OCZ Value VX

[sangyup81]

Anyone try these?

http://www.atacom.com/program/atacom.cg...T_AG_C2+&Disp_item2.x=4&Disp_item2.y=7

How high can you get 2-2-2 timings and at what voltage? I hope it performs close to the non-value VX memory. 🙂

 

[TomKazansky]

Generally saying, getting winbond utt on anything else besides on ocz vx is a gamble.

ocz vx is guranteed to run at that high voltage, about 3.5-3.6 volts. FSB will be stable up to 260 @ 2-2-2, and it won't crap out.

other winbond utt chips used on other pcb boards (like the ones you're showing us, and the twinmos sets that made the big news about a month ago) can also do the same thing, but many of them crapped out after a few weeks of high voltage boost.

 

[MobiusPizza]

I have no idea where to buy a pair of these. They look no way near to the just released article
http://www.anandtech.com/memory/showdoc.aspx?i=2392

At least it's timing sticker is no way the same as the one on atacom. It reads 2.5-2-2-7
I would say it's better to wait till the packaging of the Value VX exactly matches the image shown in
http://www.anandtech.com/memory/showdoc.aspx?i=2392&p=8
Although the part number does read the same

I think this is a newer reversion of the ram; and we better wait for its availability

 

[MobiusPizza]

UPDATE

said by Annihilator-X-:

Maybe 3-3-3-8 is an older version of it. The 2.5-2-2-7 Value VX although has the same part number, might be the newer reversion. I suggest waiting for it instead

said by NutCase:
Nope.. This is the Value VX and came right directly from an OCZ Rep (Bigtoe)..

said by Annihilator-X-:
hm why doesn't the stickers read 2.5-2-2-7 though
hm cause »images.anandtech.com/reviews/memory/ro..
does looks more promising

said by NutCase:
That is because the People at ATACOM are a bunch of Morons. They used the Pics and Info for the Older Value Series and modified it. about 50% of the Info on their website is wrong.

I am trying to get some other places to Get the Value VX but nothing yet..

That's quoted from another forum. It relieves me. Hope it answer some of the question people rised in comments of the recent article