• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Obama: Dallas shooter motive hard to "untangle"

Your right, any responsible POTUS should immediately go on national TV and try to incite more racial violence. I guess that would be the proper response.

🙄

Another LK fail.
 
Last edited:
I posted this yesterday in the Dallas thread. I posted his comments after the South Carolina shooting as contrast. I also invited anyone to identify a tangle because the motive appears to be consistent across all of the available media.

I'm willing to accept that the shooter was "demented" but why can't we accept this individual at their word, when we apply the same practice when the demographics are different?
 
I posted this yesterday in the Dallas thread. I posted his comments after the South Carolina shooting as contrast. I also invited anyone to identify a tangle because the motive appears to be consistent across all of the available media.

I'm willing to accept that the shooter was "demented" but why can't we accept this individual at their word, when we apply the same practice when the demographics are different?
Because black people can't be racist just like Islamic people can't be radical jihadis.
 
Because black people can't be racist just like Islamic people can't be radical jihadis.

There are certainly racist black people and radical muslims, but the point is there are more of what you might call the good ones. If this is still confusing, think of them as your counterparts in a different ethnicity, while most white people also shouldn't be discriminated against for the actions of some white people.
 
with Obama its always difficult. Radical Islamist kills gays in the name of ISIS -Obama has no idea why.

Black guy kills cops because he hates white people and cops. -Obama has no idea why.
 
and yet under the first black president it seems like things have gotten worse.

But yes lets blame lengedkiller.

He started the thread, I guess we should just think it came out of thin air I guess.

But then again, I should have considered the source of that comment also.

It must be really hard for that racist president to kill Daesh guys on a daily basis.
 
Last edited:
and yet under the first black president it seems like things have gotten worse.

But yes lets blame lengedkiller.

Please. There's a black Kenyan Muslim usurper in the Oval Office driving White America to ruin with his ebil soshulist agenda, don't you know? Look at the way Rich people have suffered for 8 years! It's like the invasion of Poland!

Wasn't even born in this Country! Hates all white people! Oh, the Humanity!
 
with Obama its always difficult. Radical Islamist kills gays in the name of ISIS -Obama has no idea why.

Black guy kills cops because he hates white people and cops. -Obama has no idea why.

White guy shoots up a black church - Obama can figure out that it was because he's a racist

:hmm:
 
White guy shoots up a black church - Obama can figure out that it was because he's a racist

:hmm:

It's part of a pattern that repeats itself throughout our history so it's pretty easy to figure out. We've had that flavor of hateful rhetoric & action for hundreds of years. Thanks to social media, we now have more instantly available flavors of virulent hatred than ever before steering marginal personalities off the edge of sanity. And plenty of guns to go around.

I mean, you're talking some really nutty hateful stuff, ya know? Just imagine how it affects people who don't have their shit as together as you do. This guy in Dallas just fell victim to a different flavor of the same thing.
 
I don't think we can come to that conclusion. It's all very tangled and we can't go off half cocked or we might give it power by naming it.

So name it. Obama said he was a demented individual. I say the the guy's mind was poisoned by hate.

I mean what? Do you think there aren't other armed & dangerous Gubmint & Murica hatin' fools of every color following a variety of demented ideologies out there?

In the face of that, do we spread FUD or denounce it?
 
Please. There's a black Kenyan Muslim usurper in the Oval Office driving White America to ruin with his ebil soshulist agenda, don't you know? Look at the way Rich people have suffered for 8 years! It's like the invasion of Poland!

Wasn't even born in this Country! Hates all white people! Oh, the Humanity!

obama's action have been questioned..... DEFLECT DEFLECT DEFLECT!!!!!!!!!!! Hurry play the islamaphobic race card!!!!!
 
obama's action have been questioned..... DEFLECT DEFLECT DEFLECT!!!!!!!!!!! Hurry play the islamaphobic race card!!!!!

It's unsurprising that you wouldn't notice that I wasn't talking about Obama at all, blinded by the very hate I mentioned.
 
So name it. Obama said he was a demented individual. I say the the guy's mind was poisoned by hate.

I mean what? Do you think there aren't other armed & dangerous Gubmint & Murica hatin' fools of every color following a variety of demented ideologies out there?

In the face of that, do we spread FUD or denounce it?

I just think it's weird that we can call a white guy who killed black people a white racist (and demand flags be banned for reasons), but the president dances around a black guy targeting white people (who inspired more black men to target more white people) as if there's an unclear motive when the police department in question spelled it out on live tv.

Of course there are more gubmint hating murricans, and certainly some of them are "right-wing sovereign citizen extremists" according to the DHS report last year which accused these extremists of carrying out "terror attacks" against the police. Now, perhaps I need to watch more brain rotting television but I don't think I've heard about these "terrorists" attempting to murder the police wholesale. Meanwhile, the New Black Panthers are on SPL's hate group list.

I guess I'm just wondering why it seems like our government has no problem naming "right wing terrorists" but runs in to "tangles" when a mass shooting that is arguably terrorism doesn't fit the bill. I'm just trying to figure out what possible reasonable purpose there could be for not simply saying the truth as it has already_been_published.
 
I posted this yesterday in the Dallas thread. I posted his comments after the South Carolina shooting as contrast. I also invited anyone to identify a tangle because the motive appears to be consistent across all of the available media.

I'm willing to accept that the shooter was "demented" but why can't we accept this individual at their word, when we apply the same practice when the demographics are different?

I agree. I think Obama is wrong on this one.
 
with Obama its always difficult. Radical Islamist kills gays in the name of ISIS -Obama has no idea why.

Black guy kills cops because he hates white people and cops. -Obama has no idea why.

I think there have been several facts that have come out of the Orlando shooters motivation to at least for me know that he wasn't the right wing narrative of "ISIS is in America!!!". Specifically his conflicting statements to 911 and the fact that he was possibly someone attending the club regularly. With lone wolf attacks like these the motivations have to be looked at much like they looked at the motivation of the Movie Theater shooter during the Batman Premier, they can be complicated and not at all what was first perceived.

I am rather surprised you want to jump the gun on this declaration when even the NRA seems to have caution when calling things outs (well we know why they have that caution 😛).
 
Back
Top