Whine, whine, whine. How about looking at Moonbeam's comment
in context, as a reply to your post Condor:
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Condor
You ignorant liberals have no idea what torture actually is. You also have no idea how Gtmo is being managed. You just read liberal propaganda and react. No matter how depraved the actions of the terrorists, you still cheer them.
You are a stupid terrorist, Condor, and in my world would be put away just so you couldn't breed.. Be glad the freedoms you wish to destroy still have you beyond my reach.
Note the presumption of guilt. At this point, our prisoners at Guantanamo are merely
alleged terrorists. The Bush administration claims they are terrorists, but has offered zero evidence. Condor and other Bush faithful nonetheless start with that presumption of guilt, then justify abuse as acceptable because they're "terrorists". There is no recognition that many of the prisoners may be guilty of nothing other than being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
In context, MB's reply just turns that presumption around 180 degrees, putting Condor on the receiving end of an unsupported claim that he is a terrorist. By Condor's "logic", that claim by itself is sufficient justification for locking him up. MB's reply was an (apparently vain) attempt to make Condor recognize it could just as easily be Condor's rights being denied. I think that's pretty clear from MB's closing line, "Be glad the freedoms you wish to destroy still have you beyond my reach." Calling this a threat is asinine, IMO.