Obama's plan includes mortgage prinicpal reduction!

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Originally posted by: Kelvrick
Originally posted by: GoPackGo
Originally posted by: Kelvrick
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
At this point what's the alternative?

Fuck them

Who?
Those who would receive direct assistance from this.

Like myself and my wife, who did have a mortgage we could easily afford, but because she just got laid off unexpectedly, we are clearly in the wrong and don't deserve a chance to keep our home.
I do agree that people who made 60k a year and bought a 500k home don't deserve a bailout, but there are plenty of honest people who got ROYALLY FUCKED by this economy through no fault of their own.
I know we will scrimp and cut corners wherever we can, like millions of others, and hopefully that will get us through this, I don't even know if my wife and I qualify, our home value did drop dramatically, but i don't know in what ratio to what we owe.
So basically, try to empathize with some of the people out there. They deserve some help and empathy, and just aren't sucking the govt teat to get by.

I emphasize. My best friend bought a house on an arm 5 years ago and it adjusted last year. He could still make the payments, but then mervyns declared bankruptcy and he lost a job. He went out and got another job at Steve and Barry's and then they went under as well. There aren't many places hiring retail store managers anymore.

I feel for him because he's worked really hard and put a lot of money in that house. But, he's probably going to lose the house and I don't want him bailed out. I have a couple of coworkers in similar situations and I'm looking forward to another wave of foreclosures.

Why? Me and my fiance/wife currently live in a rented master bedroom with ~100k combined income and are hoping to buy a house in the ~250k range with 25k in savings. Eventually the market will correct.

I say let the banks that didn't screw themselves over buy up assets at a discount and grow.


Sorry dude...but 80/20 is the rule for the most part these days.

Kind of my point. I'm still screwed and living in a room while trying to save and other people get to keep their house on my taxes? Not exactly what I'd like to see.

Maybe another wave of foreclosures and the houses I'm looking at will drop to 200k and I can buy a house now. We're planning it so if one of us loses our job, we can still make house payments on a 30 year fixed rate on one income.

Which is exactly what everyone should do. It's called being responsible for yourself and not crying to the government for help living beyond your means.

:thumbsup:
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: Kelvrick
Maybe another wave of foreclosures and the houses I'm looking at will drop to 200k and I can buy a house now. We're planning it so if one of us loses our job, we can still make house payments on a 30 year fixed rate on one income.
You are a perfect example of the kind of person I'm talking about. Still able to buy a home, and smart enough to buy it based on a single person's employment. You have savings, too. I think people have been allowed by the market to buy homes too early and too big. I bet our parents were not buying four bedroom homes when they were 25, were they?
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
At this point what's the alternative?

Fuck them

Who?
Those who would receive direct assistance from this.

There is no difference between keeping the person in the house with a lesser mortgage value and foreclosing on the house.

Where does it end? Do we "help" people who bought vehicles they can't afford? Do we subsidize people renting so that they can still afford their aparments?

I'm sick of this whole government is the answer bullshit.

You are cost neutral in this position.

You have a $100,000 mortgage and a $50,000 house. You kick the person out of the house you lose out on mortgage payments on a $50K mortgage *AND* you have to pay for maintenance, HOA, and taxes. You keep them in the house and you get all of that paid for.

What is the fucking difference? Get over your neantrathalic "ME GRIMLOCK ME SMASH" silliness and think for a change.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,862
6,396
126
It seems many are still confused by what's going on. These are not Ordinary Times with Agneda laden Politicians thrown in looking to revolutionize the Market. This is a Market Meltdown the likes of which hasn't been seen in Generations and one in which we have yet to hit Bottom.
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
The #'s Obama is throwing out don't add up. He is either a liar, or he is stupid. $75billion/9 million people = $8333.33 per person bailed out. How many people who are upside down on their mortgages are only $8k upside down? These #'s are complete shit, and Obama is either LYING about the amount it will cost, or the # of people it will help. Or he is just too stupid to do the math on this.

This is another BS bill by the democrats which isn't going to help but yet makes all the morons of the world cheer that Obama is 'doing something' to help the little man. Of course, he then went on to say we need to stop living beyond our means. WHY? Obama will just bail you out... and if its good for PEOPLE to stop living beyond their means, its good for government as well..

This plan is BULLSHIT and is another LIE by this TRAITOR of a President (Oops, sorry, Harvey macro must have slipped in there)
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,862
6,396
126
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
The #'s Obama is throwing out don't add up. He is either a liar, or he is stupid. $75billion/9 million people = $8333.33 per person bailed out. How many people who are upside down on their mortgages are only $8k upside down? These #'s are complete shit, and Obama is either LYING about the amount it will cost, or the # of people it will help. Or he is just too stupid to do the math on this.

