I see that in the past 5 years, I have made quite a reputation here as the stock market thread has continuously grown. I appreciate the public, and private messages sent to me, and also the people who subscribed to my newsletter on this forum (and also to the good skeptism, as it produces useful dialogue).
Reputations are created and destroyed with key moments in time, but I'll say this:
I'm 90% certain Rambus won this case. The only question is the damage amount. Virtually all the juror requests to review material relate to Rambus' case in chief and evidence Rambus presented - none of it from the memory cartel.
For example, today they asked for Martinez. Mr. Martinez was a decision holder at Hyundai (now Hynix). Below is an excerpt from Rambus' evidence gathered at the FTC case which they won all the way through the Supreme Court:
551. In a July 1999 email, Mario Martinez of Hyundai recommended to Tabrizi and others at Hyundai that "(w)ith Samsung building significant amounts of [RDRAM], we need to work with them to limit the supply in the market, otherwise we both will be competing for market share which will result in an oversupply. We have to meet with Samsung and discuss our and their production plan, TAM analysis and targeted market share.
This is only a small snippet in a row of ducks about conspiring with competitors to fix prices and limit supply.