we have this debate last quarter as well?
The bloggers are all pro-AAPL trolls. Like I said last quarter the growth at redline will plateau at some point and the sell-side will have a better grip on where numbers come in. The reason the bloggosphere was right more than the sell side was that they were so often overly optimistic.
Considering they hit $420 last time during a market sell-off, your doctor most likely lost that bet.
Apple will probably beat their guidance, but I'm not certain they low-balled like they have done for the past umpteen quarters. $37B is a massive number and the bloggers are adding $6B on top of it. To put the difference into perspective, I believe $6B is about the size of Apple's quarterly Mac business in total.
Even if you adjust for the 14 weeks vs a standard 13 in a calendar quarter, $34.36B is a lot higher than their best-ever $28+ B quarter.
Andy Zaky's main argument is that Apple has always low-balled by 15% so they just did it again by a similar percentage. Well he was unapologetically wrong last time. Is it possible that Tim Cook decided to give more accurate guidance now that Steve's not the elephant in the room? To be fair, the bloggers were consistently good until just the last quarter.
Just doing some rough math to see how you'd even get to $43B revenue, not only would they need to sell over 30M iPhones, but you'd have to see record-breaking iPad AND Mac sales as well. (Everything else such as iTunes is in effect a rounding error.) The 4S launch is a huge tailwind but the Kindle Fire is a head wind that perhaps took away $1B in iPad sales. I'd be pleasantly surprised (but not shocked) if they hit $40B in quarterly revenue.
really? Because Apple's business is opaque and they fake all their profits?
