OctoMom Scores a House!!!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

MrMatt

Banned
Mar 3, 2009
3,905
7
0
Meanwhile someone who's NOT a worthless piece of shit and only had one or two kids can't get a job or a house. I would spit in this woman's face if I met her. Worthless slag.
 

Platypus

Lifer
Apr 26, 2001
31,046
321
136
fucks sake, can we consolidate all of these octocunt threads into one place PLEASE?
 

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
Originally posted by: halik
STOP

The more you post about this bullshit, the longer it will take to DIAF. Seriously, just keep it to yourself.
that.

the fact that she's getting so much attention from the media + us, the general public, the more money she will be fed. So I don't understand if it annoys you people that she's getting all this... why continue to feed it? I swear this is like hating on tabloids/celebs.
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,920
2,161
126
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Make it stop! Make her go away!

Can't Joe the Plumber do something about this?




Damn, why isn't anyone giving me a house, or money, or anything like that? Oh wait, I didn't have two full litters of spawn.

You, my friend, have scored my QUOTE OF THE DAY!
 

phoenix79

Golden Member
Jan 17, 2000
1,598
0
0
Originally posted by: quakefiend420
Originally posted by: QueBert
depending on how much was put down, which I would bet was well over 50%, she will be able to pay it off in no time. People are donating money to her left and right. I wouldn't be shocked if the home was totally paid off close to when she moves in. She's crazy, but people are even more crazy to send her money. And worse comes to worse, Vivid video has offered her a million bucks to a porn. Assuming she hasn't already told them yes. One porn would easily pay for what wasn't paid on the down payment. For her to lose this house would be almost impossible.

who the fuck would watch that?

I could see this becoming the next 2G1C....



:vomit:
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Zebo
What's the problem? She decouples from welfare, due to her income and assets, this is a good thing.

You see it's not her house, her income or her money. She'll still get welfare, social security, etc because she qualifies for it.

She is completely milking the system and there isn't a darn thing we can do about it. Happens all the time.
 
Jan 18, 2001
14,465
1
0
2,583 square-foot comes out to about what??? 170ish sq ft per person? Take away kitchen, closet, and bath room space and you're probably talking less than 100 sq ft / person.

That would drive me insane, but then again she probably already qualifies!
 

roid450

Senior member
Sep 4, 2008
858
0
0
Originally posted by: Platypus
fucks sake, can we consolidate all of these octocunt threads into one place PLEASE?

Yes, into hell, these fucking threads are getting annoying and I agree about sterilizing her... with fire :thumbsup:




Duggars anyone? :p
 

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,675
146
106
www.neftastic.com
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Zebo
What's the problem? She decouples from welfare, due to her income and assets, this is a good thing.

You see it's not her house, her income or her money. She'll still get welfare, social security, etc because she qualifies for it.

She is completely milking the system and there isn't a darn thing we can do about it. Happens all the time.

On the contrary - she is the recipient of the donations, hence it is her income. She has a very rude awakening come next tax season, because mark my words - she doesn't think it's the same as taxable wage. She's not a non-profit.

And I fail to see how "her dad" is the buyer if the funds are coming from "her" donations. Lest she gift the money to her dad, at which point it will be double-taxed after the gift deduction. Oh, and lets not forget the fact that once the current house if foreclosed upon the new one will have a lien against it if it really is in her dad's name.

She is setting herself up for epic failure on the grandest scale.
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
20,585
3,796
126
Originally posted by: TruePaige
Originally posted by: judasmachine
sterilize her now, please, and with fire.

Better nuke her from orbit.

It's the only way to be sure.

Its too late - she has already spawned. We are doomed
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: SunnyD

On the contrary - she is the recipient of the donations, hence it is her income. She has a very rude awakening come next tax season, because mark my words - she doesn't think it's the same as taxable wage. She's not a non-profit.

And I fail to see how "her dad" is the buyer if the funds are coming from "her" donations. Lest she gift the money to her dad, at which point it will be double-taxed after the gift deduction. Oh, and lets not forget the fact that once the current house if foreclosed upon the new one will have a lien against it if it really is in her dad's name.

