obama/Current Admin Not Attending Funeral For Margeret Thatcher

Page 10 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Listen I know you are obsessed with obama so go jerk off to him somewhere else. You and your ilk should go to Europe.

When Margaret Thatcher was fucking you with her strap-on dildo, did you scream "Oh, God" or "Oh, Margaret" or "Oh, Ron"? Also, did you go balls deep for her in real life are you are here? Did you bite the pillows for Margaret or was it only Ron Ron that made you feel that way?
 
Last edited:

blankslate

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2008
8,794
568
126
no one would care, you tool.

I agree I doubt many people who voted for Obama would actually be upset if no representative of the UK government in office at the time of President Obama's death had time to visit his funeral.

the only people making a stink about this atm are hard right loonies. The only people who would make a stink about who attends (or doesn't attend) the future funeral of the current president would be loons as well.
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
When Margaret Thatcher was fucking you with her strap-on dildo, did you scream "Oh, God" or "Oh, Margaret" or "Oh, Ron"? Also, did you go balls deep for her in real life are you are here? Did you bite the pillows for Margaret or was it only Ron Ron that made you feel that way?

When obama was fucking you with his strap-on dildo, did you scream "Oh, God" or "Oh, obama" or "Oh, bush"? Also, did you go balls deep for him in real life are you are here? Did you bite the pillows for obama or was it only bush that made you feel that way?
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,574
972
126
obama will not be attending the funeral of Margeret Thatcher and he won't be sending anyone from his administration to the funeral either. Instead Henry Kissinger, George Shultz and James A. Baker III will be attending the funeral who aren't part of this current administration.

Yes I know that obama has the Boston terrorist attack to deal with but this decision was likely made before that and he isn't even sending someone from his administration. This is just wrong and disrespectful to Margeret Thatcher. It is completely disgusting how he will let ideology get in the way of this.

He also did the same with Winston Churchill when he returned the bust back to England.

obama can't attend the funeral since he has to deal with Boston but he could at least send someone from his current administration to represent him.

Should obama send someone from his current administration to the funeral? Was obama wrong for not sending someone from his current administration to the funeral?


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-...d-thatcher-s-funeral-as-obama-stays-away.html

BTW-Your hero GWB didn't attend either.
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
Or his dad. Lol just some flunkies of Reagans.


Nancy's astrologist/tarot card reader will be probably more well loved for useful contribution to society no doubt.

Thatcher cut welfare and that must piss you off? Welfare shouldn't exist and she did the right thing in cutting welfare and destroying socialism.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Thatcher cut welfare and that must piss you off? Welfare shouldn't exist and she did the right thing in cutting welfare and destroying socialism.

Ok, I'll bite.

1) Why do you think welfare should not exist?

2) You do realize that there are many countries on earth where welfare does not exist, right? And they're all in the 3rd world.

3) Also, you do realize that lack of social welfare means that there will be extreme wealth demographics and that can lead to an unstable political-economic system, right?
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,574
972
126
gwb isn't my hero you moron. I have spoken against him numerous times before.

Sorry, I don't regularly follow your posts. I just know that I disagree with you on nearly everything and you seem to drink the christian conservative kool-aid pretty hard. I guess GWB just wasn't hard enough for you?

Thanks for calling me a moron though, it is good to know that two American citizens can converse without it degrading into name calling.
 

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,505
2
0
Incorruptible is a parrot.. a copycat. He can't come up with anything original or phrase a common thought/concept in an original way, so he imitates everyone.
 
Sep 7, 2009
12,960
3
0
I swear half of the posts in any thread he's in are nothing but idiotic broad personal attacks.

I guess none of you are capable of debating with him directly? It's certainly interested watching everyone flounder around over someone merely posting their personal opinions.
 

