• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Objective look... how many Megapixels are these pics? ** NOW UPDATED **

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I don't think it's possible for a person to look at a picture and guess the original resolution before resizing. If you really want to make a point, take a picture at several resolutions and post resize them all to 1600x1200 and let us make a judgement on which ones are better.
 
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: fishface313
1,920,000 pixels = 1.92MP i win!

A megapixel count is determined by the number of photodetectors, not by the number of pixels in the file produced.

Not true unless the image was resized.

Like my 8.2MP has images that are 3504x2336 pixels. Which when multiplied = 8,185,344 pixels.

Close enough to 8.2MP...just round up.
 
Originally posted by: mobobuff
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: fishface313
1,920,000 pixels = 1.92MP i win!

A megapixel count is determined by the number of photodetectors, not by the number of pixels in the file produced.

Yeah, but you phrased your question incorrectly. You asked, "how many Megapixels are these pics?". The answer to that poorly phrased question would be 1.92.

It's hard to guess the megapixel rating of the image sensor of the camera that took the pictures without knowing a few things first, such as...

- Were the pictures in question resized in any way, either by logic on the camera or software on a computer?
- Were the images compressed by anything other than the camera?
- What type of camera was it? Without specifying the megapixel rating, of course.


No if you re-read the question I'm asking what the MP rating of the camera is. The title is there to draw you in. If I asked what the MP rating of the camera is on the title not many people will come in, or they'd suggest something like "what's the model #" and "Go google it."

I can't tell you if they were resized in anyway because if I do then that skews the results and eliminates or concludes a choice based on my answer. I can tell you that the image you are looking at is exact in detail from the camera with possible resizing, but I obviously can't confirm it was or wasn't resized.
 
Originally posted by: OdiN
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: fishface313
1,920,000 pixels = 1.92MP i win!

A megapixel count is determined by the number of photodetectors, not by the number of pixels in the file produced.

Not true unless the image was resized.

Like my 8.2MP has images that are 3504x2336 pixels. Which when multiplied = 8,185,344 pixels.

Close enough to 8.2MP...just round up.

Right, but that gets back to the whole resize prob.

In any event I'm going to wait a bit longer (til morning) and see what the tally looks like.
 
It looks like either digital zoom was used or there was no resizing. It looks like a normal 100% crop from a consumer level P&S. So I'd say 2MP.
BTW, this is a stupid comparison. Image quality has to do with A LOT of factors - sensor size, lens, settings used, JPG processing, just to name a few. An 8MP P&S resized to 4MP is not going to look anywhere as good as a 4MP Nikon D2Hs, at 100% crop.
 
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
It looks like either digital zoom was used or there was no resizing. It looks like a normal 100% crop from a consumer level P&S. So I'd say 2MP.
BTW, this is a stupid comparison. Image quality has to do with A LOT of factors - sensor size, lens, settings used, JPG processing, just to name a few. An 8MP P&S resized to 4MP is not going to look anywhere as good as a 4MP Nikon D2Hs, at 100% crop.

Then don't respond. You don't understand the context of the reason I am taking the poll, hence you want to call it stupid. Your ignorance is no reason to call something you don't understand stupid. If you disagree with the frickin poll, move on.
 
I think it's probably between 3 and 4 MP from a point and shoot digital camera, because:

1) The type of noise does not look like something that one would see from a DSLR under these conditions
2) The noise, however, does not look like what I'm used to seeing at 1:1 in a P&S image, hence I think that it was resized down slightly
3) It was not resized down a lot (from a high-MP camera), I suspect, because if it were, even a P&S would appear to have decent noise properties at this resolution under these conditions
4) The areas without detail seem to have a "painterly" appearance to them, which could come from a Kodak 14n or a P&S (I wager the latter, obviously)
5) Finally, I think the images were resized down because I don't see (m)any JPEG artifacts that I would expect if the image were straight from the type of camera that I suspect was used.
 
It's almost impossible to tell. The amount of infomation contained in the files can only tell you so much. If the focus is not right, your picture won't contain as much actual detail of the subject as if the focus were sharp.

We can only say that the picture on the screen is about 2 megapixels. Whether the camera is capable of more than that, I don't know. Whether the lens was capable of shooting sharper than that, I don't know.

I'm going to say that it's a 2 megapixel camera. And the color doesn't look like Canon, so I'm going to guess and say Sony. Want me to get even more specific and make a wilder guess? DSC-F505.

 
There's a bit of noise in the image, enough so that I'm guessing it's a P&S Camera.

It also looks like the images are a bit blurred, as though they were cropped from a larger image. There's not a lot of detail in them. It could be straight out of a 2MP Camera I suppose, or just that the image is beyond the resolution capabilities of the lens.

In any event, I'm not sure what your objective is. Personally... I didn't purchase any of my cameras baed on MP value, the same way I wouldn't purchase a car based on the HP/Torque numbers but, it is/was a factor in my decision.
 
my guess is 2 but shouldnt the poll be 1-2 than 3-4? the way it is now if you guess 1-2 or 2-3 your both right.
 
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: Glavinsolo
1200x1600 is 2mp
You sure it wasn't resized? 😉
If it was re-sized, then it doesn't matter how many megapixels the image was shot at.

I can tell you that your lens isn't as sharp as it could be and that the image sensor is clipping highlights a bit though. My guess is that they were shot on either a pretty good point and shoot or a DSLR with a low-end lens (like a Sigma lens or something slimilar).

ZV
 
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
It looks like either digital zoom was used or there was no resizing. It looks like a normal 100% crop from a consumer level P&S. So I'd say 2MP.
BTW, this is a stupid comparison. Image quality has to do with A LOT of factors - sensor size, lens, settings used, JPG processing, just to name a few. An 8MP P&S resized to 4MP is not going to look anywhere as good as a 4MP Nikon D2Hs, at 100% crop.

Then don't respond. You don't understand the context of the reason I am taking the poll, hence you want to call it stupid. Your ignorance is no reason to call something you don't understand stupid. If you disagree with the frickin poll, move on.

OK I apologize for being ignorant.. what is your reasoning and context then?
 
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
It looks like either digital zoom was used or there was no resizing. It looks like a normal 100% crop from a consumer level P&S. So I'd say 2MP.
BTW, this is a stupid comparison. Image quality has to do with A LOT of factors - sensor size, lens, settings used, JPG processing, just to name a few. An 8MP P&S resized to 4MP is not going to look anywhere as good as a 4MP Nikon D2Hs, at 100% crop.

Then don't respond. You don't understand the context of the reason I am taking the poll, hence you want to call it stupid. Your ignorance is no reason to call something you don't understand stupid. If you disagree with the frickin poll, move on.

OK I apologize for being ignorant.. what is your reasoning and context then?


As soon as I'm ready to tell the MP count I'll give out the reasoning as well. I need more poll #'s though.
 
Back
Top