She is setting herself up for epic failure on the grandest scale.

There is an accountant working for them, you can be certain of that. Dad bought the house, she's just living in it. So technically she hasn't received anything and the donations could be going to her parents, not her. This way she can report no income and get all those huge gubment checks.
 

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,675
146
106
www.neftastic.com
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: SunnyD

On the contrary - she is the recipient of the donations, hence it is her income. She has a very rude awakening come next tax season, because mark my words - she doesn't think it's the same as taxable wage. She's not a non-profit.

And I fail to see how "her dad" is the buyer if the funds are coming from "her" donations. Lest she gift the money to her dad, at which point it will be double-taxed after the gift deduction. Oh, and lets not forget the fact that once the current house if foreclosed upon the new one will have a lien against it if it really is in her dad's name.

She is setting herself up for epic failure on the grandest scale.

There is an accountant working for them, you can be certain of that. Dad bought the house, she's just living in it. So technically she hasn't received anything and the donations could be going to her parents, not her. This way she can report no income and get all those huge gubment checks.

Her dad bought the house with what money? Supposedly all the money she is getting is "going into a trust for the kids". There's been no mention of an accountant handling anything - I bet her two PR firms were supposed to handle that detail for her. I'm telling you... she is in for a world of hurt next year.
 

mchammer187

Diamond Member
Nov 26, 2000
9,114
0
76
Doesn't she have several hundred thousand in medical bills?

8 infants for well over a month all born premature and according to wikipedia she has no insurance
 

sactoking

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2007
7,649
2,925
136
Originally posted by: SunnyD
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Zebo
What's the problem? She decouples from welfare, due to her income and assets, this is a good thing.

You see it's not her house, her income or her money. She'll still get welfare, social security, etc because she qualifies for it.

She is completely milking the system and there isn't a darn thing we can do about it. Happens all the time.

On the contrary - she is the recipient of the donations, hence it is her income. She has a very rude awakening come next tax season, because mark my words - she doesn't think it's the same as taxable wage. She's not a non-profit.

And I fail to see how "her dad" is the buyer if the funds are coming from "her" donations. Lest she gift the money to her dad, at which point it will be double-taxed after the gift deduction. Oh, and lets not forget the fact that once the current house if foreclosed upon the new one will have a lien against it if it really is in her dad's name.

She is setting herself up for epic failure on the grandest scale.

Check the tax code. The DONOR is responsible for taxes on gifts given, not the donee. That money is 100% tax-free to her.
 

oiprocs

Diamond Member
Jun 20, 2001
3,780
2
0
Originally posted by: halik
STOP

The more you post about this bullshit, the longer it will take to DIAF. Seriously, just keep it to yourself.

You are my hero.

:heart:
 

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,675
146
106
www.neftastic.com
She now says she's the one buying the house...

Suleman said she is paying for the house with money from "opportunities" she has selected, but did not elaborate on what they were.

Maybe she DID take the porn deal... since:

She also said she had been hoping to receive some donations to support the children's care, through the non-profit organization Angels in Waiting, but no donations have been made.

Apparently she isn't getting the donations she though she was going to get? Though anything coming out of her mouth is probably a lie (unless it's a babby).
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126
I'm really, really getting tired of hearing about her all the time. Please make it stop!

She really is a whackjob timebomb. Once this all dies down, wait a few years, she'll have a meltdown of epic proportions. Trust me. The gal ain't right.
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: compuwiz1
I'm really, really getting tired of hearing about her all the time. Please make it stop!

I just feel bad for the kids. They don't have a fighting chance.
 

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,675
146
106
www.neftastic.com
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: compuwiz1
I'm really, really getting tired of hearing about her all the time. Please make it stop!

I just feel bad for the kids. They don't have a fighting chance.

In some ways - it would have been better if they didn't have a fighting chance.
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
Originally posted by: barfo
Social Services should take her kids away from her, all of them.

Why? She is certainly not the first nor the last person to have more than 10 children. I hate the attention she gets just as much as the next person, but so far she has done nothing to warrant her kids being taken away.