This is another BS bill by the democrats which isn't going to help but yet makes all the morons of the world cheer that Obama is 'doing something' to help the little man. Of course, he then went on to say we need to stop living beyond our means. WHY? Obama will just bail you out... and if its good for PEOPLE to stop living beyond their means, its good for government as well..

This plan is BULLSHIT and is another LIE by this TRAITOR of a President (Oops, sorry, Harvey macro must have slipped in there)

Weak Troll is weak.
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
You are cost neutral in this position.

You have a $100,000 mortgage and a $50,000 house. You kick the person out of the house you lose out on mortgage payments on a $50K mortgage *AND* you have to pay for maintenance, HOA, and taxes. You keep them in the house and you get all of that paid for.

What is the fucking difference? Get over your neantrathalic "ME GRIMLOCK ME SMASH" silliness and think for a change.
If it's so beneficial for the banks to keep these people in their homes, then why do they need my tax dollars as an incentive?
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
Seriously, Im willing to bet after the cram down to "TMV" youll see a bunch of people toss the homes up for sale to get out of the alligator, the sudden supply will drop prices futher, and then well have to cram down again in a year or so.

The banks will get pissed at losing so much money that theyll jack interest rates up, and the regular renter joe will get hosed on both end by higher taxes and interest rates.
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: Robor
Um, yeah. Didn't I hear John McCain talk about buying up bad mortgages?
Don't get your panties in a wad - I didn't vote for him either.

Then stop making partisan statements when both sides share blame.
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: Robor
Then stop making partisan statements when both sides share blame.
This is a statement by a D and will likely get passed on party lines by the D's with the R's in opposition, just like the "stimulus" bill. That's the great part about being a life-long independent: I get to make fun of all the idiots rather than just half of them.
 

Xavier434

Lifer
Oct 14, 2002
10,373
1
0
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: Robor
Then stop making partisan statements when both sides share blame.
This is a statement by a D and will likely get passed on party lines by the D's with the R's in opposition, just like the "stimulus" bill. That's the great part about being a life-long independent: I get to make fun of all the idiots rather than just half of them.

Good for you. While you are content with being a cynical skeptic trying to say , "I told you so!" as much as humanly possible, the rest of us will do our best to objectively discuss and work towards solutions to the problems. Enjoy your ride on our wagon.
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
You are cost neutral in this position.

You have a $100,000 mortgage and a $50,000 house. You kick the person out of the house you lose out on mortgage payments on a $50K mortgage *AND* you have to pay for maintenance, HOA, and taxes. You keep them in the house and you get all of that paid for.

What is the fucking difference? Get over your neantrathalic "ME GRIMLOCK ME SMASH" silliness and think for a change.
If it's so beneficial for the banks to keep these people in their homes, then why do they need my tax dollars as an incentive?

Exactly
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
You are cost neutral in this position.

You have a $100,000 mortgage and a $50,000 house. You kick the person out of the house you lose out on mortgage payments on a $50K mortgage *AND* you have to pay for maintenance, HOA, and taxes. You keep them in the house and you get all of that paid for.

What is the fucking difference? Get over your neantrathalic "ME GRIMLOCK ME SMASH" silliness and think for a change.
If it's so beneficial for the banks to keep these people in their homes, then why do they need my tax dollars as an incentive?

Is it just the banks who'll get hurt? Who holds all of the ABS bonds? 401ks, mutual funds, pensions...etc. Furthermore, if it were just the banks, helping with the interest lowers interest rates overall.
 

spacejamz

Lifer
Mar 31, 2003
10,995
1,745
126
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
The #'s Obama is throwing out don't add up. He is either a liar, or he is stupid. $75billion/9 million people = $8333.33 per person bailed out. How many people who are upside down on their mortgages are only $8k upside down? These #'s are complete shit, and Obama is either LYING about the amount it will cost, or the # of people it will help. Or he is just too stupid to do the math on this.

This is another BS bill by the democrats which isn't going to help but yet makes all the morons of the world cheer that Obama is 'doing something' to help the little man. Of course, he then went on to say we need to stop living beyond our means. WHY? Obama will just bail you out... and if its good for PEOPLE to stop living beyond their means, its good for government as well..

This plan is BULLSHIT and is another LIE by this TRAITOR of a President (Oops, sorry, Harvey macro must have slipped in there)

Weak Troll is weak.