FerrelGeek

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2009
4,669
266
126
I really don't care that Obama didn't attend. However, he should have sent someone from the admin, like Biden or Kerry.
 

bshole

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2013
8,315
1,215
126
I am going to take a guess here, the people who are offended by Obama not attending are the same people who don't believe that he is a real american citizen, that believe he is muslim, that believe he conspired in Ben Ghazi, etc.... In other words, the same people who have been "morally outraged" about one silly thing after another throughout Obama's presidency.

When you use moral outrage too frequently, it kind of turns into the boy who cried wolf. It reflects more on you than the target of your righteous indignation.

Save the moral outrage for things that matter, not trivial crap like this.
 

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,505
2
0
I swear half of the posts in any thread he's in are nothing but idiotic broad personal attacks.

I guess none of you are capable of debating with him directly? It's certainly interested watching everyone flounder around over someone merely posting their personal opinions.

It would be great if we could determine that they are actually his/her/its opinions, but since they read like so many other people's opinions.. word for word.. there's no way to know.
 
Sep 7, 2009
12,960
3
0
It would be great if we could determine that they are actually his/her/its opinions, but since they read like so many other people's opinions.. word for word.. there's no way to know.


??? If anything, he posts his opinion and others agree.

Like I've said before, it's sad that some of you try to squash the voices of people who don't agree with you. At the very least, debate with him, but you in particular do nothing but derail any thread he posts in.

A friendly suggestion.... You "look" a lot better when you form a counter opinion compared to trying to silence him.
 

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,505
2
0
??? If anything, he posts his opinion and others agree.

No it's the other way around, I'm afraid. Every opinion post he's made reads.. word for word.. like something lifted from a Google search on the issue at hand.

Like I've said before, it's sad that some of you try to squash the voices of people who don't agree with you. At the very least, debate with him, but you in particular do nothing but derail any thread he posts in.

I am happy to derail any thread in which he copy/pastes the opinions and phrasing of others. Unfortunately, that's almost every post he/she/it makes.

And I don't particularly care if anyone has a problem with such derailing.
 
Sep 7, 2009
12,960
3
0
No it's the other way around, I'm afraid. Every opinion post he's made reads.. word for word.. like something lifted from a Google search on the issue at hand.



I am happy to derail any thread in which he copy/pastes the opinions and phrasing of others. Unfortunately, that's almost every post he/she/it makes.



Yet you ignore the 4-5 vocal extremists who do this very thing.............


But, they are "on your side", so I guess that makes sense.

Either way, I'm not going to get into it with you. Just giving my input on it and moving on, you've derailed the thread enough as it is.
 

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,505
2
0
Yet you ignore the 4-5 vocal extremists who do this very thing.............

But, they are "on your side", so I guess that makes sense.

I've chosen Incorruptible because he's particularly idiotic and obvious about being a copycat/parrot, not because of the actual opinions.

you've derailed the thread enough as it is.

That's too bad. Get over it.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
I swear half of the posts in any thread he's in are nothing but idiotic broad personal attacks.

I guess none of you are capable of debating with him directly? It's certainly interested watching everyone flounder around over someone merely posting their personal opinions.

It's pointless to confront him directly because there is no chance he will ever stop being an ass. The only outcome of a confrontation with him is I become more miserable for the experience. Nobody takes any post of his seriously, so it's best to ignore people like that. There is no up-side to such a debate.
 
Last edited:
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
??? If anything, he posts his opinion and others agree.

Like I've said before, it's sad that some of you try to squash the voices of people who don't agree with you. At the very least, debate with him, but you in particular do nothing but derail any thread he posts in.

A friendly suggestion.... You "look" a lot better when you form a counter opinion compared to trying to silence him.

Just check my other threads and this is all you will see. They disagree with me so they try to shut me down and they even admitted it.

They don't like their views challenged and get angry.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
??? If anything, he posts his opinion and others agree.

Like I've said before, it's sad that some of you try to squash the voices of people who don't agree with you. At the very least, debate with him, but you in particular do nothing but derail any thread he posts in.

A friendly suggestion.... You "look" a lot better when you form a counter opinion compared to trying to silence him.

I tried debating with him and he ran like roaches when the light comes on...