- Jan 23, 2002
- 2,206
- 12
- 81
Originally posted by: richardycc
here is my 'documentation' this week, bought MBRK at $2.98. trade with me, you might get rich too!![]()
Good documentation and nice gains. Sold it yet?
Originally posted by: richardycc
here is my 'documentation' this week, bought MBRK at $2.98. trade with me, you might get rich too!![]()
Originally posted by: thirtythree
I'm kind of embarrassed to admit that my investing strategy is based on Rule #1 by Phil Town, which recommends buying and selling based on technical indicators (moving average, MACD, and slow stochastic), but I don't know if this is sound advice since I'm still learning. (It also involves researching the companies beforehand, not just relying on technical indicators.)
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: thirtythree
I'm kind of embarrassed to admit that my investing strategy is based on Rule #1 by Phil Town, which recommends buying and selling based on technical indicators (moving average, MACD, and slow stochastic), but I don't know if this is sound advice since I'm still learning. (It also involves researching the companies beforehand, not just relying on technical indicators.)
I don't pay attention to technical analysis when picking stocks, mainly because I don't understand the interpretations and also the fact that I've been doing well so far without using them.
I can understand moving average, but once you start talking about stochastic, bollinger, resistance etc...you've already lost me there.
Originally posted by: Azurik
I just want a raise a word of caution on timing when the bottom is going to hit. A lot of people on here have never really experienced a recession before. Although the 2000-2002 hit the markets hard, particularly tech stocks, it was a pretty mild recession by definition.
A true recession will hit a lot of new investors hard, and will bring a lot of fear among those who never experienced one. Remember those stories of your parents not being able to sleep at night because they had a lot in the market, and even more dangerously, a lot in only one or two stocks?
In reality, we're only down about 10% or so and you see people crying already.
The best way to invest, for virtually everyone, is to be in index funds - and contribute a set amount on a timely cycle. You'll diversify your risk and mimic the market instead of trying to chase 100 baggers and be burned big time.
Originally posted by: Naustica
Originally posted by: Azurik
I just want a raise a word of caution on timing when the bottom is going to hit. A lot of people on here have never really experienced a recession before. Although the 2000-2002 hit the markets hard, particularly tech stocks, it was a pretty mild recession by definition.
A true recession will hit a lot of new investors hard, and will bring a lot of fear among those who never experienced one. Remember those stories of your parents not being able to sleep at night because they had a lot in the market, and even more dangerously, a lot in only one or two stocks?
In reality, we're only down about 10% or so and you see people crying already.
The best way to invest, for virtually everyone, is to be in index funds - and contribute a set amount on a timely cycle. You'll diversify your risk and mimic the market instead of trying to chase 100 baggers and be burned big time.
2000-2002 for tech stocks wasn't a recession. It was a freaking Depression. I'm talking Siberia type. When stocks like JDSU, ICGE , CMGI, Nortel, PMCS, AMCC, etc lose like 98% of its value from the high to never recover, that's like Armageddon. People on margin probably committed suicide. I have no idea how I survived.
One thing I learned though is how vicious the downturn is in the sector once the bubble pops. Saw it again with the housing stocks and now with the mortgage and financials.
Originally posted by: Azurik
Originally posted by: richardycc
here is my 'documentation' this week, bought MBRK at $2.98. trade with me, you might get rich too!![]()
Good documentation and nice gains. Sold it yet?
Originally posted by: thirtythree
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: thirtythree
I'm kind of embarrassed to admit that my investing strategy is based on Rule #1 by Phil Town, which recommends buying and selling based on technical indicators (moving average, MACD, and slow stochastic), but I don't know if this is sound advice since I'm still learning. (It also involves researching the companies beforehand, not just relying on technical indicators.)
I don't pay attention to technical analysis when picking stocks, mainly because I don't understand the interpretations and also the fact that I've been doing well so far without using them.
I can understand moving average, but once you start talking about stochastic, bollinger, resistance etc...you've already lost me there.
So do you get in/out of a company you want to invest in based on the trend, news, your gut... ?
Gotcha. I know it's still important to research the sectors/companies, but I meant as far as deciding when to get in or out. As far as research goes, I'm lucky my school has a subscription to Value Line. Much easier to find all the information than it is on the free sites, but I guess I shouldn't spoil myself too much.Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: thirtythree
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: thirtythree
I'm kind of embarrassed to admit that my investing strategy is based on Rule #1 by Phil Town, which recommends buying and selling based on technical indicators (moving average, MACD, and slow stochastic), but I don't know if this is sound advice since I'm still learning. (It also involves researching the companies beforehand, not just relying on technical indicators.)
I don't pay attention to technical analysis when picking stocks, mainly because I don't understand the interpretations and also the fact that I've been doing well so far without using them.
I can understand moving average, but once you start talking about stochastic, bollinger, resistance etc...you've already lost me there.
So do you get in/out of a company you want to invest in based on the trend, news, your gut... ?
All those things, and MOST importantly, their balance sheet, management, and key statistic ratios such as EPS growth, book value/share, history of paying dividends, etc...VS. their competitors.
You can find those statistics and many more through Yahoo Finance.
I generally pick several sectors that I think will be in favor, find mutual/index/ETF funds of the sector and then research the companies listed in those funds.
Gut is very important feeling BTW. I know it's saved my ass plenty of times.
Originally posted by: her209
Looks like AMD is headed on the way down again.
CSCO down -7% in after-hours trading on next quarter outlook.
Originally posted by: sniperruff
Originally posted by: her209
Looks like AMD is headed on the way down again.
CSCO down -7% in after-hours trading on next quarter outlook.
it's funny because i just read in the WSJ today that CSCO is a good solid company and is a bargain compared to AAPL or GOOG, yet it won't be going up anytime soon
think it's a good time to buy a hold for a year or two? it sure is cheap!
Originally posted by: her209
Looks like AMD is headed on the way down again.
Originally posted by: sniperruff
Originally posted by: her209
Looks like AMD is headed on the way down again.
CSCO down -7% in after-hours trading on next quarter outlook.
it's funny because i just read in the WSJ today that CSCO is a good solid company and is a bargain compared to AAPL or GOOG, yet it won't be going up anytime soon
think it's a good time to buy a hold for a year or two? it sure is cheap!
Originally posted by: Naustica
I don't like how the drugs are trading. The group as a whole hasn't been trading right since the beginning of the year and it's puzzling. My feeling coming into the year was that the drugs were going to outperform the market as people flee into recession proof stocks like drugs and nondurable consumer goods. So far that thesis has been wrong although it's still early. Drugs feel heavy and act like they want to go lower. Anybody has insight to something I might be missing or not seeing?