- Nov 13, 2000
- 14,166
- 0
- 0
Hey guys, this has me stumped, so maybe you can shed some light 
We have one IP address (10.1.1.35) which, even when set on different computers, is unable to reach 10.1.3.10, our Alpha server for our Hospital Administration database. The two subnets are at two physically different locations, and are connected by a Cisco 2650 at either location, with a direct kilostream serial link between the two.
So it's:
10.1.1.35 - Switch - (Ethernet 10.1.1.1) Cisco 2650 (Serial 192.168.20.253) - WAN Link - (Serial 192.168.20.254) Cisco 2650 (Ethernet 10.1.3.1) - Switch - 10.1.3.10
From 10.1.1.35, I can connect to any other IP address on the 10.1.3.0 network, other than 10.1.3.10.
From any other address on the 10.1.1.0 network, I can connect to 10.1.3.10 just fine.
All physical links are fine, as if one of them was not working, then it would be causing chaos, as no one could connect to the administration system and the hospital would grind to a halt, and my phone would be ringing off the hook!
In doing a Tracert from any machine which has the IP address 10.1.1.35 to 10.1.3.10 gets the following:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 10.1.1.1
2 xx ms xx ms xx ms 192.168.20.254
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 * * * Request timed out.
etc til the tracert finishes.
From my machine (10.1.1.61) a tracert to 10.1.3.10 gets:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 10.1.1.1
2 xx ms xx ms xx ms 192.168.20.254
3 xx ms xx ms xx ms 10.1.3.10
(times are xx because of the current traffic on the WAN link, it changes)
My suspicion is that there is something set in the Router on the 10.1.3.0 network that is sending traffic from 10.1.1.35 off to some IP address that doesn't exist, rather than the right one, or some other weird thing to do with the router.
I have now set 3 computers up with the address 10.1.1.35, and all of them do the same, so it's not a HOSTS or computer error on this end.
Any thoughts/help/advice is much appreciated
Garry
We have one IP address (10.1.1.35) which, even when set on different computers, is unable to reach 10.1.3.10, our Alpha server for our Hospital Administration database. The two subnets are at two physically different locations, and are connected by a Cisco 2650 at either location, with a direct kilostream serial link between the two.
So it's:
10.1.1.35 - Switch - (Ethernet 10.1.1.1) Cisco 2650 (Serial 192.168.20.253) - WAN Link - (Serial 192.168.20.254) Cisco 2650 (Ethernet 10.1.3.1) - Switch - 10.1.3.10
From 10.1.1.35, I can connect to any other IP address on the 10.1.3.0 network, other than 10.1.3.10.
From any other address on the 10.1.1.0 network, I can connect to 10.1.3.10 just fine.
All physical links are fine, as if one of them was not working, then it would be causing chaos, as no one could connect to the administration system and the hospital would grind to a halt, and my phone would be ringing off the hook!
In doing a Tracert from any machine which has the IP address 10.1.1.35 to 10.1.3.10 gets the following:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 10.1.1.1
2 xx ms xx ms xx ms 192.168.20.254
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 * * * Request timed out.
etc til the tracert finishes.
From my machine (10.1.1.61) a tracert to 10.1.3.10 gets:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 10.1.1.1
2 xx ms xx ms xx ms 192.168.20.254
3 xx ms xx ms xx ms 10.1.3.10
(times are xx because of the current traffic on the WAN link, it changes)
My suspicion is that there is something set in the Router on the 10.1.3.0 network that is sending traffic from 10.1.1.35 off to some IP address that doesn't exist, rather than the right one, or some other weird thing to do with the router.
I have now set 3 computers up with the address 10.1.1.35, and all of them do the same, so it's not a HOSTS or computer error on this end.
Any thoughts/help/advice is much appreciated
Garry