Originally posted by: jonnyGURU
Originally posted by: orangat
I like xbitlabs reviews with their cross-loading and power regulation graph which is excellent imo because it shows whether the rails are regulated individually and how good regulation is throughout the whole range.
Given the very low 3.3/5v requirements of current typical pc's, I like to see how psu's really perform when the 12v rail(s) is maxed out while the 3.3/5v load remain low.
The more I've learned, the more I've realized Oleg likes drama.
Even a PC built with only one hard drive and one optical and one floppy, idle, is going to have a static 5V load of 4 to 5A. That's well above the minimum load requirements of most power supplies.
And keep in mind that a power supply taps it's 3.3V rail off of the 5V rail with a VR, so you can add whatever your 3.3V load is, times 3.3, divided by 5, to that number. So consider your RAM, PCI cards, whatever else you might have in your build.
I was "suckered" into doing crossload tests by someone who thought that Silverstone's 3A minimum 5V load requirement was unrealistic. I then found myself doing unrealistic high and low 3.3V+5V crossload tests on power supplies. What a mess. I was taking points away from power supplies that didn't deserve to be graded on that kind of curve.
And the FSP/OCZ 700 is one of them. There's no independent regulation whatsoever, but I'm sure FSP feels perfectly fine with that decision because of the way computers work today.
The only "realistic" crossload scenario is someone throwing an ATX12V power supply in an old ATX board where the CPU's voltage is regulated off of the 5V rail. But seriously, if someone is still using a motherboard w/o a P4 2x2 connector and hooks up an ATX12V power supply, they deserve to have their stuff blow up.
😉