eits
Lifer
I'd probably go Gaacon regardless. I am picking Amendola over Garcon in my PPR league, but if it were standard scoring I would go Garcon.
KT
i picked amendola off the free agent list and put him in my lineup and benched roddy white.
I'd probably go Gaacon regardless. I am picking Amendola over Garcon in my PPR league, but if it were standard scoring I would go Garcon.
KT
I need 1 out of 4 for my Flex (WR/TE): Mike Williams, Antonio Gates, Brandon Myers, Golden Tate.
I'm leaning towards Williams.
Which D/ST should I start?
Houston vs. Minnesota
San Francisco @ Seattle
I need 1 out of 4 for my Flex (WR/TE): Mike Williams, Antonio Gates, Brandon Myers, Golden Tate.
I'm leaning towards Williams.
i picked amendola off the free agent list and put him in my lineup and benched roddy white.
I'd lean towards SF.. theoretically, the score should be low.
That's interesting. What's your reasoning for doing that?
That's interesting. What's your reasoning for doing that?
The ball will definitely go to Amendola. It won't necessarily go to White, who's battling a knee thing.
I picked up indy. KC is just so remarkably bad. Most of my defenses this year has been "whoever is playing KC", it's worked out quite well.
Indy did pretty well to contain Foster and Schaub last week for much of the game.
Ok, in a PPR league I guess it makes more sense. I was looking at that from a standard scoring pov.
As for Julio, I love that dude. I've started him every week this season. One or two weeks sucked, but he's been my workhorse. Besides the Bears, Julio's the only player left on my team from draft day. Personally, I wish White would just go away, he eats into my boys targets too much, haha!
Now in my situation the hardest choice is which DST to field in the one league where I'm in a championship. I picked up several, both to keep them away from my opponent and just to give myself more options. I have:
Seattle (vs. San Francisco)
Indianapolis (@ Kansas City)
Carolina (vs. Oakland)
Seattle has been outstanding the past couple weeks but that may be because they played the Cardinals and the Bills. Against a competent offense, and with potentially both starting corners out, I'm a bit nervous.
Then again, I could have gotten burned had I played the Detroit defense against the Cardinals last week (I played the Seahawks anyway). So I'm a bit nervous about starting a mediocre defense with a good matchup instead of a good defense with a bad matchup.
It's funny, for the first 7 weeks of the season, Roddy and Julio were alternating good fantasy days every other week. Julio was getting a touchdown in every road game, and Roddy was only catching them at home. Julio didn't get a home touchdown until last week and Roddy didn't get one on the road until two weeks ago.
One thing though, it doesn't always help one WR if another WR on his team comes out of a game. They can just double up on the last guy standing. Kind of the opposite of RBs, where when one guy goes down, the next guy up will get a lot more work.
i like carolina vs oakland. oakland is terribad.
True. Maybe I should wish for White to be replaced with a lesser WR vs. Julio being out there by himself.![]()
No way I would go near the Colts defence. No Chargers or Jets D out there?
KT
I could get the Chargers. Bad as the Jets are, though, I don't trust the Chargers at all either. And with McElroy starting instead of Mark "The Human Turnover" Sanchez, they aren't guaranteed 3+ interceptions. The Jets will probably just hand it off a million times.
![]()
What do you guys think of my lineup? Should I make any changes? I'm the guy on the left with Colin Kaepernick.
I know some people recommended that they would start another Def other than Houston but does anyone here know the match-ups like the back of their hand? As in, does Houston have any missing starting corners or does SD have any injured starting defensive ends? The reason I have opted to put Houston up there right now is because I am basing my lineup on a ranking's chart that has the highest Def accuracy for the year.
