Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: fishface313
1,920,000 pixels = 1.92MP i win!
A megapixel count is determined by the number of photodetectors, not by the number of pixels in the file produced.
Originally posted by: mobobuff
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: fishface313
1,920,000 pixels = 1.92MP i win!
A megapixel count is determined by the number of photodetectors, not by the number of pixels in the file produced.
Yeah, but you phrased your question incorrectly. You asked, "how many Megapixels are these pics?". The answer to that poorly phrased question would be 1.92.
It's hard to guess the megapixel rating of the image sensor of the camera that took the pictures without knowing a few things first, such as...
- Were the pictures in question resized in any way, either by logic on the camera or software on a computer?
- Were the images compressed by anything other than the camera?
- What type of camera was it? Without specifying the megapixel rating, of course.
Originally posted by: OdiN
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: fishface313
1,920,000 pixels = 1.92MP i win!
A megapixel count is determined by the number of photodetectors, not by the number of pixels in the file produced.
Not true unless the image was resized.
Like my 8.2MP has images that are 3504x2336 pixels. Which when multiplied = 8,185,344 pixels.
Close enough to 8.2MP...just round up.
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
It looks like either digital zoom was used or there was no resizing. It looks like a normal 100% crop from a consumer level P&S. So I'd say 2MP.
BTW, this is a stupid comparison. Image quality has to do with A LOT of factors - sensor size, lens, settings used, JPG processing, just to name a few. An 8MP P&S resized to 4MP is not going to look anywhere as good as a 4MP Nikon D2Hs, at 100% crop.
If it was re-sized, then it doesn't matter how many megapixels the image was shot at.Originally posted by: dnuggett
You sure it wasn't resized? 😉Originally posted by: Glavinsolo
1200x1600 is 2mp
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
It looks like either digital zoom was used or there was no resizing. It looks like a normal 100% crop from a consumer level P&S. So I'd say 2MP.
BTW, this is a stupid comparison. Image quality has to do with A LOT of factors - sensor size, lens, settings used, JPG processing, just to name a few. An 8MP P&S resized to 4MP is not going to look anywhere as good as a 4MP Nikon D2Hs, at 100% crop.
Then don't respond. You don't understand the context of the reason I am taking the poll, hence you want to call it stupid. Your ignorance is no reason to call something you don't understand stupid. If you disagree with the frickin poll, move on.
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
If it was re-sized, then it doesn't matter how many megapixels the image was shot at.Originally posted by: dnuggett
You sure it wasn't resized? 😉Originally posted by: Glavinsolo
1200x1600 is 2mp
ZV
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
It looks like either digital zoom was used or there was no resizing. It looks like a normal 100% crop from a consumer level P&S. So I'd say 2MP.
BTW, this is a stupid comparison. Image quality has to do with A LOT of factors - sensor size, lens, settings used, JPG processing, just to name a few. An 8MP P&S resized to 4MP is not going to look anywhere as good as a 4MP Nikon D2Hs, at 100% crop.
Then don't respond. You don't understand the context of the reason I am taking the poll, hence you want to call it stupid. Your ignorance is no reason to call something you don't understand stupid. If you disagree with the frickin poll, move on.
OK I apologize for being ignorant.. what is your reasoning and context then?
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Any last chance guesses?