• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

OCZ Vertex 2 prices?

The 120gb drive you see there is in a 3.5" format instead of 2.5" so that's why that's cheaper, why by that much I don't know. and the 50 vs 60, looks like from the product code I'd say the 60gb is the extended version of the 50, aka less reserve space for the controller to work with. That's my 2-cents.
 
Good question.

I bought the 50GB units for a RAID0 setup because they advertised a little faster speeds.

I'm pretty sure they are the same drives but the 50GB has 10GB more in over-provisioning than the 60GB version.
 
I believe OCZ is no longer selling drives with the higher over-provision amount anymore. So the 50GB/100GB etc. drives are essentially "discontinued" and prices always rise on an item as the supply peters out.
 
I was wondering the same thing. Amazon lists the 120gb for $279 and says it's a 2.5 inch drive. The 100gb is $320 and it is 2.5 inch so why the difference...
 
Got a link?
No, it's just deduction based on the fact that all their first drives had the higher over-provisioning. Based on testing such as Anand's in his articles, it was shown that they could lower that amount with no effect on performance. The "E" drives then began selling. Why would they continue to sell smaller drives when the bigger ones have the same performance?

I could be completely wrong, that's why I said "I believe".

EDIT: Sorry it's just their firmware that's determining the over-provisioning amount, and I doubt they're maintaining different versions of firmware. But again, I could be wrong.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top