• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Obama slams insurers, demands health care reform

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Here is just one example of how our government manages Health Care

To explain, you get them through medicare and sell what you don't need or use. If you tell your doctor that you are on an intensive blood glucose monitoring regimen, he will prescribe up to 8 times more than you might actually use.

ALL of medical supplies for diabetics are like this on Ebay. Lancets, syringes, meters.

You can even get a $5,000 pump through medicare and decide that you don't like it. Take a wild guess where you can sell it.

Health care reform is a vehicle to increase the wealth redistribution already happening now. NOTHING MORE.


All taxes are wealth distribution by nature. Therefore, the military, postal system, infrastructure, medical research, FDA, police, fire, and everything related to government is "wealth distribution." Your "argument" is a joke.
 
All taxes are wealth distribution by nature. Therefore, the military, postal system, infrastructure, medical research, FDA, police, fire, and everything related to government is "wealth distribution." Your "argument" is a joke.

I think youre taking that phrase out of context. When we talk about wealth redistribution, we're talking about redistributing directly to taxpayers, not for services. I think you probably knew this.
 
I think youre taking that phrase out of context. When we talk about wealth redistribution, we're talking about redistributing directly to taxpayers, not for services. I think you probably knew this.

the term is definitely 'wealth re-distribution', and it is the transfer from taxpayers to folk who don't pay taxes, in general...

and your antagonist describes services that are of benefit to all, for the most part, and not the transfer of wealth specifically to some disadvantaged class from an advantaged class...
 
Back
Top