Uh, those are the numbers directly from the AP article...what facts, if any, are you basing your post on???
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Good for you. While you are content with being a cynical skeptic trying to say , "I told you so!" as much as humanly possible, the rest of us will do our best to objectively discuss and work towards solutions to the problems. Enjoy your ride on our wagon.
I have already solved the problem by not spending beyond my means, living conservatively, and working my ass off to make sure I'll always have a job. Now, as a reward for my hard work and prudence, I'll be funding your trip on the short bus with my tax dollars.
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
The #'s Obama is throwing out don't add up. He is either a liar, or he is stupid. $75billion/9 million people = $8333.33 per person bailed out. How many people who are upside down on their mortgages are only $8k upside down? These #'s are complete shit, and Obama is either LYING about the amount it will cost, or the # of people it will help. Or he is just too stupid to do the math on this.

This is another BS bill by the democrats which isn't going to help but yet makes all the morons of the world cheer that Obama is 'doing something' to help the little man. Of course, he then went on to say we need to stop living beyond our means. WHY? Obama will just bail you out... and if its good for PEOPLE to stop living beyond their means, its good for government as well..

This plan is BULLSHIT and is another LIE by this TRAITOR of a President (Oops, sorry, Harvey macro must have slipped in there)

Weak Troll is weak.

These are Obama's #'s.. it doesn't add up. Is he lying or is he stupid?
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: Robor
Then stop making partisan statements when both sides share blame.
This is a statement by a D and will likely get passed on party lines by the D's with the R's in opposition, just like the "stimulus" bill. That's the great part about being a life-long independent: I get to make fun of all the idiots rather than just half of them.

Good for you. While you are content with being a cynical skeptic trying to say , "I told you so!" as much as humanly possible, the rest of us will do our best to objectively discuss and work towards solutions to the problems. Enjoy your ride on our wagon.

You aren't solving jack shit.
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: Robor
Then stop making partisan statements when both sides share blame.
This is a statement by a D and will likely get passed on party lines by the D's with the R's in opposition, just like the "stimulus" bill. That's the great part about being a life-long independent: I get to make fun of all the idiots rather than just half of them.

And McCain made a statement about buying bad mortgage debt during his presidential campaign. Last I checked he was still an (R). FWIW, my brother is an (I) converted from (R) and I'll tell him the same thing I tell you. If your awesome party has all the answers they would be in power by now. They're not. Maybe there's a reason?
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: Robor
And McCain made a statement about buying bad mortgage debut during his presidential campaign. Last I checked he was still an (R). FWIW, my brother is an (I) converted from (R) and I'll tell him the same thing I tell you. If your awesome party has all the answers they would be in power by now. They're not. Maybe there's a reason?
I don't have a party. I do have all the answers. Unfortunately, all of the knuckle draggers who get to vote are already affiliated with one of the parties, neither of which has any answers (well, maybe a few bad answers, but mostly just no answers). Political parties are the problem, not the solution, but I don't want to go into that in this thread.
 

Double Trouble

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,270
103
106
This is what you get when you put socialists in office: punishment of those who are responsible and make good decisions in favor of redistributing the wealth to those who make bad decisions.
 

BigDH01

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2005
1,631
88
91
Originally posted by: Double Trouble
This is what you get when you put socialists in office: punishment of those who are responsible and make good decisions in favor of redistributing the wealth to those who make bad decisions.

Oh God, so many problems with this.

I have some thought exercises for you:

1) Define Socialism.

2) List all the Socialist politicians elected last cycle.

3) Explain how the politicians on this list are Socialists. Presumably, this explanation will involve how the politicians feel about Capitalist means of production, class structure, the evolution of Capitalism into Socialism, state ownership of industry, farming collectives, etc, etc.

After you can do these things, I will take your statement seriously. Until then, quit throwing around the term Socialist in an attempt to generate a rise out of people.

The whole collapse and bailout has nothing to do with Capitalism, Socialism, Interventionalism, Isolationalism, Libertarianism, Republicanism, Democratism, Communism, or any plethora of other -ism's. The only -ism that comes close to describing the situation is Cronyism. It's a massive wealth grab by those in power sponsored by those politicians they got elected. If the banks weren't hurting right now, no one would give a flying f#@k about the situation. Now, they only have to pretend to care due to the already massive bailouts given to the elite. Proof? They are throwing G$75 at a problem which is measured in the trillions. I don't agree with helping anyone that made very irresponsible decisions in the name of greed, but let's be honest about what this foreclosure prevention act really is: table scraps. An attempt to appease a large group of people about to be thrown into the streets, or at least make the rest of us think the government really cares about the poor/middle-class (even if many of these people don't deserve their care). The turkey has already been consumed by those powerful enough not to care about the distinction between Republican and Democrat; Capitalist or Socialist.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
So how do I make it look like I'm an irresponsible home owner so I can get my slice of the irresponsibility pie?