Stoneburner
Diamond Member
- May 29, 2003
- 3,491
- 0
- 76
I don't understand, Biden is freakin awesome, how could anybody call him a douchebag? If anything he's an awesome douchebag.
Originally posted by: 351Cleveland
I make no comment on the current administration or any previous... but for all the stink made about Palin asking Charlie Gibson (quite defiantly... almost mockingly) the definition of the "Bush Doctrine" (a made-up media term), this guy cant go 2 sentences without glaring gaffes or contradicting his running mate.
-Forced down in Afghanistan and can tell you where Al Qaeda is... he was forced down due to a snow storm per John Kerry
-Obama supports the use of clean coal... Biden denounced clean coal the other day
-Tells a man in a wheel chair to stand up (more humorous than anything... that's just bad prep work on part of his staff).
-Obama criticized McCain's take on the bailout... when his running mate AGREED with McCain... had to denounce him.
-Biden critical of McCain-email add... until his handlers got to him.
-Television in 1929? FDR was president in 1929?
-Gotta have an Indian accent to go into a 7-11
-Hillary would be a better VP candidate?
-Has he plagaraized anything lately?
I mean I could go on, but you wouldnt enjoy it
and I have to do work... damn capitalist pigs are expecting me to EARN my ridiculous corporate salary I dont post this to change your mind...
most P&N junkies are cemented in their positions. I just point it out for our mutual entertainment
Now...if Palin would have said that instead of Biden...80% of the Left here at P&N would have gone bonkers. Am I wrong?Originally posted by: 351Cleveland
Interesting, the human gaffe machine is at it again:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/...n_history.html?showall
"When the stock market crashed, Franklin Roosevelt got on the television and didn't just talk about the princes of greed," Biden told Couric. "He said, 'Look, here's what happened.'"
Umm... who had a TV in 1929? Nevermind that Hoover was the President when the stock market crashed...
Originally posted by: Genx87
I love Biden, said this weeks ago. The man is great for providing material like this.
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Now...if Palin would have said that instead of Biden...80% of the Left here at P&N would have gone bonkers. Am I wrong?Originally posted by: 351Cleveland
Interesting, the human gaffe machine is at it again:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/...n_history.html?showall
"When the stock market crashed, Franklin Roosevelt got on the television and didn't just talk about the princes of greed," Biden told Couric. "He said, 'Look, here's what happened.'"
Umm... who had a TV in 1929? Nevermind that Hoover was the President when the stock market crashed...
Originally posted by: Genx87
I love Biden, said this weeks ago. The man is great for providing material like this.
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
It's just more proof that Biden is completely against the ideals of Obama's campaign.
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: 351Cleveland
but for all the stink made about Palin asking Charlie Gibson (quite defiantly... almost mockingly) the definition of the "Bush Doctrine" (a made-up media term)
This is so fail it's hard to comprehend.
1) she wasn't being defiant or mocking [and if that's what you saw, you really need to rewatch it sober], she was confused as shit. "You mean his world-view charlie? (please say yes please say yes! what's the Bush Doctrine???)"
2) a made up media term that has been widely used in national and international politics by politicians, the media, and anyone else as a shorthand for bush's foreign policy for, oh, the last 7 years? that doctrine that the experienced commander of the alaska nat'l guard had never heard of? the one referred to in 2002 by Ireland, UK, Germany, Canada, Japan, and France? that bush doctrine?
Originally posted by: Craig234
We agree there's too much cement - but there are good and bad reasons for holding a strong opinion. Because it's well-informed is one thing, blind partisanship is another.
Originally posted by: manowar821
Eh, maybe Biden can go F himself and leave the VP slot for someone worthy of it, hes a douche-bag.
Originally posted by: winnar111
Hmm, Biden must be thinking that he's gonna be running the show.
Originally posted by: 351Cleveland
Originally posted by: Craig234
We agree there's too much cement - but there are good and bad reasons for holding a strong opinion. Because it's well-informed is one thing, blind partisanship is another.
You will ahve to excuse me if I dont respond point by point. I wasnt getting into a debate on his qualifications... merely his lack of verbal discipline as it pertains to my entertainment.
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Now...if Palin would have said that instead of Biden...80% of the Left here at P&N would have gone bonkers. Am I wrong?Originally posted by: 351Cleveland
Interesting, the human gaffe machine is at it again:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/...n_history.html?showall
"When the stock market crashed, Franklin Roosevelt got on the television and didn't just talk about the princes of greed," Biden told Couric. "He said, 'Look, here's what happened.'"
Umm... who had a TV in 1929? Nevermind that Hoover was the President when the stock market crashed...
As would have been totally reasonable and rational.
If someone has a lot of expertise or experience in an area and they make a mistake, the mistake is usually ignored because of the large amount of information that shows they do in fact know what they are talking about. If someone has very little expertise or experience in an area they do not get the same pass as the other person because of this lack of counterbalancing information.
This is why McCain can mix up Sunni/Shia all day and pay a relatively small price for it due to his perceived foreign policy strength and if Obama were to make the same mistake he would be hit hard for it. What's the mystery?
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: manowar821
Eh, maybe Biden can go F himself and leave the VP slot for someone worthy of it, hes a douche-bag.
Your post contributes no content. I can't tell if you have reasons for your name calling or if it's just something you picked up by being identified with one yourself. You should put some thought into your post so readers don't get the wrong idea.
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: 351Cleveland
Interesting, the human gaffe machine is at it again:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/...n_history.html?showall
"When the stock market crashed, Franklin Roosevelt got on the television and didn't just talk about the princes of greed," Biden told Couric. "He said, 'Look, here's what happened.'"
Umm... who had a TV in 1929? Nevermind that Hoover was the President when the stock market crashed...
Yes, he meant radio - and pretty clearly meant in the period FDR was president while the stock market was still crashed.
Now how about his larger point on the leadership FDR provided in contrast to the current leadership, or is his mistaking tv and radio the only thing you have interest in?
And here I always thought Watergate was the name of a hotel/office complex in Washington, D.C.Originally posted by: Craig234
As for it being a 'made up media term', so is 'Watergate'...
Good old lupi; always trying to elevate the discussion.Originally posted by: lupi
At least he wasn't drunk this time.
Maybe he should have been.
Originally posted by: 351Cleveland
Interesting, the human gaffe machine is at it again:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/...n_history.html?showall
"When the stock market crashed, Franklin Roosevelt got on the television and didn't just talk about the princes of greed," Biden told Couric. "He said, 'Look, here's what happened.'"
Umm... who had a TV in 1929? Nevermind that Hoover was the President when the stock market crashed...