• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Obama on Iran and inequality.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
1. He's telling Iran that the might bomb the hell out of them.

2. He apparently plans to override Congress in his attempt to reduce inequality since he says the President can do it.

Of course, he'll fail to reduce inequality because the State can't bring equality without hurting everyone (see Venezuela, the Soviet Union). Raising the top marginal rate has yielded the govt $60Bn in additional funds... a drop in the bucket compared to how much would have to spent to reduce income inequality.

He's quite dangerous IMO.

[Link]
 
He has, however, increased inequality a little bit, especially for people who have been murdered by his drone strikes.

He bailed out the banks instead of doing nothing or bailing out people who lost their homes because they owed money.
His labor policies may increase wages but they won't help employment.
His stubborn refusal to end subsidies to the military industrial complex and big pharma.
His support for stronger Intellectual monopoly.
His support for the war on drugs.
raising the payroll tax.

Is he fucking joking or what?
 
1. He's telling Iran that the might bomb the hell out of them.

2. He apparently plans to override Congress in his attempt to reduce inequality since he says the President can do it.

Of course, he'll fail to reduce inequality because the State can't bring equality without hurting everyone (see Venezuela, the Soviet Union). Raising the top marginal rate has yielded the govt $60Bn in additional funds... a drop in the bucket compared to how much would have to spent to reduce income inequality.

He's quite dangerous IMO.

[Link]


A better example that highlights the contrasts of this statement is China and India. Especially when contrasting how China has pushed past India who still clings to that notion of equality and protectionism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top