Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
Originally posted by: senseamp
If Bush did his job and regulated the banks properly, we wouldn't be in this mess.
exactly.
in addition, had Bush saved up enough during our nations' good time, we would have had enough reserves to fund our stimulus plan in bad times such as now.
Damn straight...and if Clinton also saved up enough during our nations' good times, we'd have even more reserves to fund our stimulus plan in bad times such as now. It's all so simple isn't it? :roll:
To blame all this all on Bush is pure BDS. You'll find that there's plenty of blame to go around assuming you've made an any attempt to understand what happened. Here's a news flash...
both parties failed us.
For the record, I'm glad to see Obama talk about the deficit being a problem and making an effort to deal with it. A definite improvement over the previous administration IMO.
It's the fault of Bush. Deal with it.
Bush X (VooDoo Economics + Laissez-Faire) = Major
Fail
Lol...and thanks for taking to time to share your 'objective' and 'highly intelligent' evaluation of this issue. But you might want to work a little bit on the 'objective' part...unless, of course, you've already sold your mind and soul to something that means absolutely nothing.
Feel free to explain securitization and leverage in your defense of lassez-faire. Do you even know what lassez-faire means?
Maybe then you can explain to all of us at AT the explosion of default swaps from less than $10 trillion to $65 trillion in 5 or six years.
In your explanation of securitization please be sure to explain how financial institutions used this tool. And then possibly you may explain the actions taken by the FDIC, the Treasury, the Fed, the SEC, or anyone for that matter, to identify abuse and take prudent action.
We'll be waiting for your answer.
Thanks for your contribution