Obama picks Rick Warren to deliver invocation

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

alien42

Lifer
Nov 28, 2004
12,882
3,309
136
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Genx87
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITI...bama.warren/index.html

Quite frankly I have enjoyed watching Obama play the centrist so far. This move is simply brilliant and gives the finger to the far left in his own party. This will be an interesting 4 years if this continues.

So far? Obama has always campaigned as a centrist. Even in the primaries, where you play to the base of your party Obama was pretty middle of the road. I know that during the general election the right tried to paint him as some far left commie angry black man that was going to enslave all the white people, but the truth is he's always been center left.

While I wish he were farther left than he is, I can't say I'm the slightest bit surprised at how he's run his transition.

Obama ran the Harvard Law Review from the center, that's just his style.
 

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: piasabird
This is just a prayer before he gets sworn in. If you fear a prayer then maybe you are a Theo-phobe.


Theopobe = AT = Dem's

Head + up ass = Budmantom...

/see how much fun that is....
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,684
35,518
136
So far his cabinet has been discouraging to say the least. A pro war opportunist for Secretary of State, a ethanol queen for Agriculture, and a welfare rancher for Interior. So much for change. Now picking religious right bigot to deliver the invocation.

Kucinich 2012!
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: ironwing
So far his cabinet has been discouraging to say the least. A pro war opportunist for Secretary of State, a ethanol queen for Agriculture, and a welfare rancher for Interior. So much for change. Now picking religious right bigot to deliver the invocation.

Kucinich 2012!

That's why I call him Black Bush. I mean the guy is so establishment it's not even funny and a neo-con to boot. Just wait till he gets those every morning NSA briefings from Neo-Con Gates and Smith he appointed. One good thing is he will stop the incessant whining of the press and left about being a war criminal president since they'll support him.

I'm with you. Both the real left and real right have good merits. This new party from Bush 1.0 on, what I like to call - Socialists for the bottom and top minorities of race and riches - is all about enriching a few at the expense of many and totally bought and sold by the MIC.
 

evident

Lifer
Apr 5, 2005
12,154
774
126
brilliant obama move. he shoulda chose fr phleger though, but then the conservative right would lash out at him for choosing a catholic
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,261
55,831
136
Originally posted by: Infohawk
But I thought he was the most liberal senator in the Senate?

If you read the study and how they came to that determination, you will see how absurd the distinction is.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,261
55,831
136
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: ironwing
So far his cabinet has been discouraging to say the least. A pro war opportunist for Secretary of State, a ethanol queen for Agriculture, and a welfare rancher for Interior. So much for change. Now picking religious right bigot to deliver the invocation.

Kucinich 2012!

That's why I call him Black Bush. I mean the guy is so establishment it's not even funny and a neo-con to boot. Just wait till he gets those every morning NSA briefings from Neo-Con Gates and Smith he appointed. One good thing is he will stop the incessant whining of the press and left about being a war criminal president since they'll support him.

I'm with you. Both the real left and real right have good merits. This new party from Bush 1.0 on, what I like to call - Socialists for the bottom and top minorities of race and riches - is all about enriching a few at the expense of many and totally bought and sold by the MIC.

How in the hell is Robert gates a neocon? Is that just some code for 'Republican I don't like'? He's an advocate of diplomacy over force, the exact opposite of neoconservatism.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,261
55,831
136
Originally posted by: dphantom
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Genx87
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITI...bama.warren/index.html

Quite frankly I have enjoyed watching Obama play the centrist so far. This move is simply brilliant and gives the finger to the far left in his own party. This will be an interesting 4 years if this continues.

So far? Obama has always campaigned as a centrist. Even in the primaries, where you play to the base of your party Obama was pretty middle of the road. I know that during the general election the right tried to paint him as some far left commie angry black man that was going to enslave all the white people, but the truth is he's always been center left.

While I wish he were farther left than he is, I can't say I'm the slightest bit surprised at how he's run his transition.

I think not. Obama was left of Clinton who is center left at best. His move towards the center is expected as would have been a conservatives' if one had won the election.

Nope, if you look at their policy platforms during the primary they were nearly identical. The principal difference was their views on health care, in which Clinton's was more leftist than Obama. Neither candidate was particularly leftist.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: ironwing
So far his cabinet has been discouraging to say the least. A pro war opportunist for Secretary of State, a ethanol queen for Agriculture, and a welfare rancher for Interior. So much for change. Now picking religious right bigot to deliver the invocation.

Kucinich 2012!

That's why I call him Black Bush. I mean the guy is so establishment it's not even funny and a neo-con to boot. Just wait till he gets those every morning NSA briefings from Neo-Con Gates and Smith he appointed. One good thing is he will stop the incessant whining of the press and left about being a war criminal president since they'll support him.

I'm with you. Both the real left and real right have good merits. This new party from Bush 1.0 on, what I like to call - Socialists for the bottom and top minorities of race and riches - is all about enriching a few at the expense of many and totally bought and sold by the MIC.

How in the hell is Robert gates a neocon? Is that just some code for 'Republican I don't like'? He's an advocate of diplomacy over force, the exact opposite of neoconservatism.

