Originally posted by: chowderhead
Originally posted by: Pabster
Did anyone else notice that...AGAIN...Hillary didn't even take a few seconds to Congratulate Obama on his victory? :roll:
Once again she runs out of town early and off to her next supposed "Firewall" ... :laugh:
The only question now is which drawer the concession of race speech sits in.
get over yourself Pabster - your candidate is the one of hope and turning the page and you just post page after page of attacks on Clinton. Listen to your candidate because he will need Clinton supporters to win in the fall. Obama didn't congratulate Clinton after her win in Nevada and how do you know she didn't when Obama cut into her speech.
Yes, she is down and she may not win
but you are troll.
On to your favorite topic of race and the Bradley effect which you love to mention.
Here is the last poll in 1982 for Tom Bradley vs. George Deukmejian.
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/666312002.html?dids=666312002:666312002
<b">&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&date=Nov+01%2C+1982&author=CLAUDIA+LUTHER%3B+NANCY+SKELTON&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&desc=Bradley+Inches+Ahead%3B&pqatl=google">Bradley led 49% to 42%</a>
Bradley went on to lose 51% to 49%. He polled the exact number that he got in the polls. Deukmejian got "all the undecideds."
Doug Wilder, another "victim" of the Bradley effect.
The Mason Dixon Poll had him winning 48% to 44%.
link
He polled exactly what he got.