• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Obama Fires Inspector General over waste probe into Obama supporter

Patranus

Diamond Member
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200...vice_inspector_general

WASHINGTON ? An inspector general fired by President Barack Obama said Friday he acted "with the highest integrity" in investigating AmeriCorps and other government-funded national service programs. Gerald Walpin said in an interview with The Associated Press that he reported facts and conclusions "in an honest and full way" while serving as inspector general at the Corporation for National and Community Service.

"It is vital that I have the fullest confidence in the appointees serving as inspectors general," Obama said "That is no longer the case with regard to this inspector general."

Huh...I seem to remember a big uproar about the (unproven) "politically motivated firings" of some US attorneys. It is nice to see President Obama's public comments affirming that this firing was politically motivated. Can we start the Code Pink marches now?
 
Oh man, winnar, you just can't stop yourself can you?

Try posting the whole story, retard:

WASHINGTON ?
An inspector general fired by President Barack Obama said Friday he acted "with the highest integrity" in investigating AmeriCorps and other government-funded national service programs. Gerald Walpin said in an interview with The Associated Press that he reported facts and conclusions "in an honest and full way" while serving as inspector general at the Corporation for National and Community Service.

In a letter to Congress on Thursday, Obama said he had lost confidence in Walpin and was removing him from the position.

Walpin defended his work on Friday. "I know that I and my office acted with the highest integrity as an independent inspector general should act," he said.

Obama's move follows an investigation by Walpin finding misuse of federal grants by a nonprofit education group led by Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson, who is an Obama supporter and former NBA basketball star. Johnson and a nonprofit education academy he founded ultimately agree to repay half of $847,000 in grants it had received from AmeriCorps.

Walpin was criticized by the acting U.S. attorney in Sacramento for the way he handled the investigation of Johnson and St. HOPE Academy.

"It is vital that I have the fullest confidence in the appointees serving as inspectors general," Obama said in the letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Vice President Joe Biden, who also serves as president of the Senate. "That is no longer the case with regard to this inspector general."


The president didn't offer any more explanation, but White House Counsel Gregory Craig, in a letter late Thursday to Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, cited the U.S. attorney's criticism of Walpin to an integrity committee for inspectors general.

"We are aware of the circumstances leading to that referral and of Mr. Walpin's conduct throughout his tenure and can assure you that the president's decision was carefully considered," Craig wrote.

Walpin said he gave the integrity committee "a full and complete response" that was also signed by several people who worked on the case. "I have no question but that we acted totally properly," he said in the interview.

Grassley had written Obama a letter pointing to a law requiring that Congress be given the reasons an inspector general is fired. He cited a Senate report saying the requirement is designed to ensure that inspectors general are not removed for political reasons.

Grassley said Walpin had identified millions of dollars in AmeriCorps funds that were wasted or misspent and "it appears he has been doing a good job."

The inspector general found that Johnson, a former all-star point guard for the Phoenix Suns, had used AmeriCorps grants to pay volunteers to engage in school-board political activities, run personal errands for Johnson and even wash his car.

In August 2008, Walpin referred the matter to the local U.S. attorney's office, which said the watchdog's conclusions seemed overstated and did not accurately reflect all the information gathered in the investigation.

"We also highlighted numerous questions and further investigation they needed to conduct, including the fact that they had not done an audit to establish how much AmeriCorps money was actually misspent," Acting U.S. Attorney Lawrence Brown said in an April 29 letter to the federal counsel of inspectors general.

Walpin's office made repeated public comments just before the Sacramento mayoral election, prompting the U.S. attorney's office to inform the media that it did not intend to file any criminal charges.

In settling the case, the government agreed to lift its suspension of any future grants to the academy and Johnson agreed to immediately repay $73,000 in past grants. The academy was given 10 years to repay the remaining $350,000.

Brown said at the time of the settlement that prosecutors determined there was no fraud, but rather a culture of "sloppiness" in St. HOPE's record-keeping.

Kevin Hiestand, chairman of the board of St. HOPE Academy, said in a statement it was "about time" Walpin was removed. "Mr. Walpin's allegations were meritless and clearly motivated by matters beyond an honest assessment of our program," he said.


Ken Bach, who works in the inspector general's office at the national service corporation, will be acting inspector general until Obama appoints someone to the position.

Walpin, a New York attorney, was appointed by then-President George W. Bush and sworn into office in January 2007 after being confirmed by the Senate, according to a news release on AmeriCorps' Web site. Walpin graduated from College of the City of New York in 1952 and received a law degree in 1955 from Yale Law School. He was a partner with the New York City law firm Katten Muchin and Rosenman LLP for more than 40 years.

Alan Solomont, a Democrat and the board chairman of the government-run corporation, and Stephen Goldsmith, a Republican and the board's vice chair, said they strongly endorsed Obama's decision.




Cliffs: There was evidence the guy did a bad job and filed a biased report. And he was canned.
end story.

sandorski predicted self pwnage.
And yes, self pwnage it is.
 
US attorneys are political appointees of the president who serve at his pleasure concentrating their efforts on those things he has set as his priorities among other duties. IG's have no responsibility to work on any priorities of the President and are responsible for reporting their findings dually to the administration and the congress. The President can fire a US attorney any time he wants to for any reason or no reason at all. To fire an IG he must have a reason and he must inform the congress of his reason and his intent BEFORE he fires him.
 
Originally posted by: aeternitas
Patranus, youre pretty much a clown.

Tell me, how is this ANY DIFFERENT from what the Democrats claim was done by Bush regarding the US Attorneys?
 
Hey Winnar. Can i come sit on your front porch and look out across the swamp sipping sweet tea and talking politics?
 
Cliffs: There was evidence the guy did a bad job and filed a biased report. And he was canned.
end story.

sandorski predicted self pwnage.
And yes, self pwnage it is.

Except Johnson and the Academy are refunding nearly 425K. So if this guy was completely full of shit why are both refunding that much?

I cant say for certain this guy got steamrolled. But I find it very interesting your own story confirms the people this guy were investigating agreed to return nearly a half million dollars in funds.

 
Originally posted by: sandorski
Not quite as Cut and Dry as you makke it sounnd. I'm gonna predict-Self Pwnage

have any of the mods checked to see if this guy is Winnar reincarnated???

Whata clown!!
 
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: sandorski
Not quite as Cut and Dry as you makke it sounnd. I'm gonna predict-Self Pwnage

have any of the mods checked to see if this guy is Winnar reincarnated???

Whata clown!!

See here you go again with the personal attacks.

A firing that is CLEARLY motivated yet I am acting like an idiot but Bush fires US attorneys and it is the end of the world.
 
Originally posted by: Patranus
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: sandorski
Not quite as Cut and Dry as you makke it sounnd. I'm gonna predict-Self Pwnage

have any of the mods checked to see if this guy is Winnar reincarnated???

Whata clown!!

See here you go again with the personal attacks.

A firing that is CLEARLY motivated yet I am acting like an idiot but Bush fires US attorneys and it is the end of the world.
He's not attacking you personally. He's attacking your idiotic posts and reasoning.


 
Originally posted by: JSt0rm01
Hey Winnar. Can i come sit on your front porch and look out across the swamp sipping sweet tea and talking politics?

You can Talk about the days of Math Olympics
 
Originally posted by: Patranus
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: sandorski
Not quite as Cut and Dry as you makke it sounnd. I'm gonna predict-Self Pwnage

have any of the mods checked to see if this guy is Winnar reincarnated???

Whata clown!!

See here you go again with the personal attacks.

A firing that is CLEARLY motivated yet I am acting like an idiot but Bush fires US attorneys and it is the end of the world.

So sorry, negatory.
 
Originally posted by: techs
"It is vital that I have the fullest confidence in the appointees serving as inspectors general," Obama said in the letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Vice President Joe Biden, who also serves as president of the Senate. "That is no longer the case with regard to this inspector general."[/b]
Isn't that almost the exact same thing Bush said after he fired those AGs?
 
Originally posted by: Patranus
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: sandorski
Not quite as Cut and Dry as you makke it sounnd. I'm gonna predict-Self Pwnage

have any of the mods checked to see if this guy is Winnar reincarnated???

Whata clown!!

See here you go again with the personal attacks.

A firing that is CLEARLY motivated yet I am acting like an idiot but Bush fires US attorneys and it is the end of the world.

You sound more and more like winnar everyday.....
This firing was not motivated in any other way than it was necessary.
Idiots like you don`t even read the articles that you use to distort the facts.

As Tech`s posted --
Cliffs: There was evidence the guy did a bad job and filed a biased report. And he was canned.
end story.

sandorski predicted self pwnage.
And yes, self pwnage it is.

 
An 'independent inspector general' is not a US Attorney (resiting the urge ... don't say it ... it's not nice to call some one a dumb ass ...).

Seems to me Walpin was bumping real close to a violation of the Hatch Act.

Walpin's office made repeated public comments just before the Sacramento mayoral election, prompting the U.S. attorney's office to inform the media that it did not intend to file any criminal charges .....

In August 2008, Walpin referred the matter to the local U.S. attorney's office, which said the watchdog's conclusions seemed overstated and did not accurately reflect all the information gathered in the investigation.


I suspect the truth (as always) lies in the middle (which, as typical, far away from this aNus allegation).
 
Except Johnson and the Academy are refunding nearly 425K. So if this guy was completely full of shit why are both refunding that much?


Anybody got an answer to that? Any of you limp wristed lefties who are attacking the OP?

Anyone?

 
Originally posted by: SecPro
Except Johnson and the Academy are refunding nearly 425K. So if this guy was completely full of shit why are both refunding that much?


Anybody got an answer to that? Any of you limp wristed lefties who are attacking the OP?

Anyone?

Who knows? He could have uncovered wrongdoing and still acted in an improper manner. The bipartisan panel that advises the president on this both strongly agreed with his decision.
 
This is typical of a Marxist Socialist Communist Fascist like Obama.

Change?!?
 
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: techs
"It is vital that I have the fullest confidence in the appointees serving as inspectors general," Obama said in the letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Vice President Joe Biden, who also serves as president of the Senate. "That is no longer the case with regard to this inspector general."[/b]
Isn't that almost the exact same thing Bush said after he fired those AGs?

Notice how neither techs nor any of the other obama-ites have commented on the comparison. Deflect, deflect, deflect.
 
There once was a wingnut who was bored as he sat on the hillside watching the sheeple. To amuse himself he took a great breath and sang out, "Obama! Obama! The Obama is chasing the sheeple!"

The villagers came running up the hill to help the wingnut drive the Obama away. But when they arrived at the top of the hill, they found no Obama. The wingnut laughed at the sight of their angry faces.

"Don't cry 'Obama', wingnut," said the villagers, "when there's no Obama!" They went grumbling back down the hill.

Later, the wingnut sang out again, "Obama! Obama! The wolf is chasing the sheeple!" To his naughty delight, he watched the villagers run up the hill to help him drive the Obama away.

When the villagers saw no Obama they sternly said, "Save your frightened song for when there is really something wrong! Don't cry 'Obama' when there is NO Obama!"

But the wingnut just grinned and watched them go grumbling down the hill once more.

Later, he saw a REAL Obama prowling about his flock. Alarmed, he leaped to his feet and sang out as loudly as he could, "Obama! Obama!"

But the villagers thought he was trying to fool them again, and so they didn't come.

At sunset, everyone wondered why the wingnut hadn't returned to the village with their sheeple. They went up the hill to find the wingnut. They found him weeping.

"There really was a Obama here! The sheeple has scattered! I cried out, "Obama!" Why didn't you come?"

An old man tried to comfort the wingnut as they walked back to the village.

"We'll help you look for the lost sheeple in the morning," he said, putting his arm around the wingnut, "Nobody believes a liar...even when he is telling the truth!"
 
Originally posted by: CPA
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: techs
"It is vital that I have the fullest confidence in the appointees serving as inspectors general," Obama said in the letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Vice President Joe Biden, who also serves as president of the Senate. "That is no longer the case with regard to this inspector general."[/b]
Isn't that almost the exact same thing Bush said after he fired those AGs?

Notice how neither techs nor any of the other obama-ites have commented on the comparison. Deflect, deflect, deflect.

Because the comparison is stupid. With Bush firing those US attorneys (not Attorney Generals), information came out that showed they were fired for insufficient partisanship, hackery, etc.

In this case you have a civil servant who has been smacked down by independent US attorneys previously for overstated claims, sloppy reporting, misleading documentation, lack of basic due diligence like the fact that they hadn't even bothered to determine how much money they wanted to claim was actually misspent.

You add on to this unproven allegations without any evidentiary corroboration, and then bafflingly and insanely ask why we aren't comparing a guy with documented work related issues that was dismissed with bipartisan approval with attorneys with exemplary work records dismissed for ADMITTED partisan reasons.

Did you even read the article?
 
Back
Top