Yeah sure I guess forcing ourselves on Iraqis' for DECADES whether they like it or not is a real diplomat. Going into Pakistan whether they like it or not, ditto. Don't believe the hype read what he says and who he worked for.

http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=13891



 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Saw a clip of the Ann Curry Dateline NBC interview that will be airing tonight.

CURRY: If science finds that this is biological, that people are born gay, would you change your position?

WARREN: No, and the reason why is because we all have biological predispositions. I'm naturally inclined to have sex with every beautiful woman I see. But that doesn't mean it's the right thing to do.


Nice comparison fucknut. Gay men want to have sex with every beautiful man they see, but they don't go around doing that either. It's the fact that they want a man and not a woman that you can't wrap your tiny little head around. Putz.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: evident
im still waiting for winnar111's attackdog response to this move lol
Don't hold your breath. Rick Warren's a fat bloviating piece of shit, but he and Winnah11221!!! probably share the same social conservative "values" so there you have it: The one Obama pick that our resident nitwit won't nitpick.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,261
55,831
136
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: evident
im still waiting for winnar111's attackdog response to this move lol
Don't hold your breath. Rick Warren's a fat bloviating piece of shit, but he and Winnah11221!!! probably share the same social conservative "values" so there you have it: The one Obama pick that our resident nitwit won't nitpick.

Really? I thought this would be perfect Winnar bait. He could run in and scream "LOL CHANGE".

Of course, in typical Winnar fashion he wouldn't seem to realize that someone picking a person do deliver the invocation that he had significant disagreements with would in fact represent a break from tradition and constitute change, but this is Winnar we're talking about here.

I don't really appreciate Obama picking anti-gay people for prominent places in his inauguration, but as I originally said I'm not super surprised either.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,261
55,831
136
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: eskimospy

How in the hell is Robert gates a neocon? Is that just some code for 'Republican I don't like'? He's an advocate of diplomacy over force, the exact opposite of neoconservatism.

Yeah sure I guess forcing ourselves on Iraqis' for DECADES whether they like it or not is a real diplomat. Going into Pakistan whether they like it or not, ditto. Don't believe the hype read what he says and who he worked for.

http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=13891

Gates can still advocate the use of force in some situations and not be a neocon. I have seen no evidence that he advocates now, or has ever advocated the use of US military as a transformational instrument of democracy. If you have some links to this, please share them.

You can be a supporter of staying in Iraq and be nowhere close to a neoconservative. I wish we would get the hell out of Iraq too, but it's important to use terms correctly.
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81
Originally posted by: cubby1223
Originally posted by: jonks
You repeated that "he's a very liberal senator" but haven't said what positions make that so, just a voting record.

For the record, I'm not disputing that he's more liberal than centrist, but I saw him moving center during the primaries, not after the election.

Seriously :roll:

For example his voting record in regards to war, taxes & abortions. Very liberal.

You guys keep taking this as some sort of insult against Obama, when it really is not. It is merely a reflection of our distrust of all elected officials.

In 2004 Blagojevich ran on a platform of reform, and to clean up corrupt government...

In 2000 George W. Bush ran on a platform of honesty, integrity, and trust...

Very liberal in regards to veterans issues: http://www.veteranreportcard.org/reportcard.pdf
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
It's a brilliant and shrewd move by Obama. He might as well placate some conservatives with this move, but it has no actual legal or practical effect on the country. Shrewd.

Shrewd? Maybe. It isn't Obama's carriage, and it isn't Obama's horses. He decided to drive over the bump, rather than around. Or maybe it was the other way around? :confused:
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
My take on the Obama move of having Warren deliver the invocation may be the following contrast. The GOP strategy of the past 14 years was basically pushed by Gingrich and Rove, slice and dice various voting blocks and try to get and keep a 50.1 % majority. Then grant those in the majority their place at the table while telling those on the losing side to sit at the group W bench and shut up. And if those on the group W bench complain, they simply get ignored. Not only does such a GOP strategy result in a polarized country, it also results in social stagnation because basic social issues are not really addressed.

The Obama strategy seemingly now signaled is quite different. Despite the fact that the democrats have won a huge victory in the elections of 2006 and 2008 and now have the numbers to effectively ignore opposition viewpoints, Obama may be saying that the group W exile bench no longer exits, everyone has a seat at the table, Rick Warren gets a chance to speak out, but then may have to sit down, look to his right and left, and have to look eye ball to eyeball, at gays and Lesbians who also have a place at that same table.

Such a strategy can be very effective at reducing polarization and can result in social issues being addressed more responsibly. And now the onus is on Rick Warren and the religious right to more responsibly come to grips with groups they previously tried to demonize and ignore.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,936
10,827
147
Originally posted by: cubby1223
Originally posted by: jonks
You repeated that "he's a very liberal senator" but haven't said what positions make that so, just a voting record.

For the record, I'm not disputing that he's more liberal than centrist, but I saw him moving center during the primaries, not after the election.

Seriously :roll:

[1.] For example his voting record in regards to war, taxes & abortions. Very liberal.

[...]

[2.] In 2000 George W. Bush ran on a platform of honesty, integrity, and trust...

1. There is NO "liberal" stance on war, chubby, only intelligent ones based on the wisdom and necessity of said war . . . unless you consider FDR a pacifist.

2. All this proves is that Bush is a scumbag liar, and Obama is not.

. . . But thanks for pointing that out. Seriously! :laugh: